Let me quote one of my previous reroll ticket responses here:
"The 1 month clause only applies when the winner has already served their suspension. If they have not yet been suspended for a game they have won, a reroll will be approved no matter how old it is."
Comment has been collapsed.
Thank you for that as I wasn't 100% sure about this. :-)
So in the end it never hurts to ask SG support for a re-roll as giveaway creators have no way of knowing if a winner that has non-activated games has already been suspended or not.
Comment has been collapsed.
26 Comments - Last post 55 seconds ago by JHartmann
1,570 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by uchihaitachics
17 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by DrTenma
39 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by DanteOP
170 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ObsidianSpire
41 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Chris76de
31 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
301 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by m0r1arty
67 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by KingLuiso
150 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by vitmovl
30,180 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Finical
4,017 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by yugimax
150 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by SerenaM
What difference does it make which month the non-activated wins are, if the person hasn't been reported yet?
In other words, if someone has unactivated wins from last month, but no one ever reported them, but then someone discovers them this month, is it too late? Is there some kind of statute of limitations on rule violations?
Comment has been collapsed.