The Department of Redundancy Department would like to invite you to become a member.
Comment has been collapsed.
You mean a deflationary monetary policy? -_- I'm not sure you're using "inflation" correctly.
Comment has been collapsed.
15 Comments - Last post 52 minutes ago by Fluffster
427 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Ekaros
1 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by spodamayn
1,350 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by WeakSweet
21 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by LinustheBold
6 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by m0r1arty
307 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by devotee
7 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by Calibr3
3,867 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by MarvashMagalli
955 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by twigalucie
38 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by kbronct
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeltaBladeX
655 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by CBlade
54 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by faelynaris
Well, we are probably all annoyed by the fact that we all give away the same games all the time. What can we do about it?
we can limit the amount of a specific game that can be given away at any given time, but that is just annoying if you really WANT a specific game, or really wanna give it away
we can limit how many a single user can give away, they doesn't fix anything, as most people only give away one at a time.
this is IMO the best: we could add inflation, so the games that are rare give more points (cost too?) but the once that are "spammed" like the HIB's to give less (again cost?) this might encourage us to get some other games on the site :D
OFC it shouldn't be entirely based on inflation. they should still be loosely based on the price.
what do you think?
Comment has been collapsed.