I prefer Vanilla games

I prefer Strawberry.

Me like straciatella games.

For me it's play the game it was meant to be played first, then mod the hell out of it. Not that I personally mod...but I'm willing to use mods from the community as soon as I finish the game.

BTW, I like Cookies & Cream :)

it depends, diablo 2 felt the same with mods specially median XL

Good to know.

Oh god, stop those trolling comments.

I prefer chocolate games. <3

I always do bug fix mods for any game and graphics mods if it's an older game. Also just general improvements that aren't necessarily bug fixes. As well as content that devs were part of the way finished with but that didn't get added in the final release. Aside from those I also prefer not to mod. Content mods always seem lackluster compared to vanilla content. There are some exceptions though.

You have to use mods on Bethesda games to get rid of the bugs they were too lazy to fix

I feel the same way. However, I know of at least two people who'll mod away spiders and such if they can - and I can understand that.
I can also understand people who modded e.g. Skyrim to be able to craft arrows or similar.

I liek turtlz

As fun as Minecraft is, it can get stale after a while. For that reason I do use some mods such as tekkit or FTB for the extra gameplay options, but I do flip between vanilla and modded. I think Minecraft is the only game I play modified though.

How do you feel about official DLCs that bring changes to main game in some cases? It is not user mods and if you buy "complete pack" it will be activated regardless of your desire, so you will never be able to expirience "vanilla" game.

Raspberry Ripple, every time.

I like chocolate chip.

Well, I prefer to play my Skyrim with mods! :D

I used to do that... then I saw the "Unofficial Skyrim Patch" mod that fixes the game-breaking bugs and said "Oh, well, fuck it." or something along those lines. :P

PS: Coconut ftw!

Ars Ignis is made my a Romanian team named Vanilla Software.

I modded New Vegas, but not with any gameplay changes, just bug fixes and the GUI. Might add one quest but that's it.

Nope. Mods ftw!

I always play Vanilla first, to get the intended experience. Then some things start bugging me and I try to mod them, or to find mods that fix them. But I don't often use mods that change a ton of things, as I find they always have some features that I don't want. I prefer a modular approach, with mini-mods that handle 1 specific thing each.

Also, I almost never use mods that add graphics or extra units/buildings/techs/stuff. My interest in modding is based on changing what's already in the game so it works better, not in stuffing the game with tons of stuff that probably doesn't belong there.

Edit: I like caramel.

Sniper: Ghost warrior 1 is unplayable on vanilla :(

I like my games with copious amounts of netorare.

I always mod my games when I able to, especially if it's Bethesda games. I'm very picky though, most of my mods only are for bugfix, visual enhancements, gameplay fix, nothing more. Especially Skyrim. That game has way too many things that can be improved but Bethesda give that job to the modders instead. E.g. stupid NPC and followers, unreasonable rich bandits with high-leveled loot, etc.
I tend to keep away from mods that adds way too many new items like weapons and armors, although it's the recommended one.

I play almost every game on Vanilla. I have no interest in mods - I try them after I've completed the game, but they never add anything to the game in my eyes. The one exception is Skyrim - oddly enough I hate that game, but there's a couple of mods that make it playable.

I always play it first without mods, for instance for skyrim I first completed the main quest and most of the cool quests in vanilla, when I got bored of it, I started modding it