What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?

In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?

7 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:

"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you. That's good to know.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)

So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Correct. Until the site has some public way of marking a suspension for a given offense as "already served", every single rulebreaker should be reported on every single giveaway they win for their entire time on the site. Just in case.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

its probably because they don't want the requests to pile up

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's because if you could never win a game again, they'd just ban you outright for the first offense. The one month rule is so that the first punishment isn't permanent.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.