Allow multiply entrys per giveaway?
If I remember correctly this was brought up some time ago and it was stated that this would never happen. I can't remember the details of it but basically what Unrealrage said. You can look at a thread here for a bit more about it, but I'm sure there are others as well.
Comment has been collapsed.
There is one site that allows them and I don't think it improves anyones chances other than bots.
Comment has been collapsed.
It definitely does for low-entry giveaways. Of course this means it only works for cheap or unpopular games.
Comment has been collapsed.
I often don't spend my points either. It's hardly a "problem" though, nothing negative happens.
Comment has been collapsed.
+1. do you really need two sites with over 100,000 entries on a game. I don't.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's exactly what I wanted to say.
They have those raffles that require you to join groups you would never care about in exchange for having a chance to participate in a giveaway with 12300423 entries.
Comment has been collapsed.
Everyone should have equal chances of winning a giveaway.
I agree with him.
Maybe some giveaway trains have games you have in your wishlilst. There are many trains active right now :p!
Have really joined all public giveaways for a game in your wishlist? I assume you don't have many games in your wishlist then :o.
Also have this GIF of Wonder Woman being cool and stuff.
Comment has been collapsed.
Some tips which would help you to solve your problem:
- Add more games in your wishlist
- Take higher contribution level
Comment has been collapsed.
Points are free. If there's no game you want to use them on to enter, then just leave them there.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, this site does have a lot more listed than S.C. , so likely it would really up the entries on some games, while lowering entries on others (there's still a finite amount of points)
But like others have said, there's no penalty for sitting at 300p... I seem like I'm there every time I look.
There was no "meh" option, which would have been my vote!
Also it would make it harder to see if you had 5 entries (assuming you'd need unique entries) as creator to qualify for CV... Not MUCH harder, but it would generate arguments over whether it qualified or not, and support would endlessly be dealing with that added issue.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a very good point you are making there, my friend, but in my opinion there is one aspect missing in your arguement, which would be NOPE
Comment has been collapsed.
This will happen.
1) Create a Fortix giveaway, make it last for a week.
2) Let people put in 300 entries every few hours or so.
3) At the end of giveaway, Fortix have 12 billion entries.
4) Delete giveaway.
5) Quit SG.
6) Play Fortix.
Comment has been collapsed.
no
reason 1: no
reason 2: no
reason 3: see reason 1
reason 4: see reason 2
something like that :3
Comment has been collapsed.
I really dislike the idea. You think it's hard winning games now? Just think how much more difficult it would be if people had multiple entries!
Comment has been collapsed.
Didn't know about steamcompanion ty. Thx for ur opinions.
Comment has been collapsed.
No way, i hate to see SG turn into some kind of SC.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hi everybody. I suggest to allow multiply giveaway entrys for the same points. (for sure)
I have the problem that i have to much points. I'm already in all games of my wishlist and I don't want to spend my points on games I don't want. So I thought it might be a good idea to allow multiply entrys per giveaway.
What do u think?
/discuss
Comment has been collapsed.