I avoid the season pass/DLC problem by waiting two or three years and then buying the gold edition with all the DLC's included for less than the original price of the season pass.
I agree, however, that it's all about trying to squeeze money out of the consumer. Shouldn't the proper response be to withhold your money?
Comment has been collapsed.
Here's how it goes. Games devs, as companies, are not saints. This means their public face is that of your best friend, so you keep buying. Behind closed doors, they do nothing but despise you and only want to maximise the amount of content they can take from your wallet while minimising cost to themselves. Note: I am discussing the businesses here, not the individuals. Note also: I mentioned how they have to show the public face as that of your best friend...Not EA - they just moon you with an unwiped backside, and idiots still buy from them...
On to my second point. I have been listening to, and joining in these debates about DLC/expansions/microtransactions etc. for a long time and the arguments generally go thus;
"When I pay what is, to many people, a lot of money for a game, I expect it to be complete and finished. This is not an unreasonable request. I'm sick and tired of all this DLC crap!"
"I enjoy immersing myself in game worlds and have reasonable means to pay to do so, but still expect value for money. I don't mind it as long as it's well done, like Fallout 3 or Borderlands (the original, not 2 - evidently)"
"Either I, or more likely my parents, have more money than sense. I love DLC. I get all the COD map packs when they come out and once spent $4000 on Farmville and made it into the local newspaper for being stupid."
"I've completely missed the point that in order for this to have been further developed as a business model it has to have been profitable, and if all these people don't like it, then who is paying for it!? I forgot the fact that marketing and product appeal are designed to create an artificial need in those with more money than sense and therefore think that if we ignore the problem it will go away. Pfft...Don't like it, don't buy it."
Me, I've tried having these arguments before and it seems for some people supporting developers/franchises by buying DLC is like some religious experience. That if we don't buy their shit, they won't sell us their gold. But I don't want shit, and I don't need gold. There are plenty of fine games out there, old and new, that I haven't played. In time those money-grubbing bastards who stripped others of their cash full price for this stuff, then shovel out a complete edition that you can buy preowned from some independent retailer for a quarter what other people paid in total.
Oh what's that!? Games industry trying to discourage second-hand games trading by including 'online passes'? Some men just want to watch the world burn
tl;dr - Play other games instead and keep complaining/not buying in the hope people listen.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes there should be, they were called expansions and they were awesome, I feel old having to say this even...
Now we have DLC, 95% of it is not awesome AT ALL.
Comment has been collapsed.
I remember being excited when they were releasing, like when the Neverwinter Nights expansions came out I was pretty damn happy. I never got that feeling with DLC sadly...
Comment has been collapsed.
Well first of all I'll never trust a thing Randy Pitchford or Gearbox ever say but that has nothing to do with this discussion. And yes lie was probably the wrong word to use because in my opinion Season Pass + the base game should equal the complete version. Hence why I said Rockstar seem to be one of the only companies still doing it right.
Comment has been collapsed.
You've got to be shitting me........
My god how hard is it to stick to longer wait times and release a well published and content relevant expansion? Hell i don't give a shit if the average 15yr old attention spam is 3hrs for a Black Ops campaign, that doesn't mean you have to accomodate for that audience...
I know economy is fucked up no matter where we live but that does not justify milking the credit card of that 14yr old kid's father, has the demographic for the recent games changed that much? or are we just that stupid in general?
Comment has been collapsed.
No they aren't. Paying developers money for content is how entertainment media works. Even with massive amounts of DLC, games will be your best and cheapest entertainment dollars. What they do is let you have variable investment in a game. If I buy a game and don't like it, it stops there, if I love it, I can get more of it.
Comment has been collapsed.
Except its not a scam? Its your choice at the end of the day.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeh that's prime example for major customer fuckery.
I was about to buy BL2 season pass, i'm glad i didn't.
Same with the so called "pre-order bonus".
Like OMG if i don't pre-order it now i will miss the game content forever. Take all my monies.
Half year later.... *zing*
a new DLC pops up (with the very same content as pre-order bonus).
What the actual fuck...
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeh you get it "for free".
Pre-order the game and get this xyz content "for free". EXCLUSIVE OFFER!
For the slowpokes: the pre-order content is a initial part of the product and is later being sold seperately just to make more money off of those who didn't pre-order it for full price, ergo the cost for base game + this particular DLC = same full price as on release day.
Feels like arguing with an average 15y/o Call of Duty consumer.
Comment has been collapsed.
I beg to differ. Usually the equation goes:
Cost of game 1 month later + cost of DLC on sale = 1/2 the cost of the original preorder game
I bought Quantum Conundrum preorder simply because I love Portal game mechanics and it came with some nifty TF2 stuff. Bad move. Haven't played past the 2nd level because I got fed up with the level design.
EDIT: I forgot to mention that the game was later featured in SquareEnix's multigame Amazon bundle where several SE games (including QC) went for less than the cost of my preorder.
Comment has been collapsed.
So, preorder costs 60$, right? You get the game itself and pre-order bonuses. Release day - same 60$, but no bonuses. Kinda makes that pre-order content free for pre-order customers, doesn't it?
And I've never argued that this pre-order content will pop up later on, I've never said anything about it's exclusivity, just that it's free for pre-order customers.
Comment has been collapsed.
I remember how back in the day games used to come out with updates after release. I think we called them "expansion packs."
I really fail to see how buying the season pass for BL2 is throwing money down the toilet compared to something like the expansions to Age of Empires. It still clocks in at about 50% of the original MSRP of the base game - the only difference is that you get the parts/chapters of the expansion as they are completed rather than waiting for everything to be done
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes very good. And now Gearbox has to make season pass content for Colonial Marines, content that very few people will ever see since the game was a disaster. Wouldn't their time be better spent making other content? The good thing about expansion packs was that they couldn't be preordered before the game is out and were only made if the game was actually doing well - market wise.
Comment has been collapsed.
The person who bought it in the first place is even more stupid IMO.
Comment has been collapsed.
Like mentioned before.
It doesn't matter, most people will just trow their money away for every little thing they can get on a game. We have the power to change the industry, yes, by not going and buying super extra marketed games, and the same thing goes with preorders.
Example: Aliens Colonial Marines.
That game was a piece of shit, but everyone ran to pre order it because the demo was cool, and it was just that, a piece of market propaganda that looked nice to get people to buy the game.
Take another example on the recent fiasco of Sim City, some people on the internet never stopped talking about the Always Online DRM, but hundreds of sheeps when and preorder it anyway, now is on it's way to be the worst rated product ever on Amazon.com.
The point is, if we think stuff like this is BS we should not buy it, but don't get our hopes up, because some other idiots are going to buy it blindly.
Comment has been collapsed.
Welcome to capitalism. Get used to it because it's not going anywhere any time soon. If you don't like it, don't buy it. If enough people abstain from buying, they will be forced to alter their methods if they want to continue making money. If people continue to buy it, they won't. That's the beauty of a free market. The consumer has the final say. Apparently most consumers are okay with it, seeing as developers continue to employ these DLC practices.
Comment has been collapsed.
From the Borderlands 2 Season Pass store page:
Can’t get enough Borderlands 2? Grab the Borderlands 2 Season Pass and get access to four downloadable content packs for Borderlands 2 at one discounted price:
So it seems to me that this product was never advertised as including all the DLC. It was a package for the four significant gameplay DLCs (mini-expansions). Thus far everything they have released outside of that (not counting the Creature Dome and Mechromancer, both of which were included at no cost for preorders) has been purely cosmetic and was never advertised as being in this. I could understand being upset if they exclude something that actually affects gameplay, and at that point I will happily join you in complaining. Until then I am more than happy to let people who want cosmetic stuff pay for that and let the company get more profit to put back into the franchise.
Comment has been collapsed.
While I agree that people apparently no longer read what they are buying...
I'm not sure I understand the logic behind "if addon content is more significant than cosmetics, it should be free". I understand wanting stuff cheaper, or free... but if the Season Pass doesn't advertise anything outside of those four significant addon packs... why exactly are you entitled to it? Because it includes new maps and should've been in there from the beginning? Is that EVER how expansion packs (back in the day) or DLC worked?
Day 1, on the disc DLC... I understand being annoyed with. This not so much.
Comment has been collapsed.
I didn't necessarily mean that all non-cosmetic content should be free. However if they introduced, say a new endgame boss, between the DLCs that is something that would traditionally come as part of the four packs. IT would also likely have required a larger portion of the team (not just mainly the art department) that should be busy producing the game content they have already let you pay for. Once they have fulfilled their obligation for that they can do whatever they want (though they should want to do BL3 ;))
Comment has been collapsed.
159 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Kabirbd
2 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by RiPPn
120 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by spookypannkaka
22 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by theemu
4 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by FeedMeAStrayCat
1,352 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Formidolosus
156 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
83 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by pawelt
112 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by raydotn
78 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Sarathius
4,346 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by Midnight12891
8,928 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by sesito71
39 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ezeekyule
10,348 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CurryKingWurst
As if season pass weren't bad enough trying to suck more money out of us, it seems the new trend is to make DLC and not even put it in the season pass.
Games that come to my mind this moment.
-Borderlands 2
-Darksiders 2
And now recently Black OPs 2(They added Micro transactions.)
Why must publishers keep doing this...
I wonder what the next bullshit next scam will be...
Comment has been collapsed.