299 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Butterflysense
7 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeltaBladeX
31 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Gorebelly318
12 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by adam1224
31 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by magicmase
1,962 Comments - Last post 11 hours ago by slipkord
1,037 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by shijisha
191 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by steveywonder75
299 Comments - Last post 9 minutes ago by Viccae
251 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by JimLink
2,137 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Jztr
244 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by s4k1s
325 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Taurus9534
606 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by DogOnSG
Rule checking should be done automatically by the site if the admin cares. It's not my problem if someone breaks rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 9 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is exactly why I don't bother to check or report. 99% of the time when I checked, the answer from support was "already served".
None of that is any excuse for not doing it automatically.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 9 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't have anything against the present system really I don't mind doing a simple check before sending gifts, and I don't think suspensions should be given automatically but I've been wondering why it wasn't possible to at least have the system check that winners have redeemed their gifts when marking received and report to support if not. I understand that the Steam's API doesn't always reports games properly but it does works for a good numbers of games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 6 years ago.
Comment has been collapsed.