Running giveaways with higher levels encourages users to do giveaways to increase their level. Please prioritize who contributes to the growth of the site and community.

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Who asked? What are you on about?

  1. This is already a level-locked ga.
  2. Higher level ga's don't encourage users to increase their level because most people use the setting to auto-filter out ga's above their level. The more people subscribe to this mindset, the more empty the site looks for the average user.
  3. Dropping unsolicited peer pressure to tell users they're engaging in the community 'the wrong way' is scummy.
  4. You are level 3. If the requirement was any higher, you wouldn't have even seen this in the first place!
  5. If new users have to buy their way into the community, that is most definitely NOT prioritizing the growth of the site and community. That's promoting a closed loop of self-indulged elitists.
  6. GA's are great and all, but if you want to help grow the site and community, point people towards the forums. Start a conversation, invite discussion (you know...in the Discussions tab). Not everyone has the money to contribute ga's to the site, but everyone can contribute to the forums in some way.
1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ofc it's you again, who couldn't hold his shit together, repeating old lame weak wrong and refuted arguments

  1. You don't say Sherlock. He wasn't suggesting a basic level restriction to start with.
  2. This is an highly suggestive and hypothetical argument and not even coherent. Why shouldn't higher level restricted GAs encourage people to gift themselves? You're arguing, that they'll completely forget about all the GAs they have seen, when they change the basic setting, which shows all GAs, assuming they'll change it in the first place and even most people doing it. Assuming furthermore that they'll instantly forget about every level restricted GA they run into, watching at trains or other invite GAs.
    The behaviour i've seen from abusers is, that they jumpstart to a higher level instantly, there must be a reason, why they're encouraged to do that, but i recognize your efforts in stubbornly resisting any attempt to get educated on that topic and still taking the wrong conclusions, because of lacking knowledge, pushing your agenda in whiteknighting leechers, auto-joiners and abusers.
    And why should the site look more empty to the average user, when a GA is set e.g. from 3 to 4? Looking at the user stats https://www.steamgifts.com/stats/community/users the average user is level zero.
    You hadn't your brightest day, when you wrote all that BS.

A bigger problem for the average user are the overcrowded GAs, which is indeed a strong point for them to level up, to get better chances to win.
And that the site will look more empty is even a problem for higher levels, being at a 9-year low in created GAs last month and this month doesn't look good either, which is exactly what i predicted over a year ago btw, but i'm sure it'll help, if there are more GAs available for level zeros, who never give back; and we aren't talking about homless people here, we're talking about stingy gamers and it'll not be the first site, which they brought down.

(6.) Pretty BS, getting invested in the forums only generates traffic, which only helps to grow the purse of lazy ass cg, doing nothing about all the auto-joiners and multis, which are the real problem for your lovely level zeroes, lowering their chances to win.
In the end people come here for the GAs, not to socialize.

1 week ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

🤣🤣🤣
The mental gymnastics on display from you are WILD 😂

And if you're going to throw out weak-ass insults, at least try to make them worthwhile.

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh, your BS got exposed and you're not able to come back from this, but instead ignore facts once again and try to lower the level, nice.
Just hold your shit together next time.

1 week ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
1 week ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

All of this is well and good, but what I don't think you're considering is that this isn't a forum post, and Vector is not just saying IN GENERAL that locked giveaways are good. Vector commented on a SPECIFIC giveaway, and their comment simply doesn't apply here. CakeGremlin is right that this is already a locked giveaway and if it was any higher then Vector wouldn't be able to enter, so I'm not really sure what they're bellyaching about.

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why does it not apply?
He's suggesting to you, to do giveaways with a higher level (so people have to do giveaways to increase their level to meet the requirements to enter giveaways with level 4,5 or 6)
It's arguing about a limit, like saying the legal drinking age should be higher and the only thing that Gremlin had to add was, we already have a legal drinking age, which adds nothing to the discussion and which i was mocking him about

Even if Gremlin is right in the parts, which points out the obvious, the more wrong he is in his emotional and highly hypothetical assumptions, but i already covered that part earlier.

1 week ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 1 week ago.

1 week ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for this giveaway!

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thanks

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thanks hope to win it wthog ^_^

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

thanks!

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thanks!

1 week ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You do not have permission to comment on giveaways.