Not only is it an art, but it's the ultimate form of art. I'm not speaking of any games specifically, but generally games are the combination of number of art forms; visual, musical, story, writing, and even game mechanics like AI, gameplay and such are as well a form of art in the broader definition. And to top it all it's all interactive which is almost in any sense better than static. But before you go on and saying that only specific games can be considered art, I'd say that even games like COD are art. Maybe it isn't artist, original or anything special, but just pile of generic stuff. But I'm not here to tell what is art in terms of quality, but simply what can be defined as art. COD is like the equivalent to majority of DA submissions, generics and sometimes shitty, but still technically counts as art.

I am well aware that to many of you this might seem just an obvious thing, but there are still many, even among non-casual gamers, that still think that video games aren't art.

EDIT; The definition of "Art" I used was for art and craft, and not the "Art" as artistic quality.

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Some errors in your text.

I say it depends on the game. Some are art, some are a can of baked beans that some dude tries to sell as art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just woke up, and English isn't my native language. (While I'm not saying it's particularly bad, it's still far from flawless)

And I mentioned it, I only talked about art as definition but not as quality, COD is art like most of DA submission is an art.

EDIT: Now that I check it, I had some really dumb mistakes, I really should've freshened up before writing this.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I saw that. I just stated my own opinion on the subject.

And your English was fine, never would have figured it wasn't a native language before. Just figured I'd mention it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He's right, though. COD is art. Bad art, lazy art, exploitative art, but art nonetheless. My full response, below, explains why.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Absolutely. Games like COD in particular have "art teams" specifically used to create visual appeal.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pity they suck at it...

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I wouldn't say they suck at it. I remember several pretty parts, it was just a shame they weren't all pretty parts.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh god shut up about cod plz.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Excuse me?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I did a presentation about whether or not video games are art. I argued that video games have characteristics of other artistic representations such as a musical, a painting, a movie, or even a book. Some examples are Civ4, Journey having their soundtracks nominated for a Grammy (Civ4's Baba Yetu actually won), how realistic Crysis 3 looks, how in awe you can be while playing Journey, how shocking and not far from reality the war story of Spec Ops: The Lines tells, and how emotionally attached the players can get with Clementine in The Walking Dead.

Game is a form of art, the one that integrates many aspects of other representations. It can be artistically appealing and aesthetically attractive. I think it's fair to say video games are a modern form of art and we the players are its patrons.

this wiki page is also quite helpful :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Play Journey.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't have PS3. :(

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Play Proteus then :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I have it, but as much beautifully artistic it is, It still lacks that one element that drives me; purpose. What I understood about the game that the whole point of it is just walking around and enjoy by the environment and the soundtrack.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"I am well aware that to many of you this might seem just an obvious statement,..."

^this, look at the forum you are in :P

Bastion <3

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bastion indeed. >.<

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

More importantly, are pancakes an ultimate form of art? Or are they just the limit the art has to breach yet?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cooking is an art as well, no? Art technically can be considered anything that is produced by our mind, science for example can't be considered art because it is not the product of our mind, but how we translate science, like different mathematical formulas and such, can be considered art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And what if said pancakes wasn't the product of human mind? What if they are just appeared, created by some superior force we can't even hope to comprehend? Because that's what pancakes do.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I retake my statement, pancakes are the ultimate form of art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

limbo,bastion,the binding of isaac and a lot of more indies, that are a real art not only in the visual soma are because of his amazing soundtrack(to the moon, thomas was alone) others ftom they visual aspect(limbo) an other are a just art in all the ways posibles(bioshcok) yes, i know my english sucks :p

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Great soundtrack and nice graphical style are important part of a game, if you're going to call it art.

Also atmosphere, lore, story and such things are important.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If drawing a picture or making a sculpture is called art, why would making a 3d (or 2d) world filled with music, detail, design and usually a plot, not be called an art?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's what baffles me about, just because the demography it meant for isn't high class intellectuals then it doesn't make it art?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

not this again

these threads are like bloody minefields

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What? what's wrong with this kind of thread. And what you mean 'again'? in all my time in SG I haven't seen a single thread of this kind, of course if I didn't seen one it doesn't mean they didn't exists, but if I didn't see one it means that they aren't frequent enough for "not this again" reply.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I've seen several of these threads asking the exact same question. Do what you want, but I don't think it's a good idea to bring this type of conversation here, because I've found that it usually causes extreme opinions.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just look at Muramasa: the Demon Blade, Odin Sphere, Journey, Bastion or Limbo, these sure are the proof that videogames are art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Of course games can be a form of art. Of course, many games are also not!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

AS I said, many aren't art in quality, but they are art in definition. If you would call generic drawings an art, why wouldn't you call generic games an art?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think he meant same drawing you draw every year to sell it. Art is something you put your heart into, not something you just create to sell. At least that's how I see it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We do not use the same definition of "Art".

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Very practical art, art in which you really have to cooperate with the machine. But art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sure it's art. It's commercial art - much like advertising, or mainstream fashion. The confines of the medium are incredibly heavy as well - you have graphical limitations, economical limitations, time constraints, and more you have to integrate your work with dozens of other people, and try and make the final product look cohesive. While all mediums have inherent limitations, the ones found in video games are particularly invasive. Anyway it's a bit of a non-debate. 99% of games are made to sustain a company and to make waves in a market, so they can only be considered commercial art, which tbh is quite different from fine art.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Completely agree with it, many games are simply produced to catch the attention of mainstream and uses the same trends like in most of games, but there are still huge part of the industry that isn't like that.

But as I said, about COD it is art but not in sense of quality but in sense of definition.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you've ever taken an art philosophy class, a better question might be whether video games are craft rather than art. There's a definite argument there that they can be much of both.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I personally regard craft an art as well, but if you were to break it down into those two categories, then all games are fundamentally are a craft where some of them possess artistic attributes like the many beautifully artistic games, while some other games like COD are basically just a craft and doesn't posses any or close to any artistic attributes.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Is this a question?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's rhetorical question serving as an opening for an argument.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

My girlfriend is doing her honours in Visual Art. We've had this conversation more often than I can count, and her answer is usually "no", with a bit of "hmmm, maybe, sometimes" thrown in.

Her reasoning, and all her fellow classmates' as well, is "because it isn't" which is followed up by "look, you don't study art, so you wouldn't know". (As an FYI, I study accounting and finance).

My 'spanner in the works' comes in when I ask them if movies are considered Art. That sends them into a furious debate that can last hours with no definitive outcome. Furthermore, introducing books into that debate will lead to more people arguing that books are Art and fewer arguing that they aren't.

My logic is then this: paintings and books are more readily accepted as Art simply because of how long they have been around. Movies and games are starting to become accepted as Art as they spend more time in our culture (on a sidenote, they will become accepted much faster due to how advanced technology and communication is in today's age).

So yes, games can be considered Art. Are they the ultimate form of Art though?

Well, that's a lot easier to answer: Art is subjective. Every artist will tell you this, and all of my girlfriend's art buddies agree - art has to have some sort of personal meaning to the person viewing it; a meaning that is different to everyone else.

In this regard, video games create the ultimate subjective experience. Every game - even CoD - has you control someone and make them do something (often, games introduce choices, further immersing our subjective selves into the Art) and we have to decide why or what or how based on our subjective opinions. Whether we do this consciously (ie: Bastion's endings etc) or without thought (ie: a multiplayer FPS) we are still being subjective and affected by it.

Add to that the care and passion some creators put into their work and I don't think you could argue against games being art.

It has taken my girlfriend nearly two years to start seeing this. I'm quite nervous for when I try and persuade her that cars and engines can be Art too. I think we may break up.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think you can put your differences behind you.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Again, commercial vs. fine art. The majority of games are made to sell, and they're completely constructed from compromises both as a result of this and other things. They lack the subtlety, the purpose, the details of fine art. And their success or failure is measured entirely on how many millions they sell. You really can't put most of them into the same category as fine art. Same goes for movies or books - the Transformers films or some famous sportsman's autobiography don't count as art, clearly. They're made purely to appeal to large masses - easily digestible, and ultimately shallow. Instead you can look at films like Grizzly Man or books like Kafka on the Shore as art. They're intricately crafted to evoke pure emotion, and there's nothing superfluous about them.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree with you completely: for games and movies in particular, bottom line revenue is the goal. And they do lose a lot of artistic merit in the process.

But the idea of the medium of games being the highest form of Art holds: even though it's purposes are generally commercial, a video game has the potential to offer the best artistic experience.

Unfortunately, many people lack the skills/experiences/state of mind/whatever to appreciate a good book or movie and it's in this regard that a game stands out - it allows for a much more submersive and subjective experience.

Maybe I should make it clear that I'm talking about the potential a video game as an artistic medium offers - the reality of the CoDs, Need for Speeds, Fifas is a lot different to what could be achieved.

On the plus side, with indie development becoming more widespread, and digital distribution making it a lot easier for anyone to pick up a game and play, I think that this potential may be unlocked in future years.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I agree that games have more potential than has been explored until now. I've always thought of games as having the potential to become the most involved medium of all. Having said that I don't agree that it gives it the potential to be the "best" artistic experience. Art is limitless, and despite that we've been making art and literature and music for so long, there's still more to explore. We're hardly at the end of the road for any of those mediums. And besides, what counts as "best" anyway? Immersion or sensory overload would just present a different experience I would say. Just because an artist has more or fewer tools to work with, it doesn't mean his work has more or less artistic integrity. Actually the best artists use those "limits" to their advantage.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Anything produced by our mind is technically art, so yeah cars and engines are technically an art, the production of the car and the engine would be craft but idea the engine and the car is built on is an art. But conflicting philosophical views should be the drive for a break up, so I would suggest against trying to debate about those stuff.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Art is in the eye of the beholder.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

True words. But I was speaking not of the quality or meaning, but of the the definition.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the definition would be also subjective, so if you find games to be a form of art they become art to you because you choose it to be so.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yes

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It all depends on the definition. For some people art is only stuff like paintings. Others include music. Yet again others include movies too.
I for one think art is everything that a human creates as an interpretation of the world around him/her. As it involves creativity and thought process and the already mentioned interpretation of the surroundings I think it would be very close minded to say only few things are art. So I for one include video games to my definition of art too. Of course some games are more art (Final Fantasy) than others (Call Of Duty) but it's all art in it's own way.
(When I say "more art" I mean that it shows a bigger variety of things and has a lot more to offer)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As I said in a different post; "Cooking is an art as well, no? Art technically can be considered anything that is produced by our mind, science for example can't be considered art because it is not the product of our mind, but how we translate science, like different mathematical formulas and such, can be considered art."

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well yeah, it depends on how it's done. I'd say when people make sculptures out of food or present the dish in a special way it's a type of art too. As for formulas...maybe if it's with a weird font and rainbow colors xD
It's really all just definitions and conventions.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't perceive art as just something visual, art is the idea itself produced by our mind, what you create using that idea is a craft, something physical. Math is partially an art without a craft.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I see where you come from. But for me, art is the result. And it must in some way be perceivable for more than just the creator.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ok, in that case replace all my "art" words with "art(1)", if the only what conflicts are the words and not the definition with try to present with those words than there's no conflict. :P

The definition of "art" that you talk about is different than the definition of "art". I talk about art(1) which is just art and craft, simply just everything people create, the art(2)that you talk about is that of observing and analyzing creation of others, the words conflict but the definition are of two different things so they don't conflict.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Elaborate.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Elaborate even more.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They have the potential to be art, just like movies have the potential to be art as well.
To me considering something art is like giving it a trophy/medal. You can't go on giving everything woula trophy/medal because game/movie/album is amazing. It wouldn't be fair.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was using "Art" as a definition, not as a quality.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well that's even harder.
Art, like "fun" and "good",ect is a very broad thing to define which and is very opinionated.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, "Art" as in the product of our mind and its craft.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

*grabs popcorn*

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You might be disappointed at the lack of extremely conflicting opinions here. Well, except the COD part.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by Necroblight.