I got into a rather heated discussion with somebody the other day about the right way of figuring out how much a bundle game is worth in trade. This got me thinking, what's the most widely used method? So I thought I'd just put the question to you guys: what's the best way of figuring this out? What method do you use?

I have seen people explicitly mention the following methods (all poll options). I'd be interested to hear others.

  1. Price on Steam - Official list price is used as a guide to game worth. (In most cases people only seem to use this for comparing bundled games. I'm not sure how one uses this to establish the monetary worth of a previously bundled game.)

  2. Price of bundle - pretty obvious, a game's value is proportionate the price one had to pay to get it in a bundle

  3. Price of bundle tier divided by number of games - I just saw this recently: figure out how much a specific tier of the bundle cost, divide it by the number of games in it, and that's the approximate value of the individual game key. (Again, not monetary value, just relative trade value.)

  4. Price on sale - Just like the first method, but using the low recorded prices rather than the current one.

  5. Apparent supply/demand - Primarily looks at how many keys for a certain game seem to be available versus how many people want it to determine value.

I'd expect that a lot of people use some combination of these methods, and a lot more use no explicit method at all. But that's part of what I'd like to find out.

8 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

What method do you use to estimate value?

View Results
Price on Steam
Price of bundle
Price of bundle tier divided by number of games
Price on sale
Apparent supply/demand
Other (including potatoe-related methods)

I don't trade, so I guess potatoe?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, I've been surprised to find how many very active users on this site don't trade. It's why I joined, even though I've done quite a few giveaways since then.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah, I kind of avoid trading. Seems like it is just another area I would stress over. :/

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+2. Yes.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Same.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't trade more than twice a year but still:
As i have found quite a few people who do not buy bundles or don't even know their existence, i rely on the price those games had on sale.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I feel like I used to run into more of those people a year and a half ago, when I joined, than I do now. There seem to be more people running big organized operations in the trade section now. (But it's possible that's just me remembering because I wasn't paying adequate attention at the time.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I go by bundle price + supply/demand

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Other factors are how many times it's been bundled and how recently it's been bundled. Sometimes that means more than the actual Steam price of the game.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

All of your factors have flaws. The final price depends on much more of them, for example how good the game is (yes, people still want to get GOOD games, not the trash).

Usually it's #3, combined with number of rebundled number (how many times game got bundled already), combined with how recently bundled, combined with reviews, combined with trading cards, and finally combined with how much the guy wants to get it, which is usually 0 factor for game collectors who do not play them, so that one can be skipped.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah. Then again, it seems like some collectors especially want games pulled from Steam (I'm not sure how much demand this actually represents, just an odd exception to the rule...)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh yeah, if the game is pulled off steam you can ignore all of that and just price it based only on how many keys/gifts are left and how popular game is. Prices are ridiculous.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Depending on the trader, each one of the 5 can come into play. Bundle buyers who split them usually use #3. That's the only time I've really encountered that.

Some go for T2/BTA = T2/BTA trades meaning equal tiers in a bundle but it's usually humble bundles that are involved.

Price on steam: I've encountered that a couple of times and it's beneficial if you have a high value bundled game versus <$5 games.

Certain games will always fall into Supply/Demand even if their value via bundles is less than 1 TF2/CSGO key. ex.(Total War, Terraria, etc) These most often get a 1 key tag onto them because non-bundle buyers don't really care about other market economics. Just that it's cheap at 1 key via their perceived value.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

For bundle-to-bundle trades:
1: Determine retail value. This is the game's trading value for sites such as Steamgifts (ie, CV) and so will always be relevant. It's also relevant to determine what the cost of buying the game for the person in question would be- they obviously missed it when it was on sale after all.
2: Next, determine if the game has been repeatedly bundled or in low-demand (lower the effective value), is taken off Steam or in low-trading-supply (increase the effective value), or was previously free (generally greatly reduces effective value).
3: Finally, determine the tier price for each game. If relatively similar, make no adjustment. Otherwise, calculate a deviation for tier 1 value if necessary, then subtract tier 1 value, divide the remainder, and determine effective cost paid. Adjust by relative value to other game if quality in tier is notably inconsistent.

Alternatively, just go with 'whatever you trade you feel comfortable with/don't trade if you don't feel totally okay with the offer'.

As you prefer :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've done that last one more often than I probably should. Occasionally the fact that I'm dealing with an investment of just a few cents makes me sloppy.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ah, for me, so long as both parties are satisfied and without qualms, it's a good interaction.
I don't worry too much about it being perfect, just about making sure as best as possible that noone has any regrets :)

Really depends how much you want to treat it like Wall Street Trading, versus treating it like behind-the-school trading card trades with friends. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That seems right. I just have some hangups about being taken advantage of left over from my days playing Magic the Gathering. (When I was first starting out in organized play I got taken pretty hard a couple times.)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

...humans can suck >_<

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is true. But ten years later I'm mostly over it. :)

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As far as I know supply/demand is mainly for removed titles and collectors. Since all other titles are on Steam and have a chance to be bundled or see deep discounts, it will be harder to explain/convince other party about supply/demand logic. But collectors know that logic very well and do not usually low ball on offers.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You seem to be right: people sometimes don't think in terms of supply and demand. (Though I'm surprised at how well that option is doing in the poll.)

There are exceptions even there, though--certain popular and older bundle games are considered more valuable because a lot of people want them and the number of bundled copies is diminishing. Or take something like Reassembly: it basically isn't treated as a bundle game because pretty much no one purchased the tier it was in (or if they did they kept the game). I've never seen a single Humble copy of it traded, and likewise I've never seen people offering it act like it's a bundle game at all.

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Value: Price of bundle tier divided by number of games heavily influenced by supply/demand

  • tier x has 3 games and costs 6$
  • let's start from every game is worth 2$
  • but let's assume that 2 games are very old and not a lot of people are interested.
  • the third game is a desiderable AAA game.
  • probably 2-2-2 won't work, maybe 3-1,5-1,5 is more viable
8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Supply/demand is indisputable in the end (if you don't match the market, you will never get a trade done unless you basically scam people).
What determines supply/demand are the other factors. So it shouldn't really be in a poll option of it's own :P
Price on Steam is pointless, because Steam has unlimited supply, and nobody would pay Steam price for a game since they save nothing.
It's a combination of 2. 3. and 4. based on demand (pulling upwards) and lowest recorded sale/bundle price (pulling downwards).

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I usually look at it from a couple of different views. First I usually check how interested I am in the game the other person is offering (I only trade my bundle leftovers for games I'm actually interested in). Then I'll look at the prices on different marketplaces (including steam and the "grey market" sites). But overall I usually decide on how much I paid for the game (so $1 tier / BTA) and wheter I really want to get rid of it or how interested I am.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for all of the feedback, folks. That is useful to me in answering the questions I began with.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.