[UPlay] Far Cry 4 GA

I'd loved to give it to you via SG, but in this case.. I'm sorry

By all means, feel free to ask Ubisoft- or EA, or CDR- to add an AP to their client that's similar to what Steam has, and they can be considered for similar functionality. The main issue right now is one of inability for giveaway sites to automatically connect to games or accounts, not of unwillingness to establish such a framework.

That would fall under the category of "misleading giveaway," and you would be penalized for it. Just give the FC4 key in addition to the normal giveaway.

I just meant, I've traded higher CV items for things that were unable to be posted to SG due to API glitches, and I've received higher CV for Groupees greenlight keys (due to the scarcity of certain never-rebundled games, they have high trade value- but due to their typical review outcome, they're not usually good for giveaways). My point wasn't a discussion of profit or exploitation, but that you don't have to feel something is worthless just because it can't be put up for giveaway.
There's a certain gain on SG, for putting up something high-value or unbundled, that isn't reflected in the CV it provides. If you trade off a high profile game, you likely should receive a CV profit on that trade, especially given that you're probably still losing out on CV to purchase price compared to other options out there, anyway. The point isn't exploitation, or even cost-efficency- it's about being able to feel good about your trades and giveaways. As to what that entails, it's different per person, so I felt it worth mentioning.

Another similar example is a free game- it used to be, you could trade those to people for CV-able games, if the free game was high enough interest. That presumably is still true, even though they can now be given away- but before that, it was a good example of the "even though it can't be posted, doesn't mean it can't work out favorably for all involved".

I'm not recommending maximizing CV, or utilizing CV-exploitative games in giveaways. I just like the idea of everyone- gifter, trader, and winner- getting to feel positive about their involvement at the end of the process, and being able to feel that they got a fair outcome.

In review, my original phrasing may have poorly reflected the nature of my sentiments- I apologize for that. I've edited it for better clarity, hopefully it's less misleading on intent now.

you'll also go and remind all those begging for the key about the rules too I trust?

I missed your report about those posts, sorry. Oh wait, you reported no one.