There is a small chance the key is already used, so please only enter if you agree to delete the giveaway in that case. Thanks and good luck!
1,593 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by sensualshakti
1 Comments - Last post 20 minutes ago by tariko
66 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by metaleroed
73 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by colddim
119 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Bin246
81 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by shak59
67 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by kudomonster
19 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by RePlayBe
46 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pingu23
103 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lugum
79 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pb1
52 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by pb1
163 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by pb1
220 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Mhol1071
Why are you requesting for deletion? What's so bad with getting a "not received" mark once or twice if you cannot find a replacement?
Comment has been collapsed.
To be honest i have not thought about this too much, but i saw that others are doing this aswell. And isn't it the best choice to just delete the giveaway? I don't see the upside of not doing it this way.
Comment has been collapsed.
Not really an upside but:
1- Users can't really enforce this rule. It's up to the winner to decide.
2- Nothing wrong with having a couple of not received GAs. AFAIK, there are no repercussions from SG if you have "not received" GAs, it's just a metric that warns other users that you have had some bad keys in the past. And that should be the indicator that users should enter at their own risk; not having to ask every time for deletion.
This can be a long discussion, and of course you can write what you want, I've been just wondering why people care so much about the "not received" marks like there was some serious penalty.
Also FYI: https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/5fkrA/psa-about-deleting-giveaways
Comment has been collapsed.
Ok, ty for the info and the link.
Comment has been collapsed.
despite the description, key works:) thank you!
Comment has been collapsed.