Part 1
I found a small proof on the internet that is relavent to what I am working on at the moment but I am having a hard time understanding it. I would be very grateful if someone could take the time to elaborate on it and maybe explain it a bit more in depth.

P.S.. might drop some random CD keys here sometime today so keep an eye out ;P

SOLVED--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 2

  1. Show that 6-i is a Gaussian prime using the formula Norm(ab)=norm(a)norm(b).

  2. Show that if m+ni divides ordinary number k, then m-ni divides k as well.

  3. Deduce from question 2 that any ordinary prime which is not of the form n2+m2 is a Gaussian prime.

  4. Show that a positive ordinary integer of the form 4k+3 is not of the form m2+n2, and hence that ordinary primes of the form 4k+3 are Gaussian primes.

Got this last bunch to solve and will drop some keys within the next hour or so

[Edit] need to check which of the cd keys are not activated so might take some time

View attached image.
8 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

bump

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Hmmm, challenge accepted! (I suck at explaining things :P)
In Z/4Z there are only 4 elements {0,1,2,3}. (Is "elements" the proper english term?)
0^2=0
1^2=1
2^2=4=0 (mod 4)
3^2=9=1 (mod 4).
So a^2+b^2 has to be either 0+0=0 or 0+1=1 or 1+1=2, it can't be 3. Thus, if n=a^2+b^2 it can't be =3 (mod 4).
Is this making any sense? XD

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfortunately I do not quiet know what Z/4Z is and how to apply the modulo function to it (I just learnt what the f it was through google). But thanks heaps for taking your time to explain.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

the operator you are using indicates that you are dealing with all integers with the operation "mod 4" applied to them. thus only the 4 elements can exist {0, 1, 2, 3}

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Definition: The symbol Z means "The integers"
Definition: not sure if this helps but you are dealing with mod 4. the operator "mod" means you take the remainder of what it is after you divide. So 3^2 mod 4 = 9 mod 4 = 1, because 9/4 = 2 remainder of 1.

The nature of this problem deals with integers and mod 4. When the problem says "if n (operator) 3", this means that what you should assume is "suppose n mod 4 = 3".

So that's what you do. You suppose the "if" part.

Suppose n is an integer, and n mod 4 = 3.

You know that n can only be one of the following: 0, 1, 2, and 3. This is because when you take any integer and divide it by 4, the only possible remainders can be 0, 1, 2, or 3.

Then you suppose, for contradiction, that n = a^2 + b^2, where a and b are integers.

[Essentially through this contradiction you are going to prove that the sum of two squares when divided by 4 will never have a remainder of 3]

Well let's consider the squares in Z/4Z. As I said the only possible numbers you can have are 0, 1, 2, and 3.

0^2 mod 4 = 0. Okay. Next one
1^2 mod 4= 1. Cool.
2^2 mod 4 = 4 mod 4 = 0. therefore 2^2 = 0.
3^2 mod 4 = 9 mod 4 = 1. therefore 3^2 = 1.

So you have just proven that the only possible digits that can exist as a square in Z/4Z are 0 and 1. Therefore the binary sum of 0 and 1 can never result in 3. In fact, the highest possible value you can get is 1 + 1 = 2. It can never be 3.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

and the proof therein lies that you have contradicted your assumption that n = a^2 + b^2. you just showed that it's actually impossible. Therefore the assumption was wrong.

Therefore n =/= a^2 + b^2

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you so much! I think I sorta get it now! I will try this out on paper as well.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ok. message me if u still confused

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow Magma Claw, I didn't think you'd get any replies here on SG but it seems there are some smarties here after all! :D

Now we won't have to post all over reddit for you.

Congratulatory bump!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm going to sleep now, so I guess I'll be missing out on those free keys :P

good luck with what you're working on! :D sadly I can't be of much help :(

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Without reading the proof, it took me exactly 0.1 seconds to realize that 3 cannot be the sum of two squares.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

that's not the question.
the proof says: if n is in the form of 4m+3 than it is not the sum of two squars.

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I figured it out, basically, if it is the sum of 2 squares then a and be must be respectively odd, even or odd and odd or even and even (p = a^2+ b^2) but when you solve each of them you get 4k + 1 and 4 +2 and some other thing

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

yeah that proof is not hard to understand.
but not sure about the complex part in the other questions. sorry :(

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ah no problem, thanks anyways!

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Show that 6-1 is a Gaussian prime using the formula given in question 2.
Show that if m+ni divides ordinary number k, then m-ni divides k as well.

What is 6-1? What formula was given in question 2? What are m,n,i?

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

meant to be 6-i damit.. sorry, EDIT: root of negative 1 is i

8 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

fixed

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Uhm, I'm half asleep and not sure what definitions you were given and what you already know, so I'll just drop some ideas:

  1. If we suppose 6-i=(a+bi)(c+di) => Norm(6-i)=6^2+(-1)^2=37.=norm(a+bi)(norm(c+di). 37 however is prime. That would imply that either norm(a+bi) or norm(c+di) is 1. So either a^2+b^2=1 or c^2+d^2=1. That means that one of those complex numbers should belong to the set {i,-i,1, -1}.
  2. I guess you can use the fact that conjugate is distributive over multiplication? Although I suppose the solution should have something to do with gaussian primes.
  3. If x is prime, take (a+bi) such that (a+bi)(c+di)=x => (a-bi)(c-di)=x (from question 2) => (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=x^2. Since x is prime either a^2+b^2=1 or c^2+d^2=1 and thus x is a Gaussian prime or a^2+b^2=x (which is against the hypothesys).
  4. If n=4k+3 then n=3 (mod 4) and thus (by the proposition in the picture) can't be of the form m^2+n^2.

My english sucks, my brain is asleep and I'm too lazy and tired to google most of those things, so take all of this with the notion I might be talking complete nonsense (happens to me quite often XD). I shouldn't be doing your math homework anyway :P

8 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.