+1, maybe change it so that if your bundle games represent less than 30% of your non-bundle value you get 100% of its retail value and only 10% for value that goes over that.
In more mathematical terms: you gave away
X non bundle games
Y bundle games
your contributor value is than
if Y<0.3X: X+Y,
if Y>0.3X: X+0.3X+(Y-0.3X)*0.1]
Comment has been collapsed.
8 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by magicmase
8 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by echoMateria
21 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by pb1
20 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by CelticBatman
1,447 Comments - Last post 34 minutes ago by Alfhar
9 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by steveywonder75
11 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by WarlordFred
44 Comments - Last post 30 seconds ago by noSim
7,968 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Peiperissimus
15 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by mrakotun
1 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by AllTracTurbo
2,755 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Mhol1071
52 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by wigglenose
245 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by wigglenose
I know there's a lot of discussion about CV right now, but I'm in the camp that thinks it's generally working. Here's my proposal:
Keep the bundle list, but give each giveaway a percentage of its retail value, somewhere from 10-20%.
The rationale for this:
Non-bundle games are already get marked up to retail contributed value, but are likely purchased at 25% of that cost. Your $20 gift likely cost you $5. If it was a bundle game, and it were devalued to 20% contributor value, then it assumes that the $20 gift cost you $1. But you'd still get your $4 CV, which is in line with what I assume are the majority of purchases.
It's late here, so I hope this makes sense.
Comment has been collapsed.