Trojan at SG?

definitely updated, I though about false positive, it's too strange behaviour in my opinion

actually I think it started when I clicked some link from discussions to hrk or other stie like this with free giveaway or something, can't check as I cleared cache and history from today :/

But then you can't watch it in 4K.

The internet wasn't safe back in the day.
My nokia 6300 was killed by a malware.

this one is definitely too much malicious for me, hope your computer won't burn down ;)

+1

Malware is certainly usually the reason I reenable adblock after disabling it on a frequently accessed site (I mean, it says a lot if a site doesn't filter out malware, or utilizes an ad host who doesn't), though poor optimization of site scripts or inept layout-breaking placement of ads are also valid reasons. Basically, it's our obligation to try and support a site we're making committed usage of, but it's not our obligation to put up with unnecessary stress during those efforts (in short, if you want our support, don't give us a middle finger when we try to give it).

In fact, it's to the point where I've got multiple layers of anti-adblock blocked on certain sites, just 'cause it's easier to hunt down their scripts and counter them, than it is to deal with their user-unfriendly mess of a site. Which makes you think, what if they actually allocated their efforts constructively, toward making the site desirable to use without adblock, instead of arrogantly trying to railroad users into putting up with abuse?

I've seen a good handful of high profile sites take that route and the funny thing is, even when they manage to beat anti-anti-adblock efforts, the only end result is who users that actually care about things like adblock end up not utilizing the site at all (or at least, that's how it resolves for me, personally). There's just not many sites that are both "necessary" and don't also have alternative options available.

Abusive sites have always been targeted toward inexperienced, inherently vulnerable internet users, so it's weird how much effort is being put toward trying to grab protected users. Of course, as I noted, some portion of this comes from established, big-name sites (eg, digital newspapers), so pure, thoughtless arrogance (ie, "How DARE they adblock us! Stop them, stop them at all costs! AND SOMEONE GET ME PHOTOS OF SPIDER-MAN!") has certainly got to be the sole premise behind at least some of the efforts.

I use F-secure as antivir. I've made full scans with f-secure, malwarebytes, spybot searchdestroy, spyware terminator, supera antispyware, loaris trojan remover, superaAntispyware and they all found literally nothing so I still don't have a slightest idea what's going on and still gots promps from f-secure only on SG

That's obviously a fake.
Her pleasure? ahahhaha :D