Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
36 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by CedarTeeth
23 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by thekenya
562 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by sfkng
27 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
42 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by PTTsX
99 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by drschnell
29 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by AxJ
242 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by Lironezzz
70 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by Lironezzz
48 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SlingShotBE
295 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MyrXIII
74 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Grogglz
30,594 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by marilynhanson
151 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by BarbaricGenie
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.