Oh no, the 12yo autistic fanboys are at it again.

Also:

Intel Stock: 42,36 EUR
AMD Stock: 18,61 EUR

"Intel is dead"

AMD can do whatever they want but they are not seeing a cent of my money till they release some actually working drivers for my GPU. And that will probably never happen so shrug.

Yes, I am salty, but I have a very good reason to be...

Dead has... World of Warcraft dead ?

I don't trust it personally, 3850X specs are too good for this price and you know what they say if it's too good....

Intel is dead has been voiced since what, 2000 era? Like Windows is dead?

Guess those people who scream Intel (and Windows) is dead do not even understand what they are shouting at.

But I like emulation.

Intel will show you the power of 14nm +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
300W TDP

Intel is not dead, competition is alive, and that is all that matters. Now we just need Intel to release some good GPUs soon so Nvidia can stop with the outrageous pricing.

i got 99$ problems and a lack of threads aint one

ripintel

Great news. At long last some worthy competition. Intel will have to snap out of their rehashing cycle and bring out the heavy stuff. I love having as many options as possible when buying something and this is great news for consumers.

This is nothing but a rumour. AMD hasn't announced anything yet. We don't know if this even resembles the truth.

I've been using a Ryzen 5 1600 since july of last year, and been loving it so far.

I'm waiting for the 3600X Poggers

Never bet on a rumor.
Intel/AMD/Nvidia all toot their own horns pre-launch, even "leaking" themselves to build hype.

I have yet to see, in all my years building PCs, any single piece of hardware live up to the pre-launch hype.

Well Intel is not dead, it still has majority of server market in it's grasp etc. AMD wanted to steal like 20% of servers at best.

But extra cores for less money is always appreciated, and if AMD will be less pricey in the future I will buy 3600 or smth to change my 4590. I won't see difference between 120 and 110 FPS, but extra cores will allow me to play and stream (or record) game at the same time without stuttering, drop time needed to process movies etc. So be able to do something on top of playing game that utilize fully 4 cores.

You realise those rumours are likely bogus? They are simply unrealistic for a variety of reasons:

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/281810-the-latest-rumors-about-amds-ryzen-3000-series-are-too-good-to-be-true

As someone else said, I'll wait for benchmarks, it's never a good idea to buy too soon after the release anyway. And it's not as if my current CPU was an issue.
Still, 7 nm will be particularly interesting if it's confirmed, as I'm stuck on laptops so perf/watt is what matters the most for me.

3700X or 3800X seems like fine choice if these are true. to replace my almost almost 6 years old 6C / 12T processor.

in fact amd is outselling intel 2:1 at the moment and has been for a few months. obviously this was helped by intel's 14nm shortage but despite intel putting out some 'new' cpus people prefer amd's 'old' but reasonably priced stuff.
however sample size seems kind of limited since they only refer to mindfactory's sales data (german pc hardware online shop). still it provides a decent insight and it would be foolish to assume that all other shops experience a completely different situation.

No thanks my room is warm enough without AMD products.