When Bethesda touted Starfield would have a thousand procedurally generated planets I immediately thought about No Man's Sky when it first released and KNEW they were gonna be boring, lifeless worlds. At least NMS tried to generate unique wildlife even though the animals looked janky as hell and very stupid at times. There's just no way a company as lazy, incompetent, and stuck in the past as Bethesda could have procedural generation that would be convincingly complex and varied.
Comment has been collapsed.
Correction. They are saying "Game is great. You are boring, it just works. Now pay up for work we did not do".
Comment has been collapsed.
1 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by LinustheBold
1,145 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by BanjoBearLV
24 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by tungmapu
15,616 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Chad78
21 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by icaio
661 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by SuperT
2,232 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by MeguminShiro
12 Comments - Last post 11 seconds ago by Janediel
1,229 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by blankusername
98 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by FullMetalZ
29 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by Tucs
69 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by twchiu
28 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by twchiu
2,512 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by matsalkoshek
https://www.vg247.com/starfield-bethesda-responding-to-negative-steam-reviews
Bethesda Customer Service responding to negative reviews: "Game is great, you're boring, it just works."
Comment has been collapsed.