You're fine with the 840 instead of the 840 Pro.
In fact, I would advise getting a 250GB 840 instead of a 128GB 840 Pro.
The extra space will keep it fast longer. Unlike HDDs, SSDs like to have spare area to spread out the workload across more NAND chips.
Comment has been collapsed.
so I presume you don't have a 2.5" slot? Those slots that were used for FDD (Floppy) drives back in the day? In that case you'd be better off with the kit. Usually you get tons of SATA cables with the mainboard so it's probably a prebuild PC?
Anyway, you can't go wrong with the kit, it comes with the needed cables and the bracket to fit the SSD into a standard HDD slot.
Comment has been collapsed.
3.5" slots were used for -wait for it- 3.5" floppy drives.
2.5" slots are typically only for storage drives.
Comment has been collapsed.
Even a cheap 2.5" SSD is orders of magnitude better than any HDD on the market.
Comment has been collapsed.
I disagree that it is important to have faster (level-)loading times for competitive gaming but it's good to see that you are not under the illusion that an SSD will give you a higher framerate :3
the improvement will be quite subjective when it comes to COD though. the fresh OS install without any fragmentation of the game-files will probably give you the biggest boost here.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, maybe. My main SSD is currently at about 40% capacity (66GB / 111GB free), holding only Windows and a few applications. Larger apps, games, userprofile and such are all stored on different drives.
It really depends on how many (large) games you want to install on there.
Comment has been collapsed.
The spare area keeps speeds up. I would spring for a 500GB SSD if you can afford it.
I bought a 500GB Samsung 840 for my laptop (bootcamped Win7 MBP13'09) and I've only filled up about 30-40% of it. I got my SSD for $280 on a decent sale. It's not hard to find respectable 500GB SSDs for around $300.
If $300 is a little rich for your blood, spend $150 on a 250GB SSD. It's wasteful to get a 120GB SSD. You're paying more than half the price of a 250GB for less than half of the capacity. They are slower right off the bat and only get slower still as you fill them up.
Comment has been collapsed.
let's have a look at the ESL... yup, COD is listed there so I'd classify it as a competitive game. Question is: when do you actually need to have things load faster? Having Windows load faster is rather nice but in games I have seen only very limited use.
So far the only games that actually demand an SSD in my opinion were open world games like GTA or Saints Row which constantly stream assets and textures from the drive. On slower drives and when traveling quite fast through the world you can experience low fps or even a disappearing world. Otherwise? Not all that much improvement.
Anyway, I wouldn't go with a large SSD but rather a secondary HDD, possibly more than one in a RAiD 0 configuration if you want to have faster access at the expense of fault tolerance.
Comment has been collapsed.
You're correct that maps load perceptively faster. Actual gameplay is nigh identical though.
You'll really notice it when you're just using your machine normally. After startup, the moment you see the Windows desktop, you can actually start up applications and they just pop on. Just like games, the experience is pretty typical once you get into the application, but short load times are much nicer than they sound.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hello Sir,
i owned a SSD for the past 2 years (~22 months) but 3 days ago it broke.
you know that a SSD can break pretty easy ? you should only use it for your o/s and maybe some programs you really want to boot fast.
but you never should put important data on the ssd, the manufacturer will exchange your broken ssd, but the files cant be recovered.
Comment has been collapsed.
And I also have to disagree here. It all depends on how you use your drives. If you turn your PC on and of quite a few times a day a normal HDD will never reach a long lifetime. the strain and mechanical wear from spinning up and stopping will make sure of that.
And on the SSDs side it depends on how much data you read and write. The lifetime of an SSD is not calculated in hours but in write-cycles. SLC drives have an estimated 100.000 write-cycles while MLC are somewhere around 3.000-5.000 cycles. If you are a very high end user (usually only applies to enterprise) than it is actually possible to burn through an SSD somewhat rapidly.
Comment has been collapsed.
I have to disagree. It doesn't matter if SSD or HDD, if the drive breaks your files are gone. Unless you want to pay a hefty sum to a recovery firm. If you want your files to be safe you have to have multiple copies on multiple, independent drives / disks whatever.
You can have (bad) luck with both SSD and HDD. A while back I ordered a few HDDs and none of them lived past a single year, even receiving one DOA (dead on arrival).
Comment has been collapsed.
You should always have a backup.
At almost any moment, you should be able to take a sledgehammer to your machine and feel completely satisfied that your data is safe.
SSDs do not have increased failure rates compared to HDDs. Shit happens. You got a bad SSD. Some people get equally bad HDDs.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's not super important to get one of those. A lot of new cases just bolt 2.5" SSDs to the side of the case. They don't vibrate and airflow isn't tremendously important if they are right next to a metallic case wall.
Comment has been collapsed.
What's with this 2.5" floppy business?
I heard that in another comment thread. Modern floppies are 3.5" wide. There's no way you're fitting the disk into a drive that's limited to 2.5" wide.
How do you guys have 2.5" floppy drives?
Comment has been collapsed.
Modern + Floppy doesn't sound right :D
Also, magic! :p It's quite old format, and wasn't succesfull, maybe that's why most people don't know those existed. There were too many FDD formats to remember. I think I remember there were even 2" FDDs :)
Comment has been collapsed.
17 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by SeaGoblin
40 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by rngn
345 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Vasharal
1,041 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
78 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cheshirecatgirl
10 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Axelflox
42 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by SeaGoblin
1,043 Comments - Last post 12 seconds ago by Bubles
525 Comments - Last post 46 seconds ago by DrTenma
412 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by steveywonder75
108 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by PapaSmok
109 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by schmoan
62 Comments - Last post 21 minutes ago by NucularS
493 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by GreyF0xx
Hey guys!
Im goint to buy a SSD for my PC,
but I dont know which kit I should buy.
There are 2 Kits: All on one and the Basic kit.
Do I need to buy the All in One kit to connect the ssd
to my mainboard or not? I ll set my whole PC new up, so that means,
i dont need any software, to move all my files to the new SSD
Link: SSD
Comment has been collapsed.