When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
149 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by im0nit
13 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Carenard
300 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by aquatorrent
3,221 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by MeguminShiro
211 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by LinkW
17,282 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by paco7533
9 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by antoniogmad
11,540 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by quinnix
1,560 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by quinnix
30,742 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by mourinhos86
536 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by xeos23
102 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by ObsidianSpire
2,066 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by reigifts
16,427 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Xeton99
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.