Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Game | Ratings | Retail Price |
---|---|---|
Star Wolves | 80% of 174 reviews | $3.99 |
Star Wolves 2 | 39% of 73 reviews | $3.99 |
Star Wolves 3: Civil War | 79% of 242 reviews | $4.99 |
State of Anarchy | 84% of 667 reviews | $0.99 |
Stay Dead Evolution | 60% of 15 reviews | $5.99 |
Steredenn | 89% of 348 reviews | $12.99 |
Stereo Aereo | 81% of 16 reviews | $3.99 |
Stikbold! A Dodgeball Adventure | 89% of 103 reviews | $9.99 |
Still Life | 81% of 383 reviews | $7.99 |
Still Life 2 | 44% of 209 reviews | $7.99 |
Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People: Season 1 | 92% of 164 reviews | $19.99 |
Subject 13☠ | 52% of 72 reviews | $9.99 |
Sudokuball Detective | 31% of 16 reviews | $2.99 |
SuperPower 2 Steam Edition | 78% of 1,250 reviews | $9.99 |
Syberia☠ | 88% of 1,513 reviews | $12.99 |
Syberia II☠ | 84% of 616 reviews | $12.99 |
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
Non-Steam games:
100% Hidden Objects 2
1001 Nights - The Adventures of Sindbad
A Girl in the City - Extended Edition
A Moon For The Sky
Alexandra Fortune: Mystery Of The Lunar Archipelago
Amanda Rose: The Game of Time
Amelie's Cafe
Babel Running
Baby Blimp
Bar-Bury-'Em
Behind the Reflection
Biggest Little Adventure
Blank Slate
Burn it All - Journey to the Sun
Campfire Legends: The Babysitter
Campfire Legends: The Hookman
Campfire Legends: The Last Act
Cardboard Castle
Carefree Capers: Shaping up!
Caribbean Sea Fishes
Cathy's Crafts Platinum Edition
Chameleon Cancellation
Compile
Crashtastrophy
Criminal Minds
Crop Busters
Cubis Kingdoms
Delicious
Delicious - Emily's Childhood Memories
Delicious - Emily's Holiday Season
Delicious - Emily's Honeymoon Cruise
Delicious - Emily's Taste of Fame
Delicious - Emily's Tea Garden
Delicious - Emily's True Love
Delicious - Emily's Wonder Wedding
Delicious 2
Fabulous - Angela's Sweet Revenge
Farm 2
Farm Frenzy 3: Ice Age
Farm Frenzy 3: Russian Roulette
Farm Frenzy: Ancient Rome
Farm Frenzy: Gone Fishing
Farm Frenzy: Viking Heroes
Fashion Craze
Fate of the Pharaoh
Fish 'n Ships
Forbidden Secrets: Alien Town Collector's Edition
Frogs vs. Storks
FunPack: Dive Olly Dive
FunPack: Kids
FunPack: Mums
Funpack: Chloe's Closet
Funpack: La Fountaine's Fables Universe
Garden Shop - Rush Hour
Garfield's Wild Ride
Ghost Whisperer
Gold Rush - Treasure Hunt
Governor of Poker
Heart's Medicine - Season One
Heroes & Heretics
Home Design 3D: Outdoor / Garden
Home Design 3D: My Dream Home
Hometown Poker Hero
Hotel Mahjong
Hotel Solitaire
IREM Arcade Hits
Jane Austen's Estate of Affairs
Jazz, Trump's Journey
Krypton Egg
Kung Fu Rabbit
Ladybugs Lines
Legacy Tales: Mercy of the Gallows Collector's Edition
Legacy Tales: Mercy of the Gallows Standard Edition
Mahjong Fortuna
Mahjong Fortuna 2
Marie Antoinette and the Disciples of Loki
Monument Builders - Colosseum
Monument Builders - Notre Dame
Monument Builders - Rushmore https://store.steampowered.com/app/564340/5in1_Pack__Monument_Builders_Destination_USA/
Mortimer Beckett and the Book of Gold
Mortimer Beckett and the Crimson Thief
Mortimer Beckett and the Lost King
Mortimer Beckett and the Secrets of the Spooky Manor
Mortimer Beckett and the Time Paradox
Moto Racer 2 https://store.steampowered.com/app/324110/Moto_Racer_Collection/
Murder She Wrote 2: Return to Cabot Cove
My Puzzles
Newt One
Nicky Boom
Nicky Boom 2
OIO
Pastry Passion
Piggly
Police Force
Police Force 2
Psych
Pugovki
Pyro Jump
Red Cross: Emergency Response Unit
Remington Super Slam Hunting: Alaska
Sally’s Salon - Beauty Secrets
Saving Private Sheep
Saving Private Sheep 2
See Me
Set Sail: Caribbean
Sky Chasers
Soldier vs. Aliens
Spaceship 729
Surgery Simulator 2011
Tarzan Unleashed
Ted The Jumper
The Princess Case: A Royal Scoop
The Treasures of Montezuma
Ultimate Body Blows
Voyage to Fantasy: Part 1
Well Balanced
World Rally Fever
Worms 2
Worms Forts: Under Siege
Worms United
Youda Fairy
Youda Farmer
Youda Farmer 2
Youda Farmer 3
Youda Fisherman
Youda Jewel Shop
Youda Legend: The Curse of the Amsterdam Diamond
Youda Legend: The Golden Bird of Paradise
Youda Marina
Youda Mystery: The Stanwick Legacy
Youda Safari
Youda Survivor
Youda Survivor 2
Youda Sushi Chef
Youda Sushi Chef 2
Zephyrus
Comment has been collapsed.
Check vs Mate is actually the same game as Battle vs Chess: they are available in different regions under 2 different names.
Dream Pinball 3D
Comment has been collapsed.
Both versions are currently available through Steam. If you have the US store you get Check vs. Mate, everywhere else gets Battle vs Chess. Regardless of which version your store gets though you can still own both.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually, US, Canada and Mexico see Check vs. Mate on Steam store, others - Battle vs Chess.
Comment has been collapsed.
Depends how you want to look at it. Whilst the content is the same in both versions they're being counted as separate games on digital distribution platforms. It's the same on Steam where you can own both versions regardless of which version the store lists for your region.
Comment has been collapsed.
I see your point, but when there is no difference in content, then there is no reason to treat them as separate games in terms of playing. It makes sense mostly for collecting, which hardly can be applied to such digital distribution platform, where all have subscription for the same list of games.
Comment has been collapsed.
Unlike most people so far, I do think that the subscription model is the future.
I will not subscribe to Utomik at the moment, because I believe they are still missing 2 key components:
I think it's worth mentioning Geforce Now (by Nvidia), as another good example of the future technologies we'll be all using. Unfortunately, it suffers from the same issues - not enough games, and no popular current games, and technology - you need to pay hundreds fo $ for Nvidia Shiled box (which doesn't even support Steam streaming).
I believe the future is going towards technologies like what OnLive used to do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OnLive
Basically, the games run on their servers, and you can play them via streaming on your PC, TV, Tablet, Phone or whatever device you choose. So you can start playing a game on your TV, then when someone else needs the TV, move to your PC, and then leave your house to go somewhere and continue playing on the bus/train (on your phone).
For this service, I will happily pay a monthly fee.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ask the people who bought Darkspore. Live services works if they're live. That's a big IF.
Also, several reasons. The worst aspects are covered pretty well in this videos from Jim Sterling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSQOJqikw8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=166UJe9-P-8
Long story short, it's all about squeezing money from gamers. I like to buy a game, have it, play it, and keep it. I still play games 30+ years old. They're mine. I don't have to continue to pay a service to play them. Some of them weren't popular at the time. Can't buy them anywhere, can't play them anywhere else.
Comment has been collapsed.
You're describing a BAD service, not a service.
That's like saying Netflix is bad, because if their servers are down you can't watch movies, while a DVD you own and can watch 30 years later.
This is why you have redundancy, high availability and disaster recovery technologies. So services are never down. Furthermore, while a DVD will stop working after 7-10 years, a service can maintain machines running emulators and allow you to run any old game (or any new game) without any effort on your part. It's actually saving you lots of money, by not requiring you to maintain a gaming rig at home. In addition to making it convenient for you to play where you want, when you want.
Steam in-home streaming for example, has been a real revolution at my home. Instead of being forced to play at my PC, I now have the ability to play in a big screen TV in the living room, or to take the games anywhere I want on my Surface. Gaming as a service is simply the next logical step.
Think if Netflix, but with gaming. Wouldn't it be great?
Comment has been collapsed.
Subscription services can be absolutely wonderful, if they offer:
Good selection
Affordable price
The service quality is on par with expectations
Of course individual efforts / tries can be bad, but imagine accessing your library's worth of games for like 5-10$ a month, like one can do with Netflix. Small things like "I still play games 30+ years old. They're mine. I don't have to continue to pay a service to play them." are redundant, if you keep the subscription going because you have new things to play, and also can return to the old ones. Like I plan to play a few year's worth of games for my library while I already "own" them, this shows if a service can offer a lot of content for the future, you don't feel like accessing it for the sake of accessing a game you already finished, in case you want to play it.
Of course, the current question of "is there a good subscription service?" is another issue, it's between an eeeeeh and a maaaybe :D Not owning close to anything (or really anything?) from the selection of Origin Access it really makes me super interested about it as there are like a dozen games there I would play, but when overbundled (if I already own them), half-mobile, half-timewaster games makes up majority of the selection then it's not a really attractive option. From Utomik I think I've seen 3 wishlisted games on the whole list. Though because of the selection it's still quite an excellent selection for example to gift a subscription to a friend who only plays casually for a few hours a week, to find what they like. (Having Force Unleashed, Sam & Max, Stasis and some others... there are pretty cool games here too. That I already own :D )
Comment has been collapsed.
Just watched the 2 videos you linked. They guy is somewhat right, but mostly wrong/skewing the facts.
Is what Ubisfot trying to do bad? yes
Are they calling it Gaming-as-a-service? yes
Does it have anything to do with real Gaming-as-a-service concept? no
First of all, he's talking about game publishers, but he's forgetting that GAME PUBLISHERS DO NOT MAKE GAMES. Never did. Never will. Game publishers make money off other people's games. They even own development studios sometimes. But they do no make them. And the fact that they plan on continue not making games, but make money differently has no impact on the gaming world whatsoever. If Publisher-owned studios will not make games (or only make shit money-grab games) it will not be the end of the gaming industry. Valve stopped making games (because they make far more money off Steam) and nobody died. Blizzard stopped making games (because they make much more money from online engagements) and nobody died. There are still plenty of good games around.
As an afterthought, even his "prove-a-point" examples are stupid. Adobe offering a yearly-subscription model is not an example of SaaS (Software-as-a-Service). Facebook, Google and WhatsApp are all SaaS. And they're all free. Netflix is SaaS, and is hugely successful. The fact that someone makes a bad service, doesn't mean the method doesn't work, it means that specific product doesn't work. And in Adobe's case, it's not even SaaS!
Comment has been collapsed.
I think that the worse examples of past time (Darkspore, old NBA 2K, titles), and the model that Ubisoft and others are pushing in are a ticking bomb.
Netflix is an awful example. There are plenty of shows that I watched, that I can't watch again because they were discontinued, lost rights, etc. I have wonderful titles on my steam library that people can't buy legally today. Imagine that on a streaming service. I still play OutRun 2006: Coast 2 Coast, on a regular basis, and thats because I have a copy of the game.
Look what happened to Scott Pilgrim on PS3. That happened many times. We need redundant options, because if not, we can lost access to a game forever, or have to pray for a miracle in the legal department.
Comment has been collapsed.
Actually, people keep forgetting that Steam is SaaS as well. You're putting Steam and Netflix as opposite examples, but in fact they are very similar. In Netflix, some shows can be delisted, and cannot watch them anymore. Unless you've downloaded their episodes, in which case you can still watch them. And in Steam some games are delisted, so you can't buy them anymore, unless you already own them... In Steam you're also responsible for games being compatible to your PC/OS, while in Netflix all shows are presented in a uniform fashion (there could have been PAL/NTSC issues for example). So they're not completely identical. One thing they do share, is that if tomorrow Steam or Netflix servers are taken offline, you lose access to all your Netflix shows, and all the Steam games you "own".
I do acknowledge that there are shows not listed of Netflix because they were removed (or never appeared, like older shows). Moreover, you didn't mention it, but Netflix has competitors, so Amazon, Hulu or HBO shows will (probably) never appear on Netflix, and you'll need to pay their competitors (as well) to watch their shows. There is a solution though - I don't believe this situation, where there are several competing services, each demanding payment for it's own content, can exist in the long run. Where I live for example, the TV content companies act as an "aggregator" buying content from all companies, so by paying them, you get content from Netflix, Hulu, HBO, etc. all at the same place (Although, they are costlier than each service alone).
Similarly, in the gaming market, you have Steam (which is by far the largest player), but others have noticed the economic potential and are actively trying to capitalize it. This is why we now have the Origin and UPlay stores, both with unique content which cannot be found on the other stores. So to play all the games you want, you need to install Steam client, Origin client and UPlay client. Adding Ubisoft store with Ubisoft client doesn't change the picture dramatically. And as with video Streaming services, eventually, I believe the model will not be able to work in the long run, and a consolidation will happen. Either by one company buying the others (or via a merger) or simply by the appearance of a new type of companies, which will have the ability to aggregate games from different marketplaces, and allowing you to access them in a single convenient location. This is what I believe Gaming-as-a-service companies will do (they will install the games on their servers, and you will play them via streaming).
And if you still want to own a game (because you really like it, and sure you'll want to play it in the future) you'll be able to buy it on a physical DVD, or a DRM-free method (GOG for example) and own it for life. But I do believe that this will be a very small minority of games, because looking at the PC gaming market, it looks like the number of games (even good games) is growing exponentially. Steam has added in 2017 15,000 new games. That's X2 more than 2016, which had X2 more than 2015, etc. So even if only 1% of these games is very good, that's still a huge number of games. Which brings me to wonder if we'll even be replaying old games in the future... If there is such a vast selection of good games to choose from (and considering Hardware will no longer be a limitation) I don't know how people will have time to revisit old games, when each person has a huge backlog of new games to try. I see it in myself already, My Steam backlog is so big, some games I bought recently because they are very good, will never be played, because by the time I finish playing all the games I want to play more, I will have new games in my backlog I want to play even more. And I have a total of 200+ games. Think of people with thousands of games and hundreds of them in their backlog at any given moment...
P.S. Thinking of replacing a $60 per-game with a $10 dollar per-month subscription model may seem expensive (because playing for 2 years will cost you X4 the full price of the game). But considering that in addition to the game, you will get all the DLCs, that actually amount to ~$120 price per game. And you get to play not just one game, but a bunch of AAA games for the same monthly price (All of which you would otherwise buy for full price). So eventually people will be spending less, not more.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm aware of the pros and cons of the actual market, and so is that I'm slowly migrating to GOG, for the reasons you expose here. In comparison of the added games, well. Steam grows exponentially, but GoG have a curated database, so it's more likely to find quality content there.
Still, in Steam you spend at your own pace, you could even ever spend a dime there, and still play dozens or hundreds of games. And you can keep the games you bought. I paid my quota every month on Netflix, and still miss the lost shows and movies. If I spend 10-30 bucks on a DVD or a BluRay, they are on my collection forever.
I have problems with storage space, of course, like every other person, so I invest some money on this "services", but I don't like the way this trend is unfolding.
Comment has been collapsed.
Because once you can't pay for that service you lose access to all the games. You can't play anything. Unlike Steam, that offers free games, plus you keep all the licenses you paid for and can play them anytime, even if you don't have money.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes, but in games-as-a-servuce model you don't pay anything for the games. They are all 100% free as long as you're subscribed. Just like in Netflix, you can watcg all episodes of Friends without paying like $200 that their DVD would cost. The free games will still remain free, you don't need to have a subscription service to play free games. You don't need a high-end computer either. But the AAA titles that now cost you an arm and a leg, would only cost you the subscription service cost.
Comment has been collapsed.
would only cost you the subscription service cost.
As long as I'm able to afford that fee. This is my point. Today I have no money problem [thank God]. I got a job and can buy anything I want. But if my only gaming platform were subscription based and I suddenly couldn't afford that subscription anymore, then I would lose access to all those games and wouldn't be able to play them. In the end, it's a rental service much like Netflix. You can watch anything as long as you pay their monthly fee [a fee that gets more expensive with each passing year]. Which is another point. The fee for Utomik might be cheap/fair now, but it will get more expensive soon enough. They will add more games and will have to pay more devs/publishers. And that money will have to come from the customers.
AAA titles that now cost you anything arm and a leg
Only if I want them to, because I can perfectly wait for a sale.
Comment has been collapsed.
As long as I'm able to afford that fee. This is my point. Today I have no money problem [thank God]. I got a job and can buy anything I want. But if my only gaming platform were subscription based and I suddenly couldn't afford that subscription anymore, then I would lose access to all those games and wouldn't be able to play them.
That is true. But let's say you play 10 full price games a year (or their equivalent). So it would cost you 10 X $50 = $500 to buy them and own them forever. If let's say a subscription service is $12 a month (like Netflix), it would cost you $12 X 12 = $144 to play them for 1 year (only). Let's say after 1 year you lose your job and can't afford a subscription service (although it seems that it's cheap enough to afford even without a job, if it's important enough for you). Even if 2-3 of these games you want to keep playing after finished them, buying only these 2-3 games (even at full price) AND paying a year for a subscription will still cost less than buying all 10 games.
Now it's true you could have bought only 2-3 games in the first place, but then A. How would you know which games you would like without trying them? B. You wouldn't get to try/enjoy the other 7-8 games. If to compare to Netflix, would you be willing to pay per movie/TV show separately instead of paying Netflix $12 per month? Btw, right now on Amazon Video you can buy an old movie for $10+ and a an old TV show season for $15+. Even if there is a 50% sale, it's still $5 per movie and $7.5 per tv show season (And that's for old movies). Would you pay these prices knowing you can get a subscription for $12 a month?
Sure, right now you can buy a full Civ V or Total War Rome II or GTA IV for $10 (during a sale)... But wouldn't you rather play Civ VI and Total War Warhammer II and GTA V, all for $12 a month?
Comment has been collapsed.
But let's say you play 10 full price games a year (or their equivalent). So it would cost you 10 X $50 = $500 to buy them and own them forever.
That's not the reality we live in. With Steam sales, bundle sites and this very own website, you get spend much less for a lot more games. All you have to do is wait.
A. How would you know which games you would like without trying them?
I do know myself well enough. I do have my preferences in game genders.
Even if there is a 50% sale, it's still $5 per movie and $7.5 per tv show season (And that's for old movies). Would you pay these prices knowing you can get a subscription for $12 a month?
Yes. I buy DVD boxes of my favorite TV shows every time I get a chance. There has been a great sale in the past years here and I bought 23 seasons last year and another 15 the year before.
Netflix shows aren't forever and they will be delisted anytime in the future. So I sure won't be able to watch something specific I really enjoy and feel like watching at that moment.
Sure, right now you can buy a full Civ V or Total War Rome II or GTA IV for $10 (during a sale)... But wouldn't you rather play Civ VI and Total War Warhammer II and GTA V, all for $12 a month?
No really. Playing Civ VI and Total War Warhammer II and GTA V knowing I can only do that as long as I pay for a service is not that satisfying. A service I'm subjected to even if they alter the price or terms. Feels like wasted money if for some reason I decided to unsubscribe. Plus, it's the same as Netflix. A game can be delisted anytime for any reason. What if it's a multiplayer you spent 500 hours playing?
Comment has been collapsed.
You dont need shield for Geforce now, its more or less like OnLive.
Comment has been collapsed.
Oh, I see you're right. They used to only have what is now called "GeForce Now for Shield". But I see they are now beta testing GeForce Now running directly on your PC. Very cool.
Although it currently only runs games you own on Steam, and only a limited list of them, and only works on Windows/Mac. So is not very practical in it's current state...
Comment has been collapsed.
nah it can other games than steam. I know it allows for league and minecraft which is not steam games. and the windows/mac is most of gamers so they really dont need to target linux if they did not want to.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yeah, but my point is it's a limited list of games. I can't just choose any game I want, and they install it in their cloud and let me play. Hell, I can't even choose any Steam game I want. It's limited to a list of about 150 games, and you need to buy them if you want to play any of them.
Comment has been collapsed.
now they prob did not mean for this, but I mean you can download steam games on there servers. Nothing is stopping you, I did it, but I didnt like geforce now because it does mess with ping alot.
Comment has been collapsed.
Your work is gold.
Now I have no choice but to try the program. I wouldn't if I didn't have your list :)
Comment has been collapsed.
21 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by Mitsukuni
898 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by InSpec
704 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by JJJ7
31 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by drabit642
1,036 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by sensualshakti
1,942 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by MeguminShiro
228 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Dizzard
358 Comments - Last post 45 seconds ago by LagiNatoRRR
31 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by AmanoTC
100 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Reimaishere
9,458 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by insideAfireball
63 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Xeradan
360 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by krol7
140 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by dsbaml
I'm a big fan of charts, so I thought I'd make a giant one of Utomik to compare what they offer with my current library. This way I can see more easily if there is something interesting to play that I don't have, I hope it will be useful for more people.
Utomik: https://www.utomik.com
Chart created with Lex's SG Chart Maker with some modifications.
Comment has been collapsed.