Day One: Garry's Incident devs pull out TB's negative video due to copyright infringement

It isn't a stupid logic at all. A clever person is not a person who has a lot of knowledge. I have seen people becoming lawyers, but being really stupid. Stupidity is when you take the side of the rich because they offer you wealth. In the end, you will become their slaves too. So in general, even a farmer can be clever, even a person who has never been to school can be clever. For being clever is the ability to understand what's right, what's wrong, and what must be fought till death. For instance, the devs are indeed educated, but not clever. If they were clever, they would make an update/post regarding that video, in which post they would say about how sorry they are for their game being bad, or just unplayable. As this means they are in a debt for people who vote, or even bought it, they will do a harder job and they will work on a huge update which will fix a lot of problems, bugs, glitches, and make the game playable. They could also say that this update would fix many problems, but not all of them, but they will update the game once in a while, throwing out more bugs, and throwing in more awesome stuff. They could also offer a free DLC which some extra content (after they fix serious problems) to the people who already bought the game... That way they would be positive judged, just because they care.

You do realize that someone can be smart at one thing and stupid at another right? The dev could be considered intelligent for having the capacity to make a game and he could be considered an idiot because he took these actions. I realize thinking can be hard sometimes but it really is fun once you get used to it.

True, but people talking our their asses on things they know nothing about is something I have experience of. Unlike, say, armchair lawyers claiming that YouTube have broken the law "BECAUSE FAIR USE".

Why? If you get a game that sucks and your job is first impressions, why would you continue playing? Go to something actually enjoyable. You did your job.

The very job of a critic is to tell you their opinion of a game. If a game comes out that isn't good, then their job is to tell you that. There are certain features of games that you can expect from all of them. Some of the major complaints TB has about games is their lack of a good options menu and FPS's without FOV sliders.
Critics should tell you if a game doesn't live up to what is considered standard. You can't just say, "Oh, the devs wanted to make a shitty game, they succeeded, 10/10." You have to judge a game based on a set of standards. If the game doesn't meet them, then it is considered a poor game because of it.
TB Makes videos of something like 5 games a week. He doesn't have time to spend 10-20 hours one ach game, and then make his video, 5 days a week. He has time to play 1-5 hours of a game, spend maybe 3-10 hours making the video, and then upload it.