I'd go with the HD7870 in this case. It performs very close to the GTX760 (though the latter is undoubtedly better for gaming), but costs much less.
Though I suppose if you're interested in both of those games the GTX bundle would be a good choice.
Comment has been collapsed.
Elaborate maybe? Tests have shown that the new Radeon cards don't have any significant improvements compared to older cards.
Comment has been collapsed.
I use this site for comparison. Not too sure how accurate it is, but it seems both cards are extremely similar. So if you can get both for the same price, go for the 760 with the games you want i guess.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm not sure which 7870 was tested here though, there are many different versions but based on this the 760 should be a tad better. However, probably depending on the region you live too, the 760 is about 25% to 50% more expensive, while the performance increase is not as significant as you can see. In the end I think this is just an issue of whatever you prefer personally.
I for one recently got the 7870. The special ASUS version with a few extra clocks and special cooler and stuff. It runs everything fluently on 2560x1440 for me even with AA and all that. And since AMD is pushing out the new R9 series the prices for that card are dropped massively. So I'd suggest you to get a 7870.
Comment has been collapsed.
This website is purely theory and no actual statistic to back it up. It compares clock rates and not what the card actually performs with. It also doesn't compare the difference between how shader cores work on AMD vs Nvidia. It used to work, back pre 2008, but not so much anymore.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's why I mentioned that it runs all games fluently in 2560x1440 resolution here, with AA. Considering how little money you have to pay for that GPU, it's really a bargain.
Comment has been collapsed.
You can find a comparative performance chart here.
I also suggest you to look for benchmarks specific to the games you are going to play, since there can be surprises.
The new R9 AMD cards will get Mantle support. How this will be beneficial is still to be seen (Battlefield 4 will be the first to get the support, in December).
NVidia cards will get G-Sync, but this requires a monitor that supports it, so if you don't have a change of monitor in sight, you don't have to worry about it for now.
Comment has been collapsed.
I suggest the 760. They'll perform AA at similar performance hits, but with the 760 bringing more overall performance, FPS should still be higher than the 7870 regardless of settings.
From what I can read, the 760 is currently coming with a free copy of Batman Arkham Origins. The AC4/SCB (and 50 USD off Shield price) deal will replace it for the 2013 holiday season. Wait until confirmation before making a purchase, and double check with the place you're buying from.
I can currently buy a GeForce 760 for 260 USD, or a Radeon HD 7870 for 170 USD. What I buy between these two depends on if the 760 is less than 30% more expensive than the 7870 once December comes. It currently costs 50% more than a 7870 while providing less than 50% performance increase over the 7870, making the 7870 the best choice per dollar.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
So you're saying the 7870 has no gaming performance or what? And why would one buy such a card anyways if you weren't going for gaming performance? I doubt he wants to use it for hacking purposes as he mentioned games and seriously he wouldn't need to ask here then. And as mentioned, the increase in performance doesn't stand in a good ratio to the price.
Comment has been collapsed.
So guess what guys, I made a decision! I finally settled on a Sapphire Dual-X 2GB R9 270x! Awesomely enough, I managed to snag the last one they had in stock, and it even comes with Battlefield 4! Not that I personally care about Battlefield, but I'm selling it to a coworker for $40.
Comment has been collapsed.
buy a GTX 760, Splinter cell blacklist, Assassins Creed 4 Black Flag free. Will easily run games in 1080P for 2-3 years. You get nvidia physx and Geforce experience where all the installed games are detected and optimised graphics settings are applied automatically. And you get shadowplay, and it's just an amazing video recording software that utilises the Nvidia GPU encoder. I am using a GTX 660 and i love it.
Comment has been collapsed.
They're about equal in performance despite the 60 USD price difference. I'd go with the 7870, or add another (at minimum) 10-20 USD and pick up a 7970 for around 25% fps boost in today's more demanding games over the GTX 760. For the money, you could probably pick up a Radeon HD 7970 within your budget during the sales between now and christmas. If you get lucky, an R9 280X.
Keep an eye on the GTX 770 if you want to wait for a sale and stay with Nvidia, but the AMD R9 280X will still match its performance for a lower price.
Historically Nvidia's been better with driver support, but AMD's just flying lately. Dunno why. Maybe their R7 and R9 line, while Nvidia's investing heavily into the mobile market - Tegra FTW.
A few months ago, AMD only had lockdown on the budget-range cards as far as being price-to-performance ratio while Nvidia was what every serious gamer with deep pockets would reach for top-shelf. Today though, even the Nvidia Titan is beat by AMD cards at half the price. Nvidia's only Titan killer, the GTX 690, is as expensive as the Titan, while AMD's R9 290 and R9 290X are half the price for better ultra-preset performance.
Consider saving your money until this holiday season really gets into full swing and we see steep sales. Then check out benchmarks for the cards you're considering buying, make a few comparison tables, and pick out the best bang for your buck.
Comment has been collapsed.
It seems to depend on A) the retailer/e-tailer and B) the card manufacturer. Sapphire's Dual-X R9 270X from NewEgg--NewEgg Canada, anyway--does indeed include it. I'd suggest checking the product page from whatever site you end up purchasing from, as it should specify whether it comes with BattleField 4 or not.
I actually have no interest in Battlefield 4 myself, so I ended up selling the card to a coworker.
Comment has been collapsed.
3 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Carenard
24 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Dandey
1,038 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sensualshakti
43 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ZPE
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Sh4dowKill
1,950 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lessmessino
6 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by quijote3000
549 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by n0humor
16 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by insideAfireball
2,062 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by jiggakills
3,423 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by ba2
73 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by HitHard
442 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by tubberware
30 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by lycankai
My wife is apparently buying me a new video card for Yule, with a budget of between $200-$250. I'd initially told her to go with an HD 7870--I've had an HD 7770 for just over a year now, and it has served me well thus far--but I just read about Geforce bundling 760's with Assassin's Creed IV and Splinter Cell: Blacklist, which is rather enticing. AMD also bundles games with their cards, but I own literally every game they're offering (with the exception of Dirt, like I give a fuck about those games), so I'm thinking of going with the Geforce card.
Basically, which is the better card, in terms of performance? Sure, the free games are great, but they won't mean much if the 760 isn't sexy enough to be running games for the next year or two.
EDIT 1: We ended up snagging NewEgg.ca's last (in-stock) Sapphire Dual-X 2GB R9 270x with Battlefield 4 for $209.99 CDN!
EDIT 2: My video card arrived in a mere two business days! If anyone's curious about the 270X's performance, I'm now able to run every game in my library on Ultra settings. This includes Far Cry 3, Batman: Arkham Origins, BioShock Infinite, and The Witcher 2.
The Witcher 2 will actually even run with Ubersampling enabled, though the framerate is a bit choppy. With Ubersampling off, the game still looks absolutely gorgeous, and runs silky-smooth at almost 60 frames per second. Here's a screenshot to show how good it looks. Seriously, look at those flames!
Comment has been collapsed.