168 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by adam1224
17 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by Rexlux
490 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kiseli
6 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CelticBatman
43 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Dyna18
1,226 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by sensualshakti
1,613 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by nikolma7
10 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by GeekDoesStuff
0 Comments - Created 3 minutes ago by luizint
14 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by GeekDoesStuff
45 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by Swordoffury
354 Comments - Last post 12 minutes ago by Patxxv
57 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Habaruku
187 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by YeOldeLancer
Rule checking should be done automatically by the site if the admin cares. It's not my problem if someone breaks rules.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
This is exactly why I don't bother to check or report. 99% of the time when I checked, the answer from support was "already served".
None of that is any excuse for not doing it automatically.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 5 months ago.
Comment has been collapsed.
I don't have anything against the present system really I don't mind doing a simple check before sending gifts, and I don't think suspensions should be given automatically but I've been wondering why it wasn't possible to at least have the system check that winners have redeemed their gifts when marking received and report to support if not. I understand that the Steam's API doesn't always reports games properly but it does works for a good numbers of games.
Comment has been collapsed.
This comment was deleted 6 years ago.
Comment has been collapsed.