So let's say you create 10 GAs, then delete 3 and don't send the game/key to 2 winners. You then successfully deliver the remaining 5 keys. The counter will show 5, not 10. What it shows is the number of GAs you actually sent, not those you just created.
The fact that 'it's been like this until now' doesn't make it right. The website was just re-started anew with lots of big and little adjustments and improvements, I think it could be a good occasion to tinker with few trivial things too, that's it. Definitely not important though.
I wonder why you disagree with the second suggestion, re the 1-entry GAs count?
Comment has been collapsed.
Your user profile will show the right number of git sent, but your created page will show everything you created.
Comment has been collapsed.
Except that created giveaways that are not yet delivered do appear on the created page, and won games that you haven't yet received also appear on the won page.
Comment has been collapsed.
28 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by ColdOut
136 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by mourinhos86
1,352 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by stlpaul
15,420 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by BHTrellis188
19 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Chris76de
503 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Wok
11 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by magicmase
100 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by hbarkas
27 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by cassioht
10,390 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
657 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by alexfirehouse
65 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by CultofPersonalitea
82 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by Microfish
651 Comments - Last post 50 minutes ago by Zynthet
Naming.
The way I see it:
CREATED should be named GIVEN (or GIFTED) instead (created but not delivered are not counted)
WON should be RECEIVED (see above)
Also, for GAs with only ONE entry, atm:
if you are the creator, the game IS NOT counted
if you are the winner, the game IS counted
shouldn't this be consistent? either yes or not for both?
Comment has been collapsed.