Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
2 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Chris76de
366 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Birdie0
36 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
8,474 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by FranckCastle
15,404 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by vlbastos
64 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by romana1994
19 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Seibitsu
42 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Swordoffury
63 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Agrass
34 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by JMM72
543 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Painandpleasure
15,143 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by gonsi
101 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by xxxka
93 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Si9a
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.