I am curious what the blue dot and the grey dot mean on the chances to win stats section. Anyone know?

For anyone, if I reply to your answer with a question, I am not arguing, just trying to understand.

GA in the comments somewhere.

8 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

blue - historical
grey - projected

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

what is historical?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Past

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lol I know what historical means, but how is it determined? For instance there is only 1 April 21st 2016. What historical data are they using?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Even a minute in tjhe past of the same day is historical of 1 april?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The amount of your entered giveaways that ended on that day and the amount of people in each of them.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think I just don't understand. I'll just move along. Thanks for trying to help me all. Have a giveaway if you don't have it yet.

https://www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/lip6X/puzzle-agent

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Bump for CV

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Okay, let me try again.

You enter giveaways all the time, right? Each of them run for a different amount of time.
The statistic looks at your list of entered giveaways. Then for, let's say, it check which one of those ended on April 2nd. For an example, you entered 20 giveaways that ended between 0:00 and 23:59 of April 2nd.
Then, it checks individually how many people entered those giveaways. Let's say all of them had exactly 100 people entering for the game.
So, it calculates that you had 1% chance to win one of the giveaways. Then it adds the chance to win the second giveaway, and the third, and so on. So altogether you had 20×1=20% chance to win at least one of those giveaways on that exact date.

Same goes for long-term predictions. The site checks which giveaways will end on a certain future date, let's say tomorrow, and checks the current number of entries in them. So if you entered for 10 giveaways that will end tomorrow with currently exactly 100 people in them as well, the site predicts you have 10×1% chance to win something tomorrow.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I get that part I think. That is the grey dot.

I don't get what is different about the blue dot. Chances of winning is the chances of winning. For instance I have a 34% chance (blue) and a 41% chance (grey) today. What confuses me is how there could be 2 difference chances. The guy above said historical (which doesn't make sense that there even could be historical data).

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Blue part are the giveaways that already ended today, grey is the ones that are still running but will end later today. The calculation for them is the same.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hostrical means percentage of winning determined by how many giveaways you entered and your chances in each entry.
For example if you entered one giveaway in the past 30 days and the giveaway had less than 100 entries. Then your blue dot will say something like %1 winning

That's how I understand it, might be wrong though.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

blue - finished GAs with your entries, calculated win rates
grey - giveaways already entered, but not finished

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If the GA's are finished it should be 0%, no?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, because it tells you what were your odds, not the outcome.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That makes more sense. thanks.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Last winrate value before roll the winner, counts for blue graph.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That makes more sense. thanks to you both.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow, a much more complicated explanation was needed than I provided :(

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually your explanation summed it up accurately, though the actual scenario did warrant some elaboration.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yea. nothing wrong with your explanation. I just don't get it.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 7 years ago by kretonbadge.