Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
289 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by KalytaV
14 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by RevCat
273 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Reidor
3 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by lostsoul67
18 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by ShannonA81
6 Comments - Last post 10 hours ago by D34Done
13 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by reigifts
51 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by insideAfireball
231 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Tsukurai
96 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by izzasou
1 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by insideAfireball
136 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by NymCast
106 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by RePlayBe
5 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by SirSage
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.