Thanks for the feedback in the previous discussion, we're revising the sensitive subjects and events guideline to the following...

Military conflicts. Military conflicts that are causing a hostile and divisive environment throughout our community at a scale that makes other methods of moderation ineffective or infeasible. At the moment we will be closing discussions and potentially removing comments pertaining to...

  • Israel-Hamas war
  • Russia-Ukraine war

Many users thought the previous guideline was too vague and could potentially impact any type of sensitive subject in the community which caused debate between a few individuals. That was never the intention and I don't think I conveyed that message well. We reviewed the recent discussions about the Israel-Hamas war and believed they were creating an unusual challenge as further explained below. A decision was made to have them closed. We then looked back more closely at the Ukraine awareness topic to see if we could justify leaving that discussion open. We couldn't do so after seeing the vast amount of links to inappropriate content, depicting injury and death, both in the OP and unfolding within the comments.

When writing the original guideline, I tried to keep it more broad. If I didn't foresee these conflicts creating such an issue for the community today, then perhaps another subject could cause similar trouble in the future. I was aware this could raise some concerns about over-moderation. I mentioned to the support members that we would only be closing topics about the above two conflicts and that individually we could not make the decision to use the new rule to moderate other subjects. If years from now another unexpected event took place in the world, causing similar consequences, then it would have been covered and we would have had the ability to react quickly. In retrospect, it wasn't the right choice to leave the phrasing vague for the sake of covering a hypothetical situation that is unlikely to happen. Instead, we'll look more closely at the two events causing the issue right now and focus the guideline on what they have in common. That is why the guideline is now targeted specifically at military conflicts.

As noted, we will only be covering the two conflicts on the list at the moment. If another military conflict occurs in years to come, we'll first see how the community is capable of discussing it, and if other guidelines are able to keep the conversations civil and productive. If not, only then will we consider adding the conflict to the list. As topics on the list become less heated and when they are not developing on a daily basis, they will be revisited to see if they can be safely removed from the list.

Why is moderating military conflicts different than other topics?

  1. They contain an unusually high amount of inappropriate and graphic content depicting the horrors of war. I am not suggesting this content has no value but it has reached a level where I do not feel comfortable with the moderation team reviewing it. In the past few days, a couple of moderators have shared the impact that seeing these images and reading these comments has had on them, and I believe it is important that we take it seriously.
  2. The discussions contain a level of hostility that I haven't seen in the decade we've existed as a community.
  3. It places the entire community at risk due to relationships with our partners. We have received messages from services we depend on regarding this content. Even if we use our best judgment when moderating, it's a fine line to walk as one of our partners could believe that we are supporting terrorism or condoning the war in Ukraine, and this could lead to the collapse of the community. This was very close to happening earlier this year.

We'll try to use our other guidelines to keep conversations that are indirectly related to these conflicts on track (e.g. a Humble Bundle raising money for victims). However, if we think a user is trying to use their post as a clever means of circumventing the above rule to provoke others regarding these conflicts, then we will close their discussion or remove their comment.

I hope this helps to clarify the decision-making process behind these changes and how the guideline will be applied to the site.

6 months ago

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

With all due respect, isn't that a bit melodramatic?

Aren't there just better platforms to raise awareness like Reddit, Social Media e.t.c.

For most gaming is a way to escape reality, we have the other platforms to debate and raise awareness for world conflicts.

Isn't the point of this site to gift games to others that you have no use for?
I understand that there's a big community here, that interacts but some topics are better for other platforms.

The Wars have nothing to do with games or gifting games.

Just my two cents.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Again very melodramatic and emotional

Nothing I said was with any intent to insult you
and now here you go cursing me out with emotions running high

I can't believe you're so upset over a thread being put down on a gifting site.
There are thousands of forums where you can have mutiple threads regarding your topic.

Maybe you're living in a wonderland where the closure of a thread has made you lose your mind.

You're not the only one affected by war
Most of us have been and have our own trauma
I've actually served and fought in one for over an year

"You are a disgrace to call oneself "satan" because no satanist will ever condone any form of censorship."

There's a right place for everything

If I want to share my awareness and trauma on the war I was a part of
Why would I do it on a game gifting site of all places...

I know you put in a lot effort in that thread, and I'm sorry for how it turned out.

Keep your two cents, hope you come right and realize it isn't that big of a deal and life goes on.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You wouldn't be emotional, if your homecountry is being attacked?

Why would I do it on a gaming gifting site of all places...

There all sorts of stories people sharing about their IRL here, i guess you can ask them the same question

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"There all sorts of stories people sharing about their IRL here, i guess you can ask them the same question"
We are talking about war and military conflict posts here you melon

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

leaving the relevant question unanswered

We are talking

Let me correct you once again. You
OP of this sub-thread isn't about war and military conflict
https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/yoMGVY1

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't be afraid, it wasn't your actions.
It's just me being allergic to BS, which urges me to write.

get well soon

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Here's where you're ignorant and not understanding the reason why the decision was taken

A war or military conflict has two sides
Innocent lives are lost on both
Both sides have people who endure trauma

If one side raises awareness here
the other has every right too aswell

That's where the problem lies

That endless loop of moderation and keeping things clean.

Which would lead to mods spending more time on forum posts then actual disputes and issues related to the gifting side of the site.

Because neither side is entirely wrong and both have the right to grieve their loss
.
I hope you understand why it was taken down

I'm sorry about your loss of the thread, hope you get over it before two weeks time.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If one side raises awareness here
the other has every right too aswell

thing is, we suggested to russian trolls to create their own thread several times, but they never did and always came shitting in the Ukraine thread and that was the sole reason it got so heated there once in a while

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm sorry, I have to disagree. russia has invaded Ukraine, and has been terrorizing the native population in the places it could reach. There can be no doubt who is wrong in this conflict. If somebody still thinks russians had a good reason for doing all the things they did - I can honestly say I have no respect for that person, because they are either really following russian propaganda, or pushing it themselves.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Don't think you understand. People know each other here - it really is a community and many people are friends. Why would anyone want to discuss such painful topics with strangers on dumpster fire sites like Twitter or Reddit if they could talk about it with people they feel an actual connection with? I think your reaction lacks a measure of empathy and understanding and I don't believe that you have read or participated in the Ukraine thread, so why do you feel the need to comment on the distress of someone who was obviously deeply involved and invested with it?
The 'solution' is terrible. Letting the thread run for a year and a half amounts to a tacit acknowledgement that it was acceptable and of value to the community. Closing it abruptly without at least first offering the OP a chance to address whatever was found to be problematic is heavy handed and demonstrates an unwillingness to explore better solutions that might accommodate more people than just you.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Lacks Empathy? Come on Melisand
I was repectful and polite and he went for me hurling abuses and got a response appropriate for this reply. and I still didn't stoop to foul language like they did

I said I'm sorry for what happened to them and how it happened

but the world isn't perfect and going forward these conflict posts are going to get even more out of control and hectic

I stand with the decision that it isn't a good idea have those posts on the forum
Just like you stand with the idea of having them

Just like he stood for Ukraine
others for Russia

The guy for Palestine
and others for Israel

It's a never ending loop of who's right who's wrong
and it was getting uglier by the day

With a sensitive and serious topic like Military conflicts it gets even harder to moderate
X amount died tor side A: here is news and images provinf it
X amount died for side B which is greater than side A

I'm just saying it's the right decision and tried to make that individual understand the reason behind why that category isn't a good idea

I did show empathy they didn't

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the right decision would have been banning trolls, but i think i'm talking to a wall here

why did the others who stood for russia didn't created their own thread?

why did the guy for Palestine confessed being pro-Hamas?

so many questions...

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Everyone with a different opinion than yours is a "troll"

Lets make the mods spend hours going through tickets to ban these trolls that are growing jn number by the day because they are the opposition

Ukraine Awakeness Poster = not troll
Palestine Awareness Poster = troll

You don't think mods had
Pro Russia
Pro Ukraine
Pro Israel
Pro Palestine
Tickets to deal with???

What's the logic here
you're as clever as a brick wall if that's your solution

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh we had enough posters in the Ukraine Awareness thread, who were trolls
https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/oWUERf8

Lets make the mods spend hours going through tickets to ban these trolls that are growing jn number by the day because they are the opposition

very suggestive or do you have any sort of proof for your claims?
otherwise i consider it as your personal opinion

and again leaving relevant questions unanswered

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In regards to your comment on people knowing each other here

When it comes to sensitive topics like this
Not just the active community but the non active community will also participate

It wouldn't be a small discussion with friends that know each other
Everyone will give their thoughts and most won't in the right way
which literally was a factor in the decision taken in the OP
because it was getting out of hand

In that year and a half you mentioned this site has grown too and has sponsors
Decisions like this are taken when things and circumstances change

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I never said you weren't polite.

  • isn't that a bit melodramatic?
    Again very melodramatic and emotional
    I can't believe you're so upset over a thread being put down on a gifting site.
    Maybe you're living in a wonderland where the closure of a thread has made you lose your mind.
    You're not the only one affected by war*

There's more.
Pretty insensitive things to say to a person who is clearly very upset. Negating another person's feelings is is exactly that - lack of empathy.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You're missing out the fact that he cursed me out immediately after the first comment
which he deleted and my response was very rational and respectful compared to his deleted ones

Dude is literally telling me to Fuck off and I should feel empathy towards his feelings
He was the aggressor not me
You can't compile my replies without the context of his and paint me as the asshole.

Isn't him hurling insults at me insensitive to me? I'm a victim of war like he was.

Talk about double standards, not fair play melisand

I understand your point and I did apologize and offer my sorry in those replies which you failed to compile in your comment

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just going to end it off
I don't intend to spend all day here
to everyone who replied and I replied to: you can add me and we can talk, I don't have grudges or hate towards any of you and I'm sure we can all become good friends down the road.

I owe CG nothing, don't even know them or have had any conversation with them

His decision is the right one, I stand by that.

This community is growing and is hard to moderate

How do you expect him to keep everyone happy it's ridiculous.
Some agree & some don't

but this decision doesn't hurt anyone all it does is stops things from getting ugly to an extent.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 months ago.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"With all due respect, isn't that a bit melodramatic?"
You led with that.

"What is the problem with with all due respect?
It is rare when a positive statement is made following “With all due respect.” As a result, when this phrase is used, the other party becomes immediately defensive and irritated. A vicious attack-defense spiral has been initiated that is difficult to break though."

Google it if you still don't understand how passive aggressive this phrase can be.

And there's nothing positive about telling someone who is distressed that they are being melodramatic. It's just strange to me that you can't acknowledge that and still insist that you were being empathetic.

Yes, he reacted badly, but you wound him up.

I don't know why you are holding on to the high ground here. You don't really have it. I see his apology for his behavior - don't see yours.
Respond if you must but I am done here.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's easy to "go off" when you have strong feelings about a thing and someone comes along and immediately invalidates them. I admire that you had the grace to apologize for your reactions.
I hear you. I am sitting here wondering what we are supposed to do if/when WW3 breaks (seems imminent these days). Are we supposed to not talk about that when it affects, literally, all of us?
I am sorry that you are leaving and I do wish that you would stay. You have contributed so much here.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A China-Taiwan conflict would be a very different beast as nobody in their right mind could claim it's a non gaming related topic when supply for all the bleeding edge chips in our beloved gizmos suddenly dries up. Sorry for my cynicism

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just wanted to let you know that I fully agree with your comments in this topic. Kudos for being a calm and reasonable person, cheers

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Do you have any intention to act against the autojoin epidemic?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Are auto-joiners more problematic than multi-accounters?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd say yes and they are easier to spot.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Then I'm all for that being abolished first.
cg should make a PSA for this shit if they ever get around to acting on it.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Is it because they leave multiple of the same exact comment on your giveaways?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That are the stupid and/or inexperienced ones only.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I was going to say, when I first joined, I thought that was the custom, but I realized later people didn't like that. I mean I didn't know better at the time. Curious as to which methods you use as I'd like to check my recent giveaways too.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There's no secret sauce involved. When an account enters multiple giveaways in the same split second you don't have to be Sherlock.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Right but how do you track that because the time entered generally shows a minute and above I think? Or you make two giveaways and instantly look in the first 1 minute it's live at both who joins for their seconds?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Please understand that I don't want to give the whole modus operandi away as this might be used by those members who violate the rules to cover their tracks. Furthermore there are a lot of people more competent than I am on this topic.
All I can say is it's extremely unfair to the honest members as their chances of winning are affected negatively and one reason why closed groups are popular.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

A person in a group can still be an auto-joiner though. Also it's not so easy to determine auto-joiners, it's easy to find suspects. Only one easy way I can think of which auto-joiners don't waste their points. Someone can only enter their wishlisted games and can still be an auto-joiner too.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

There absolutely are dead giveaways of people being autojoiners even if they think they're being smart about it. But it takes time to report these users in a way that shows 100% proof, and the tickets are either not handled or the punishment is too light and they continue being autojoiners after that...

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

By dead giveaways you mean shovelware that no one wants?
If there is 100% proof shouldn't they be permabanned or at least be suspended long term?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If there is 100% proof shouldn't they be permabanned or at least be suspended long term?

They get 2 or 3 suspensions, depending on the handling mod, before they see a permanent one.
And the permanent suspensions on sg means 1 year. After this time they come back -or at least a part...-.

The first suspensions are jokes with a few days and 80% of them directly autojoin again, without a "safety" pause or a real change, because they know the punishments are a joke.

To collect all the evidences manual, without server side access and tools, take for 3 cases more as 1 year.
So in the end the hunters spend more lifetime as the punishment is in the "best" case.

[I done all the hunting stuff, evidences collecting etc. for years, so i know it very well]

Only multiaccounting brings directly a "perma" suspension (and after 1 year they are allowed back with one of their accounts).

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I see. So it's like "so much labor so little reward" kinda thing, which is sad.

Do you think detecting (and banning) autojoiners can be automated on the server side? (Asking this because I have no experience about hunter stuff.)

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Do you think detecting (and banning) autojoiners can be automated on the server side?

Yes, in big parts.

https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/h9RxE/autojoin-suspensions
That result was AFTER all that got catched got 2x warnings and they needed to click the message, so the autojoiner owners seen both warnings.
So the result (1,6k) were first at the 3rd warning.

CG have all.
His time investment would be a few minutes max. a few hours.
Compare that to many thousand hours that users and mods invest for a fraction of the result, because they don't have help from his side.
It's like as he spit all helping ones in the face because in the end cg don't value the time that others invest, he don't try to reduce the workload of someone, he don't care.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmm, so if there is a math to that, a bot can do most of the job easily. Mods only would have to look at false suspensions, and even that can be prevented with looser settings on the bot since machines don't forgive.

That 1,6k suspensions happened only once or does he do this time to time? Also, even if running a bot on server requires a big CPU power, a weekly run still would be good in my opinion, maybe even monthly. Better than nothing I guess.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He done it one time, for this 2 weeks timeframe, 5 years ago and then never again.....

And that is the reason why so many of us, that help(ed) the site are so frustrated/annoyed, some mods included.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I see why it is frustrating now, no one would wants their labor be in vain. Especially when they are doing this just for the community.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Dead giveaways" is an idiom. I meant to say that there exists uncontestable proof of someone being an autojoiner. And I don't mean "same second clicks" by that. I will not openly write the clues here though. All I'll say is it takes time to write those reports while mods and admins don't take it seriously anyway.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh I see. If proofs can be gathered without the server side data, that means it can be relatively easy to automate by the server side. I don't know about those proofs (and I do wonder what kind of things they are) but I understand that it's better to not share them publicly.

If proofs are uncontestable, maybe they should be a little harsher against autojoiners.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

When an account enters multiple giveaways in the same split second you don't have to be Sherlock.

You need to be a little careful when coming to that conclusion and I wouldn't encourage people to pull out the pitchforks when they see two entries in the same second. I can think of a handful of ways you could see that happening without an autojoiner.

  1. Some of the moderators mentioned Ctrl+W for entering giveaways. The shortcut closes the active browser tab. So, you open up multiple giveaways, click the enter button on the first giveaway, push Ctrl+W, click to enter the next, Ctrl+W, etc. It's easy to enter multiple giveaways in the same second using that method. Other shortcuts for moving between tabs can work a similar way.
  2. People can be quick with their mouse. For example, right now I tried clicking one enter button, clicking the next browser tab, and clicking the next enter button. It took a few tries, but I did manage to enter two giveaways in the same second that way.
  3. Someone could open multiple giveaways, their network connection could drop and be reconnecting as they cycle through the tabs entering those giveaways, and then all of the entries will go through at once when the connection is reestablished. This could result in a high number of entries in the same second.
  4. The SG database could be temporarily locked or sluggish. Once again, this could mean a user slowly enters multiple giveaways and they are all inserted at once.
  5. There are add-ons for SG that allow people to manually enter giveaways faster.
6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Acknowledged, but I'm still waiting for a definite answer to my question.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

he just explained to us, that if it looks like fish and smells like fish it's probably chicken and these same split second cases are just happy little accidents, of course no one uses a auto-joiner Kappa

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

(NB: personal opinion again) I very much agree the split-second entry pattern is a poor indicator.
First, because as explained in details, human users can have that pattern for a lot of reasons.
Second, because making a bot wait between each click is both obvious and trivial. More trivial than parsing an HTML page and sending GETs and POSTs, at least.
And third, I wouldn't go as far as to say entering giveaways super fast is more human than slowly, but think about this: who gets the feeling that they're in a hurry to spend their points quickly before going back to other, funnier activities (like chatting on the forums 👀): a machine or a human?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

who gets the feeling that they're in a hurry to spend their points quickly before going back to other, funnier activities (like chatting on the forums 👀): a machine or a human?

machines having fun :D
of course a machine will do it as fast as it can

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

of course a machine will do it as fast as it can

Actually no, the machine will do it like the programmers tell it to do:

I made a discovery today. I found a computer. Wait a second, this is cool. It does what I want it to. If it makes a mistake, it's because I screwed it up. Not because it doesn't like me...

(quoted from The Conscience of a Hacker, for those who want a bit of computer history reading)

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How about to scrutinize members of this Steam group for a start?
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/autojoin
Automatically enter Steamgifts.com giveaways and more

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

How about to scrutinize members of this Steam group for a start?

I'm not part of the bot-hunting crew, but that looks like a solid idea, yes

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I checked that group page and the addon mentioned there can be used to simplify joining giveaways - and that way also making it possible to join several giveaways very fast - even without using the autojoin feature. So simply being a member in that group or even installing that addon still doesn't mean rules are broken.

If I had the need to autojoin giveaways (which I don't), I'd simply make a Windows macro outside of the browser and absolutely nobody would be able to detect that. It's very probable some people do that already.

Using the same "thank you for the chance" note on every giveaway is also not an indicator of anything, copy+pasting is one of the first things people learn when using computers.

What makes me curious are those multi-accounters mentioned here, I had the impression that one Steam account can only have one account in SG since some unique ID is used to recognize the user. Is this not the case?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Using the same "thank you for the chance" note on every giveaway is also not an indicator of anything,

The autojoiner program have a "thanks script" that can be activated and the dumbest ones do this.
So spamming thanks messages all the time is a strong indicator for a autojoiner use and is, of course, one evidence and can't be the only one to suspend someone.
I would say 90% of the repeated, same, comments, in public GAs, are autojoiner messages and not copy + paste ones.
[I checked last year around 200 - 400 GAs daily to collect evidences...so i think i know from what i speak]

What makes me curious are those multi-accounters mentioned here, I had the impression that one Steam account can only have one account in SG since some unique ID is used to recognize the user. Is this not the case?

It is the case but using more as one steam account aren't a problem.

The biggest botfarm (multiaccounter + autojoiner) that a mod and i catched together had 210 accounts.
""Only"" around 5 got used, when a few got catched the next few jumped in etc.. So we needed much time to realize that they aren't only usual multiaccounters that aren't "connected". But the traces lead always to the same involved language (tree), the same involved, few, countries and so we catched them faster and easier and at some thing (that i don't reveal) he made a error and when we followed this we catched the complete farm.
He tried to minimize the damage with fixing his error but that 210 accounts got catched.
I have no doubts that he have now a new botfarm running, the only question is how big it is.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

At start, i remember that i typed manually thank you variations on all the giveaways i joined at that time.
It's probably 3000 of my 8000 messages. It took me a long time to understand that gifters didn't like it because they got a notification.
Really i thought they were happy to receive a message, that it was basic politeness, and i can imagine some new users think the same.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yeah, it's quite trivial for any "auto-joiner bot" to insert arbitrary pauses in-between actions.

it's ridiculous to think timestamps is some kind of smoking gun proof

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it's ridiculous to think timestamps is some kind of smoking gun proof

It's a good indicator and it give much more.
As example the entries over the years.

Look at my stats as very active user (i am ill, often at home, not so much away because of the chronical illness, don't sleep much etc.).
130k entries in 6 years

Now look at other ones stats, that enter a lot of GAs in a fast way, and you see users with much more entries as mine (up to the double!) and then tell me that all above 1.5x of me is human possible. Special when this guys do it since 10 years and such stuff. They could never made a break, never go out, could not have to work, can't have friends, only sleep very few hours each night (max. 3) etc. and all for such a long timeframe. Totally realistic...yes /sarcasm
And of course it gives more evidences as the entries alone but i don't reveal all our ways to catch the autojoiners.

But when the owner and only admin of the site come around to defend the autojoiners with examples how users could enter multiple GAs in the same second (for sure thousands will open multiple GAs and first then enter them and working with shortcuts to save the precious 10 seconds in the end... /+facepalm+), instead to activate his security stuff that he activated in the past (3 years ago?) for a short time and catched 3k+ autjoiners after warning them 2x before, then you know he don't want to do his admin job (if this wasn't clear before...).

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

🤔Kappa?

Ah, it's a matter of phrasing.
I'm not cheating on anything.😂

https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/qKQRdLh
The CG description itself was helpful.
 However, I feel that it diverges from the Guideline.
(Current Topics)
 Well, I felt that there is a possibility to make it so that can't open multiple pages, or that can only apply from SteamgiftsAPP.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

lol, i didn't ment you
think i'm hanging around on Twitch too much, where Kappa is an Emote to show irony
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/kappa

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I get why you are cautious but I'd really appreciate it if you gave us more than 1k slots for our blacklists. Besides Autojoiners there are many other reasons why that limit is insufficient. And I don't want to end up doing only Level 7+ giveaways because that allows me to sort out the bad apples within the bl limitations.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In that case what about implementing Google Recaptcha or any other anti-bot measure available?
Is it possible to limit giveaway enter rate? For example, scrap.tf have 3-5 seconds cooldown before you can enter other raffle.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

When an account enters multiple giveaways in the same split second

This would also apply to me and I use no bots at all.
Why?
I shift through all giveaways, open the ones I want to join in a new tab to read the giveaway text, let my script check if I already own them, then place the mouse cursor above the enter button, don't move the mouse, enter the first one, close the active tab with CTRL-W and just have to click the mouse button again to enter another giveaway.
I bet I can manage to enter three giveaways by this method, all within the same second, without using a bot and without making me a bot :)

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I used to do that a lot with ctrl-tab to scroll through the tabs. Enter from left to right, then read description on the last one (remove entry in case of U-7), crtl-W, then repeat. Nowadays I go with ESGST's grid view, oneclick entry with popup description because it works leagues better with a single page of giveaways.

Spread of their activity during the day could be a lot more telling, but even that can't be perfect. Back in the day I deliberately slept an hour shorter so I could maximize my famville farm's output with daily 3 harvests... it's inevitable some addict (or insomniac) is here every few hours to check for giveaways so this isn't perfect to begin with. False positives should always be considered when hunting for rulebreakers.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If you're really as fast as you're saying consider a career in e-sports :))

Like in every forensic work there has to be raised more than one flag to investigate further. It may take months for members to collect enough evidence to warrant a report to moderation which will result in a permanent suspension in an ideal scenario (or what's called "permanent" on SG).

For the site owner it's far less time consuming to monitor user behavior with server data available. That's why I was asking cg if he was prepared to do something about this well-known issue.

After all it's just about enforcing the rules he himself established.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As it wasn't obvious enough before it is very visible that he will avoid to work and protect the community.
And thats the reason why so many from the community, special the gifters part, are gone and why the behavior of the leftover users changed a lot to 3 years before and more to 6 years before.

The site is more and more for the users a "Keys dispenser" and thats it.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I tested it and have to retract that statement: At the most, if there are no browser hiccups, 2 GAs in one second. Three was not possible for me. Even for two everything had to be perfect, which was hardly the case.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This would also apply to me and I use no bots at all.

You are a tiny minority with the shortcuts and "speed run" tactic.
And if you would know it could bring you on a "false positive" list, you would , for sure, change it by spending 5 seconds more (or 50 or 500 seconds/day).

It give other evidences on top to identify the autojoiners.
And it give "unsuspend request" tickets for the false positive catched ones.
Nearly none ever handle the tickets but thats a other story....

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The autojoiners are 5k+.
The multiaccounters are a few hundred ones and harder to spot.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thanks for the reply. I guess with those numbers, it would be nice to punish the auto-joiners first then :D

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also it is possible there might be ethical multi-accounters who don't enter same giveaways. Though it's not so logical from a standard multi-accounter point of view. :P

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not ethical to have multiple accounts.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I just thought theoretically maybe they're not as bad as normal ones (if there is ever one like that), though I guess that's still some kind of abuse so I agree. By the way, would "moral" be a better choice of word or they're kinda same? In my mother tongue, we use them differently so might not interpret what I really mean.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In an infinite multiverse everything is possible even ethical robbers like Robin Hood.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Interesting point, I guess I'm too softhearted or haven't met one of those abusers.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I hunt such people since over 20 years..... and i NEVER met a multiaccounter that have moral or a ethical behavior.

They are greedy, egoistic people
The rest that i would use to describe them could be seen as insult, so i don't write it

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, I was being poilyanna. The world never works that way.

By the way, 20 years? You mean before SG? (I assume multi-accounters as a general behavior)

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

By the way, 20 years? You mean before SG? (I assume multi-accounters as a general behavior)

2x yes and you assume correct ;o)

Sg is only one place that they cheat to have advantages.
You see here, relative easy, that they cheat on (freebie) sites, twitch and discord servers to get more copies to sell/trade/give them on sg away which leads to money/games/better stats in groups to be able to win more/level up etc.

And mostly this people don't do one abusing thing, they do more as one.
So a lot of the autojoiner accounts are combined with multiaccounting on sg or on other sites to get games, sharing puzzle infos or the christmas gifts infos etc..

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

In my case I have a separate account for VR games only (necessary because of Steam's poor family sharing ability), so it would have been nice to be able to join using that account for entering only VR giveaways. But I understand this would make it difficult to police wins, and prevent multi-entries.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah my thought was something like this. But I agree, it would make things harder for mods since many would abuse that, just like region hoppers on Steam.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'll just leave here this link to a blog post that was written in 2009, but is as relevant today as it ever was:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/jeyvzALDbjdjjv5RW/pretending-to-be-wise

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just a bunch of totally personal opinions in my comment, but I've always found it fascinating how people love censorship that hits ideas they don't like but hate censorship that hits ideas they like.
Censorship, exactly (and ironically) like free speech, is a package. Either you have it or you don't. And when you have it, you're never really sure where it will hit.

As for the quote at the top of your link, about hell and being neutral, here's that well-known proverb about hell and being "good":
The road to hell is paved with good intentions

[Rushes back to normal tickets] 👀

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

fascinating how people love censorship that hits ideas they don't like but hate censorship that hits ideas they like

The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who in time of crisis remain neutral "disagree with my politics".

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who in time of crisis remain neutral.

Sounds like Zap Brannigan : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2WD1SJiRjo

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I would argue that this blogpost is a perfect example of pretending to be wise.

Bullshit statements like "On this point I’d advise remembering that neutrality is a definite judgment" is just "doing over thinking" mentality, arrogantly stating that "suspending judgement is pseudo-rational" - rational human beings can't be 'unsure' about stuff? Part of the post pertaining to passing neutral judgment could be rephrased as "Just pick a side bro, don't be a pussy smartass". Even if the author is actually an intelligent person (which I believe he is), this part is emotionally fueled and just dressed up as an academic discourse.

Part about limited resources makes much more sense, it's actually insightful and useful - and that's because it was, ironically, impartial academic work done by him and Hanson.

In sum - not the best piece from this author, especially when compared to his software engineering works or his other works on biases and rationality that aren't touching morality.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

New this would happen. As soon I saw "Content regarding sensitive subjects (e.g. politics, religion, sexuality) or sensitive events with significant social, cultural, or political impact" I knew it couldn't be maintained, because it would affect BLM and LGBQ threads. With so many BLM and LGBQ bundles and deals this would have never worked.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It was only ever "case by case". cg never said anything would actually happen, just that they could moderate.

People got into hissy-fits about hypothetical situations. I don't understand it.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think it makes sense to complain about hypotheticals that are actually mentioned in a new rule. Like if a rule said "under extreme circumstances, moderators can claim giveaway wins for themselves", people would be rightfully upset, even if it's not being put into use now and may never be used. The previous guidelines said "we are banning discussion of these 2 sensitive topics and we may do the same for other sensitive topics". People pointed out that there are tons of sensitive topics that they don't want to be censored, so CG changed the rule to clarify.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's really a bad "example" that would have undermined the whole reason for this site existing, and wasn't about the forums, which is what the proposed changes are about. Let's not get way off base, shall we?

"May" Let's not start shooting anyone.

...that we believe are facilitating a hostile and divisive environment throughout our community

...As for sensitive subjects or events, we'll look at those on a case-by-case basis to see how they're currently being handled by users in the community.

I'm not disagreeing that cg redefining the rules isn't a good thing, but I still think people were unnecessarily "scared" of the previous thread. Everyone was calling cg out, I even got the feeling that some people were stopping just short of calling him a nazi, they were being quite rude and critical of him. It was a huge shit-storm, and in a lot of cases, an over-reaction.


For me, the forums have always been a bonus to the site, NOT a necessity. I do understand that to some people the forums are the only reason to come to this site nowadays, with the decline in giveaways. With less and less giveaways, it's been the forum that's kinda kept things running.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Just checked, and the user that's started this shitstorm, yeah, that one who glorified Hamas, albeit carefully, has been finally suspended! His suspension will be over... in a day. That's some principles you've got. That's true neutrality, I guess - where you choose not to judge stuff like that kibbutz massacre.

Ukraine war thread was literally the place where people managed to notice I was suicidal and helped me. But, I guess, stuff like this is also excessive for a gaming forum.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He wasn't glorifying Hamas.
He stood for Palestine in his post.

Given that there was a Ukraine thread, it was fair for him to have one for Palestine too.
There's always two sides to a conflict.

We can't let one side share and express their grief and loss and not let the other.
Innocent people die on both ends, during war.

This is why I'm not opposed to not having those kinds of posts here, because it really is hard to moderate and keep clean.

War is ugly and bloody, and the loss of innocents lives on both sides is a tragedy.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Edit: whatever, I'm dead tired and done with arguing.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He wasn't glorifying Hamas.

I have to correct you here, he called one side terrorists and made this claim in almost every of his posts, but no one recognized Israel or the IDF as terrorists. On the other side he was only speaking of Hamas fighters, not terrorists of course, and other bull, like Hamas being a defence force
https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/37xBv48

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You don't even follow what you preach to others, do you?

View attached image.
6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

my intention wasn't to continue the discussion, but only to correct him, because this specific posts obviously slipped his attention

quite to the contrary what you tried, when i wrote this post to you, but as you don't quote directly anymore, your images of posts are quite out of context and a lazy denouncing attempt

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

only to correct him, because this specific posts obviously slipped his attention

do you hear yourself?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He's just lost and bored

https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/N8c8Jfo

There he goes again few comments below

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

he's clearly here just to fan the flames

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yes, the holy flames of enlightment and purge of propaganda and misinformation

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People like you are just ideologically poisoned wanting nothing but to troll and spread their low-effort toxic garbage under the guise of social justice warrior mentality.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

funny, the only thing i did was summarizing another users posts and suddenly it's MY "ideological poisoning" and MY "low-effort toxic garbage"
there's not even my own opinion involved in this

just another lazy denouncing attempt and how to call Israel and IDF terrorists by not saying it out loud
this says more about you than it does about me

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It would be amazing if the two of you would just get a room and play it out there

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh boy. you been going on about this for days iirc. Might aswell have put it at the end of this convo-chain but it might clear things up more easily here..
Congratulations, you´ve stepped into a trap! That twisting/switching of words, it´s a rhetorical technique, about as old as the Roman Senate, who probably 'borrowed' it from the Greek and g0d, or in that case the gods only know where they got it from.
It´s meant to give you a lay of the land, who gets riled up (seems you did), who doesn´t care, and who might start thinking the whole thing over (the ones I want to discuss it with further) or alternatively can be a plain distraction and while everyone´s outraged and arguing I take care of completely different things..
Is that still useful in the modern days of the internet, I find it debatable, then again you could just file it under irony/sarcasm. On the other hand getting overzealous and too personally involved over such matters is on the same page. Have to remind myself of that one time and time again..
take care!

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He actually was glorifying Hamas. He didn't care at all that Hamas's actions would lead to annihilation of the Palestinians people as long as a few thousand random Israelis were bombed or kidnapped, raped, and tortured.

And in point of fact, the entire 'occupation' could have been avoided in the first place if the soon to be known as Palestinian people had simply welcomed the Jewish refugees in the beginning rather than what they actually did. A lot of times, you are responsible for the creation of your greatest problems.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

hahaha he is openly anti semitic and glorified the attack of the hamas. fact...
he somewhere even said that he hates jews....
same as saying hating muslims, or christians or hindus.....

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really said ''I hate jews" i dont remember? stop lying i never said it PRO-ISRAELI TERRORIST SUPPORTER. Funny thing mods favouring people when i talk truth i get banned while other people abused me, insulted me and my family openly, threatened me with my personal info data called me troll/terrorist, are still out here. GOOD WORK MODS. In ten years i never saw this type biasness and double standard from mods like i saw in last 10 days. Its like a band of bullies controlling the site and mods are supporting them. There are lots of mod favourite people i reported i got all the evidence and the ticket is pending since a week. When i reply them i instantly get banned mod only activates on my comment. This will be my last comment so it doesnt matter they permanent ban me or not. After 11 years Bye bye SG.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really said ''I hate jews" i dont remember? stop lying i never said it PRO-ISRAELI TERRORIST SUPPORTER.

This is not the improvement as you think it is.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

He's probably referring to a punctuation issue, which could therefore be misread in this way.
From the replies it became clear what you meant.
Quote: "Stop assuming i dont hate jews"
Without punctuation, this is short for "Stop assuming that I don't hate jews."
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/0NKnq/new-content-guidelines/search?page=4#3cZRE7P

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

SG don't generally permaban people on the first offence (or else I'd no longer be here).
Admittedly the time it's taken to act on it is bewildering.
A suspension gives users time to chill out, reflect on their actions, and if they decide to come back, know that consequences will be more severe next time.

I know it's hard to see from one side, but when someone's not in the thick of the conflict, or it's not affecting them personally, and rules are being tread on by multiple parties (yes, he wasn't the only one) it can be hard to mete out unbiased judgment.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wanted to add, seems like the user who posted the thread with all the gore content that was uncensored, did not get suspended(or it already expired) although his thread was closed immediately for said content.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Moderation on this site has never been very even-handed.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

We also don't know if he's been suspended for his thread (seems like a little late for that), it could also just be for his gloating and trolling in cg's previous thread :x

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

View attached image.
6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I myself agree overall with this although this probably upsets people.

Would I like to discuss those topics like normal beings? Sure. Can we? Apparently not.
Would it be nice if we didn't have to share videos dead bodies on here? Sure. Can we? Apparently not.

Think of other places you wouldn't have these conversations and why they don't fit into sg as well. You wouldn't go to your wife's baby shower to discuss these things and yell at her friends for disagreeing with your view and call them slurs and pull up your tablet showing everyone dead beings? Would you do it in the middle of a walmart, at a bank, in the park, at your workplace, in a chat with chatgpt, at the comicon/blizzcon convention, in final fantasy xiv with your guild mates, on some popular youtube video that has nothing to do with or about it, on a computer parts forum, in fortnite, do you do it on steamtrades, fanatical, steamdiscussions/workshop/reviews/curators, epicgames, gog, at a restaurant, at school, at a concert, the club, or game night with friends and family, do you do it on the microsoft, amazon, sony, nintendo, whatever forums? Sure maybe by some rare chance you had some extremely small discussion in one of these places, but did it escalate to the point you share videos of bodies around with large groups of people? I'm betting on no or maybe I want to believe you don't show your mom videos of dead bodies.

So why is it mandatory for it to be here, and why can't it be in a dedicated place for such discussions like telegram, liveleak, and twitter, reddit and news reporting outlets, where they encourage these discussions? Sure we have an off topic section where anything off topic should be able to be discussed, but part of the reason it's not filled with porn or whatever is because people understand(I'm hoping) that this isn't the place for that stuff.

IMO, SG is a community for gamers, not a political website, and while I'm sure many of us are passionate of these subjects, they don't have much to do with sg with the exception that SG supports users from all across the world, hence bound to find people from conflicts/situations happening all across the world at any time, people of all kinds of religions, opinions, cultures, etc making it exponentially easier for said people to start disagreeing.. It's a lot easier for us to focus on negative things too than on positive things, so the more negative the event, the more it's bound to get us riled up.

I'm also glad CG and the other mods don't give their opinion on such topics (although I think some did before), as that would only make the opposite side feel unwelcome imo, and it's not like the mods or those users are out there responsible for either side. Mods in other places don't give their opinion either for the same reason probably. So imo people who ask for them to stop being neutral, are only trying to start a fire for nothing.

Lastly I'd rather the mod team focuses on other concerns the users have, like tickets and how to improve our community experience, events, new features, site stability, etc., rather than spend their time on threads that belong somewhere else.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1
i also dont understand how some ppl here think its either all or nothing. some discussions simply are escalating too much.
and just think about the mods having to look over all those things! they are also just human and having them see so many diturbing things will at some point break them unless they quitted being a mod before so or left SG completely .

and i also still think a new category for world news/events/catastrophes/etc would still be a good addition

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is what I also suggested at first, an "off topic 2 section" whose threads don't show up when you press the discussions button at the top but people interested in said topics can go there directly and learn about what's going on in the world, although I'm now thinking it might be better if there was someone on the mod team who reported on these things, and closed the thread immediately so it's not up for discussion because I feel if it's up for discussion people will post again the wrong content. I don't know what the best way to make that work would be.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This is how I feel as well. Even though this is a gaming specific website, I wouldn't mind to talk about any stuff that people affected by. It's our lives and if we want to talk to people, we should be able to. Freedom of speech is an important part of humans. However we should understand that constant pain makes people bitter and it's not their fault. Apparently it's hard for people to be unbiased and open-minded, so naturally any topic that includes any type of conflict might go ugly.

There is a proverb here "Her doğru her yerde söylenmez.", roughly translates as not every truth is told everywhere, if only people could do this. Awareness threads are not the root of this problem, it's the people who talk more than they should. Don't want to use the word "troll" here because I don't think they all do this intentionally. In the end, it appears to be this is hard without moderation. There are two options here in my opinion. 1) We need forum-only moderators, maybe attend them category by category (with better categorization of course). Even an AI that follows threads can be used to alert moderators. 2) Make the forum rules more strict (we are here).

So in this current situation, maybe this is for the best.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I just don't understand why they can't be a little more liberal with suspensions and bans if it's such a problem. Banning the entire topic only makes sense if it's like 75% of people are posting pictures of corpses and calling each other slurs. The reality is that those threads had a handful of crazy people that could have been dealt with and the average user could have had a normal discussion if they wanted to, or ignore the thread and go about their day

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1, you and satanclauss have (imo) the most levelheaded take about this.

Also moderator PTSD is no joke which the average user don't even think (or care) about. So I rather still have mods here who can do their job (better said volunteer job) properly instead of having none, because they all quit from stress due to having to moderate the disturbing shit these type of discussions tend to contain.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for listening and addressing concerns. Also, thank you for further explaining your reasoning.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Gamer site = GAMER Discussion about games and tech

View attached image.
6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

okay, i'm a bit of a troll here, but there is this game called
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1985510/Ukraine_War_Stories/
want to discuss about it?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you!

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

🤔 First, you should avoid "deleting comments".
 What was written? And was it deleted to make the argument unreadable? I feel that there is a possibility of spamming more of the same postings that have been discredited by the posters themselves and other users.
 And if you look at the state of affairs after the first announcement of this guideline thing, you will understand that this will be the reality.📝

 I think it would be a good idea, if the person is a human being, to suspend or permanently suspend the poster of a discussion where "comment deletion" is felt to be necessary, along with the comments in question and the reasons for them, to deter "Discussions trolls".
However,...
 A Mod/SUPPORT should not give discretionary authority to a discussion involving a country of affiliation.
 It is safer to limit yourself to expressing your opinions to other supporters.
 Supporters may threaten to give preferential treatment to their own countries, so it is less mentally taxing to specify in the guidelines that they have no such authority.
Some community users claimed that they were "sabotaged by the management's conspiracy to favor one side over the other. (summary)," some community users claimed, and it is better to avoid a buildup of mistrust.
It is better to eliminate the cause of the complication of the emotional problem even if there is no such fact.

 I also understand that you have included in this description what each supporter explained in their own capacity in the first discussion that the previous CG closed. ......


As noted, we will only be covering the two conflicts on the list at the moment. If another military conflict occurs in years to come, we'll first see how the community is capable of discussing it, and if other guidelines are able to keep the conversations civil and productive. If not, only then will we consider adding the conflict to the list. As topics on the list become less heated and when they are not developing on a daily basis, they will be revisited to see if they can be safely removed from the list.


 First, there will be an exchange of arguments between "perpetrator" and "victim" or "good" and "evil.😈👼🏴‍☠👶
What happens when it occurs?
To give you an example, a topic of concern about the recent situation in Ukraine has suddenly decided to switch to emergency content.
📝
As those who read the discussion know, it began with concerns about "immediate ceasefire" and "civilian casualties". (Initially)
 Later, we used it as a place to gather as much information as people in Ukraine and Russia could understand, as they could no longer pick up information on major sites due to the information blockade of Russian censorship and destruction of TV towers.
 Then there were sporadic spam postings and personal slander that stifled discussion as donations were made and fact-checks were put in place to determine which side was more serious in its lies.
(I believe that we have arrived at this recent situation by watching the sporadic postings of violence, grotesqueries, and non-fact-checking from some users from time to time, while watching the exchanges of users who are upset that those users are slow to pause or respond to their posts.)

To begin with, I had consulted the community about the discussion, concerned that something like this would happen as early as over a year ago.
For my part, there was a section that thought it was a story that had come to a conclusion.

https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/ZDgHgHX


[main points.]
posts from Ukraine and Russia never disappear.
(They are everywhere on Twitter, Facebook, You Tube, chat sections of leading distributors)
the disappearance of this discussion will create a debate over the debate.
avoidance by add-ons seems to be the best solution based on past discussions
it will last for about a year after the war is over
(omit)

July 2022


https://www.steamgifts.com/go/comment/DFHJtT0


But sadly, the SG mods seem to support it...

Why don't we add a topic category for topics related to war
This is due to past community discussion of "policy" and its consequences.
If you just want to separate the categories I think I can do it.
But like your opinion...
... since we would have to import personnel from all over the world to determine which are political statements It seemed physically impossible🙄.

A Tower of Babel would be needed.XD 🗼

This is the community with the 1st and 2nd largest number of Americans and Russians.
The fact that about 70% of the people there are expressing their opinions means that they do not want to restrict free speech.


Regarding your "spoiler" part.

One can see that several social media, including Twitter Inc. and even Microsoft, suffered from Russian BOTs and SPAM posts in the early days of the war.
I think it remains as an old argument.

One is that the criteria for SPAM and BOT in SG is a bit different from the former.

For example, it is acceptable to some extent to make political pursuits in a discussion.
(Moderators and supporters may caution against overzealous exchanges.)

 However, if you write in the comment section of a "present" after the other person's drawing period has ended, and you write about a topic that they are not allowed to discuss, do not expect a response.
 If the other person writes "do not post", you must end the conversation there or you will be treated as SPAM or suspected of being a BOT.
(Topics that the other person does not tolerate are not acceptable)

Usually, people who become friends within SG may exchange current topics.
(They may friend you on Steam as you get used to it).

In any case, leaving the discussion, when you enter a drawing for a game, you should express your appreciation when you receive the game, no matter what the nationality of the other party is.

You will be happier as a human being if you value the humanity of your friends who are always playing on your immediate side than if you go along with being exploited with the fraudulent tool of "money" for the convenience of some powerful people.

As usual, sometimes the "space translator" is not working well.
I was not speaking against you personally, but about something that everyone can think of.


July 2022

🙄

Well, I guess you all didn't remember or weren't interested in the fact that there was such a story.

The difference between then and now is that
The problem is that the burden on supporters is too great.🤔

I think it would be easier to create an emergency (war) category, which at the time did not need to go that far, and move what supporters felt was such content unconditionally to that category.

I feel it is appropriate for the residents of the gaming community to be able to avoid mentally shocking topics with a single subscribe/unsubscribe button.

Well, those who post war topics might want to look at the "UN" notices or write a guideline that they should "hope for a ceasefire that is not harmful to civilians" and also "act to stop violent acts" and avoid anything that incites "violence" or "hostility".

It seems that there are some AI-like human beings who are gentlemen, which is obvious, but there are also some AI-like human beings who say that they can do whatever they want if it is not written down.

This is a gentlemen's gaming community.

No situation should be tolerated where a playmate is in fear for his life.🤔<No?

Perhaps the CG and the supporter team have not yet taken the time to read all of the discussions outside of this discussion and some of the opinions in some of the support tickets.

 Hence, the "Summary of the middle of the process!" seems to have resumed as this discussion.
Some people may feel resentment, but I think there is an aspect that we have to wait for a week or so for a good answer on the part of CG and supporters, since this is an activity that the volunteer staff is doing when they can spare the time.

If I were in CG's position and short staffed, I would announce that I would post a summary within the management in a week. I would freeze this discussion for a week for that purpose and for scrutiny.
 If anyone raises a ruckus before the deadline, I will not adopt the opinions of non-gentlemen users.

In any case, there is no doubt that this has been a huge burden and disruption for both residents and community operations.
Everyone gets a break, and we want to hear what you have to say.🍵🍘☕🧁

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I still think it would be better to provide tools for users to hide discussions they do not want to deal with.

That said, I can understand the reasoning behind the decision -- the explanation about the toll on moderators is very reasonable. Not too happy about what happened, but no line of action would be free of unfortunate consequences.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Seems like a really roundabout solution to the problem when the mods could simply ban people who resort to personal attacks and let everyone discuss what they want if they do it in a civil fashion :x

konradsnever4get

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Agreed, it's not like there are hundreds of people posting uncensored war pictures and videos, it's a handful of people that can be temporarily suspended and then banned if they continue.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This. Most of us are civil, even when things aren't 100% agreed upon. It sucks that a handful of trolls made things worse for those of us who aren't assholes.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not to protect anyone - there are people on the other side of both conflicts who are ready to immediately sling shit back at the trolls at the same vehemency, that you think you see two groups of baboons fighting.
It's about a dozen people who can't let go, and start picking on the other side now in the... 4th or 5th topic?

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This does seem a lot more focused and a lot less subjective

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It sucks that trolls managed to derail personal and important conversations, to the point where such topics were outright prohibited. I wish we could have kept things going and just have the dipshits banned. Though I do understand the toll it takes on our mods, and respect what they do for us. I get trying to lessen the burden for them.

And yes, I know this is a gaming forum, but much of the community has decided that the off topic forum is for everything off topic including politics. To me, this community is at its best when we come together and discuss diverse topics in a civil manner, including controversial things. I enjoy a good debate.

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't really do debates, especially not in a foreign language as any kind of social interaction can be quite challenging for me, but I enjoy a lot reading when others present their points of view and even succeed in explaining why that is their point of view. It's very educating - not just about world but about people in general.

What I don't enjoy at all are those whose sole purpose seem to be trolling, causing fights, they are the same people who made my childhood a living hell. I call them "ambassadors of malicious" though I'm not sure that's a good translation.

What I also don't enjoy is when those people succeed in destroying the discussion with their trolling and then go practically unpunished. Being suspended for a day or two for this magnitude of disturbance is not a punishment, it's an encouragement to continue and find next thread to desecrate. In this matter I feel the moderators have failed the community and that makes me very disappointed. Vast majority of people in this forum have behaved very civilized even when discussing very difficult topics and now I feel those people are the ones being punished instead of the trolls.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Vast majority of people in this forum have behaved very civilized even when discussing very difficult topics and now I feel those people are the ones being punished instead of the trolls.

Most of the time the topic was informative and provided support to the affected, but once the trolls came (who were suggested to create their own thread) with the intention just to spread hatred and derail the topic they were banned for 1-2 days. Then it was cleared a little, then they came back and basically achieved what they set in the first place enabling their behavior. Now they have a exact guideline on how to close a thread and make the topic of the discussion banned.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As someone who was very vocal against the "old" revised rules, I am much happier with the new revised rules. Thank you. To be prepared for the future, in your mind you can already add the "China-Taiwan" war to the list, as I sadly think this will be happening in a few years.

I am also happy to see that you openly express realizing you made a mistake. This is a good sign. It is also helpful that you gave us a little bit of a "behind the scenes" look regarding talks with and feedback by your support team members.

On the other hand, I am still sad that there is the need to forbid certain topics within the forums, as I am a person who strongly feels that speech should never be suppressed. But I understand your needs to do this and will accept those.

I must stress that the new revised guidelines are no help at all without all of you applying a faster and stricter approach regarding permanent suspensions or even bans. I am sure you know that the content will find it's way into other threads not specifically created for the two banned subjects, as it already has in the thread for the "old" revised guidelines. You have to ban those bad community members fast and efficient, to set a clear line.

Having said (wrote) all that, thank you for listening to feedback and for establishing the new revised guidelines, CG.
Now, there is the Autojoiner-/Bot-Problem to tackle. You can do this ;)

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

While I somewhat share your concerns, I just wanted to add a few snippets to hopefully ease your sadness.
For one, there´s a time and a place, and maybe, just maybe, SG isn´t for such things.. well per the new revised guidelines it actually isn´t.
The other thing is that I believe there is no freedom without regulations - unless we´re talking about an anarchic idea of freedom, and honestly, it´s a fun idea I can´t see working IRL. While it has been redefined, we haven´t 'lost' any freedom from that pov imo.
Ofc I acknowledge the individual losses to express themselves and their feelings, tho I don´t really see such matters affected by the guidelines - they clearly target the political aspect.
Anyway, as a greater mind than mine already put it 'The needs of the many...' & in the end we all want to have SG up and running as smooth as,I guess.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

there is no freedom without regulations

100% true.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I sympathize with people who are indirectly and directly affected by war.

I empathize with people who come to online forums like this because they seek or like this online community, whether they have much of one IRL or not (for me, my online communities feel more consistent than my IRL ones, and this is the one I check the most), and thus are more inclined to share thoughts & feelings about what is going on IRL. People can say that this is just a game-related website, but that doesn't change the sociological dynamics inherent with online discussion forums that exist here, and if you don't like it then feel free to not go to the forums as much or not at all. But if you choose to stay on the forums, then chances are the whole "this is an online community I like" is keeping you active in the forums and wanting to "fight" for what you think is a better forum.

I also empathize with moderators as I've been one on two bigger parts of reddit.

I wish there was an easier solution, but I otherwise respect these updated guidelines, knowing that solutions not involving banning specific war topics would likely require more moderators or more forum moderation tools.

I think a buried comment otherwise resonates with me:

There is a proverb here "Her doğru her yerde söylenmez.", roughly translates as not every truth is told everywhere, if only people could do this. Awareness threads are not the root of this problem, it's the people who talk more than they should. Don't want to use the word "troll" here because I don't think they all do this intentionally. In the end, it appears to be this is hard without moderation. There are two options here in my opinion. 1) We need forum-only moderators, maybe attend them category by category (with better categorization of course). Even an AI that follows threads can be used to alert moderators. 2) Make the forum rules more strict (we are here).

EDIT: Clarified thoughts on online communities

6 months ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I just now noticed this thread, and must say that this seems a lot more reasonable than the previous version of these new rules, at least to me. Guess I'm pretty much satisfied with how this is being handled now, don't really have any further criticism or objections to raise.
Thanks for the changes and adjustments, and specially for listening to our concerns, I really appreciate that.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

📝
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/XQsdC/hide-discussions
The new feature was implemented 4 hours ago.
It is better to understand the existence of this feature before discussing it from here on.

→↑👁

🔭Big Brother is you, watching🙂

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good. There are better platforms to bring such discussions to. We just want to talk games here.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for the clarification! While I still think that it's sad that it came to this, I also understand that mods don't want to review certain links or graphics. I don't even know why some people feel the urge to look at them or bring them up.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The reason for that would likely be disgust at world affairs and how they are being portrayed.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not sure if we have a misunderstanding here, maybe caused by my not clear wording. My last sentence was solely aimed at pictures or videos of war/terror victims. I also read about subreddits with footage of accidents or shootings before.
I don't get which purpose that should serve. Voyeurism? At least they are not bystanders and blocking rescue workers, but it's still disrespectful towards the victims. Should rather watch action/disaster/gore movies then. Truth? Since we rely much on our eyes, it might seem like that at first, but pictures and videos have been abused for manipulation for a while now, be it just by angle, by context or actually by software.
After the recent happenings I saw many postings by people who were either shocked by what they had seen or reacted in a hateful manner because of it. Led me to the question: why do you look at it if you can't handle it? Not saying I could, but I also don't look it up.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because individual pictures or videos of the violence shocks and disgusts them less than the concept of the overarching violence that isn't being addressed. People gravitate towards the offending subject because they see injustice, and want to express that outrage. In doing so, they see samples of it, and when they feel others are not aware of (or are in denial of) the injustice, they use those samples to try spread awareness and call for support.

Yeah, the effect any individual will have on such subject would be small to none, so sacrificing our own mental / emotional wellbeing seems like an unwise move, but despite the common evils that repeat through human nature, so too do we have common virtues, a desire to confont injustice, to defend those who are hurt undeservingly, etc. So passion often wins out over wisdom, which is the root of many awful and many great things. The online world isn't much different in that regard, except that it is much easier and faster to get locked into echo chambers and be subject to streams of weird info bubbles due to how algorithms can work.

It is often phrased like "Being unable to look away from a trainwreck", seeing something awful unfold that you don't need to be witness to, but are drawn towards observing it due to our threat-management instincts. Only in this case, the threat is not towards us.

And yes, in any war, misinformation is common. Wartime propaganda is sadly both a weapon and a shield, along with a way to influence opinion and morale. Yet even through misinformation or likely skewed snippets, we can often glimpse pieces of the truth. The best way to catch a liar has always been to gently pick at the loose ends and the parts of their story that do not add up, and the liar will often unravel themselves. Sometimes the propaganda serves as an accidental self-destructive broadcast of things they didn't mean to show.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for elaborating!

I'm absolutely fine with empathy, even outrage or confronting the injustice. If it turns into hate, often combined with generalisations, I wished the media would act more responsible. It only adds to the already for years ongoing increase of polarisation in political debates.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 6 months ago.

6 months ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't have necro intentions, 🤔
Due to the international situation, there may be more posts related to the guidelines, so we will raise the existence of the guidelines.

Please remember that this Guideline exists.

3 weeks ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.