When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
4 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Carenard
26 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by KitianaFoxtail
24 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kirbman101
814 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
47,378 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by misterhaan
1 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by ILLUSIVESNAKE95
1 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
78 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by XiaoLong
3 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Scruffman
5 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by JTC3
102 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Tomoel69
159 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by WaxWorm
95 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Carenard
1,725 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by Griske14
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.