156 Comments - Last post 34 seconds ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
9 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by BattleChaing
11 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by xvt
1,961 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Gamy7
1,042 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sensualshakti
12 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by DeliberateTaco
769 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by OwieczkaDollyv21
53 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Masafor
44 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by herbesdeprovence
9 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by insideAfireball
99 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by herbesdeprovence
1,050 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by MayoSlice
94 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by insideAfireball
2,226 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Flygonite
Original article
Steam group announcement
Whats really baffling me personally in the whole story is the number of people actively defending the creators who were effectively doing stolen assets (for which they had zero authorisation from the original da artist). I mean really? I highly doubt that they didnt knew the origins of the original artwork and even if they did, ignorance is not an excuse to break rules
The question shouldnt be whose the most guilty from said contributors but the fact that they had to sign an agreement as a workshop contributor, which indeed includes legal liability too. Its sad to see that at the end of the day, everybody is more concerned about how to profit off everything, be it legal or illegal, even though some idiots put Valve in quite a serious legal problem and you can be sure that they wont give their backs for idiots who are unable to understand how basic copyright works.
Hopefully that will serve as a lesson for everybody, even though its quite sad that it had to go as far. Its basically going down the way as steam tags did-when we cant have nice things thanks for a few idiots who ruins it for everybody
Comment has been collapsed.