No. Maybe if you used the magical search bar, you'd see this is the fourth time this minute someone opened this thread and that the opinion of the majority of users and the staff is that, until someone actually comes up with a system that isn't entirely stupid, 300P is good. The problems you raise are not as big an issue as people keep thinking they are. If you're not happy with the level of discussion in this thread, maybe you should have closed it before the flames got too hot for you. I'm closing it now.
Comment has been collapsed.
107 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by VicViperV
21 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by hbarkas
2,039 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Ledyba
10 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Georgeous
35 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by reigifts
1,120 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by root777
406 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by mramsterdam
870 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by squall831
996 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by DrTenma
32 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by Lugum
189 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by nonamebg
234 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Naviis
153 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by skincriedon
31,386 Comments - Last post 51 minutes ago by xeos23
There, I said it. I know a lot of you don't agree.
I think people have too many points, and are entering giveaways of games which they are not even interested in. Thus, this results in a lot of redundant entries everywhere, reducing the winning chance of those few who only enter games that they really want to play.
This is especially true ever since contributor value was introduced, increasing the number of giveaways on the site as well as point regeneration.
I don't know, I just think people want to win for the sake of winning now. Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins.
Honestly 180-200P is just about enough if you ask me.
Edit: Haha, so much for a civil discussion eh? Yall have a good day too.
Comment has been collapsed.