When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
1,146 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by Gamy7
1 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by LinustheBold
24 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by tungmapu
15,616 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Chad78
21 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by icaio
661 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by SuperT
2,232 Comments - Last post 14 hours ago by MeguminShiro
19 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
30 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Masafor
196 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Masafor
32 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by GoldenDragon95
9,081 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by CurryKingWurst
77 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by ThatDave
36 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by ThatDave
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.