I remember hearing about one that allowed you to click to enter from the main list like you can with IG which would help save on bandwidth since you wouldn't have to load a page every time.
From what I understand extension loads page in background, there is no link like www.steamgifts.com/giveaway/skyrim-Vi/enter that could be generated by script. So you "load" said page without knowing it and script just shows the shortcut link to what it loaded in background. Someone correct me if wrong, but IMO you would not save anything by using enter from main page.
Comment has been collapsed.
Script still needs to load up all those pages in background to generate the link between "giveaway" and "enter button". So while it does not load images themselves, it does cause web browse to open more pages in background than it normally would.
Unless it creates "place holder" button that only loads giveaway page in background when you interact with it. But seeing cg had to curb number of requests that people can send per second, as people were making scripts that were broken in how they worked - don't think they think that much about limiting number of requests they make to minimum. But I may be wrong. Won't go now and try to understand javascript they use to write extensions.
Comment has been collapsed.
What makes "enter" button work is not HTML but javascript.
And it's simple to check, as disabling javascript makes "enter" button unusable. It is there, but it's not possible to click it to enter. So scripts do not parse HTML only, they must load whole javascript.
Comment has been collapsed.
Unfortunately, you're not quite correct. To enter a giveaway the script doesn't need anything beyond html, because the script itself can implement any required logic without the original scripts. It just replicate the original behavior in a desired way. That's one of the reasons why third-party scripts can break if an original implementation changes.
Comment has been collapsed.
Is there a way to test to make sure it can only change the HTML for interacting with just this domain and not access input on other sites? Wouldn't want it stealing passwords.
Not sure about other extensions and browsers but ESGST in Firefox requires to enable permissions explicitly for every site it can use.
Also you can try other extensions (like NoScript or uMatrix) which limit access to third-party sites.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, but the more important question is whether they're sponge-worthy
Comment has been collapsed.
213 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by BarbaricGenie
494 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by EntitledGamer
1,734 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by star4you
37 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by IGotWhatYouNeed
374 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Jendy
2,963 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sfkng
16 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Dandey
1,177 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by lionheart987
118 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by PapaSmok
70 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by HerrBu
146 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by AmanoTC
10,276 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CurryKingWurst
1,026 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by LegendaryEagleKnight
17,842 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by GeekDoesStuff
I remember hearing about one that allowed you to click to enter from the main list like you can with IG which would help save on bandwidth since you wouldn't have to load a page every time. Just not sure about giving access to browsing to random extensions. Is there a way to test to make sure it can only change the HTML for interacting with just this domain and not access input on other sites? Wouldn't want it stealing passwords.
Comment has been collapsed.