When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
220 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by GeorgeCZ
31 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by LORDMJ
14 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by katukinabarra
76 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by pizzahut
306 Comments - Last post 53 minutes ago by Ydrisselle
17 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Akrat
577 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by CapnJ
102 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by eeev
1,774 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by MouseWithBeer
917 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by wizcreations
441 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by na1
90 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Matwyn
6 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lugum
157 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CaspianRoach
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.