I do like reviews that are concise, it doesn't get much more concise than some bulletpoints ><
Have a bump :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks! Have a Christmas cat :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks! And I don't think I said it yet it your thread, but congrats on 2000 followers in your group, quite the milestone :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Efficient reviews, even if I can disagree with the verdict (recommended or not) I agree with most key point from what I've read--> I subscribed
What do you all think of curators with a lot of negative reviews?
Hmm.. Make reviews for game where your opinion differs from majority then. When everyone thinks it's a good game and you think it's a bad game.. But I suppose you deleted games where most think it's a bad game so there is no point making review.
Comment has been collapsed.
Thanks! And yea I've deleted a ton of games from my library that I didn't like, but a number of them were actually well rated and I figured it might be worth giving an opposing view. Just un-deleted 'The Next Penelope' for instance (Mostly Positive ratings) and gave it another shot before making a review.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nice.
As the above poster said, making negative reviews for highly negative games is kinda pointless - as is making positive reviews with a ton of good reviews already, in my opinion - unique, hidden gems, or writing reviews that perhaps go against the norm?
Comment has been collapsed.
Followed...
I think bulleted reviews are a good idea since they can provide an overview of pros and cons... thx for the chance and GL with the curator group
Comment has been collapsed.
Just my opinion, but I think negative reviews are good when they're necessary, like when the game is so broken and chunky that you can't complete it or when it's unfinished etc.
I frequently see myself reading the negative reviews more than the positive ones when I'm gonna buy something, and it's better if they're clear and concise in bullet form. However when I see curators just giving negative reviews because a game is popular (¨"overrated") I feel like that's more of a personal opinion rather than analyzing each aspect of the game, the good and the bad. So yeah, from my side I don't mind negative reviews as long as they're fair.
Comment has been collapsed.
Giveaway ends in an hour, so here's one last bump.
Comment has been collapsed.
Hey man, idk why you stopped but If you still enjoy gaming and reviewing..
I hope you persevere and can get back at it :)
(also I respect the fact that u spent 50+ hrs on Hollow Knight just to review it haha)
Am willing to take a chance on you, Joined!!
Comment has been collapsed.
So a few days ago I made a curator group as a way to encourage myself to play more games. Reviews focus on listing key good/bad points about the game which may help players decide if it's something they'd enjoy. Figured I'd post it to SG in case anyone here likes this sort of thing.
Also wanted to ask; What do you all think of curators with a lot of negative reviews? Right now I'm mainly focused on games I liked, but I have deleted a ton of games from my Steam library that I didn't enjoy and could easily make reviews for most of them.
Indie Bullet Point Reviews
And as is tradition, here's a giveaway as thanks for checking out the thread. :)
Comment has been collapsed.