Help rapper B.o.B prove the world is flat.

Heh, touché

Yeah I remember watching Vsauce and him mentioning something of the sorts. I better start running!

Or pretty terrible sense of scale.

No way, haven't you seen a lunar eclipse?

View attached image.

That's not proper scientific proof tho. (and the Earth in "it is round" is actually not a symmetric ball)

a) That argument talks about as if Sun were not moving and Earth neither, with it being compared to Sun being as if center light of Earth as basketball court that is not tilted at all (but then goes on to talk about all of a sudden assumed tilt as clearly confirming "roundness"). Even the premises of that argument lack proof, such as about that whole issue of movement of celestial bodies (such as whether Sun is moving at all, or not, etc.).

Other than that, to say "flat" doesn't necessarily exclude e.g. two sides or e.g. square shape. Seriously, if you assume a big mass object in space shaped like a cube, what's gravity doing on its edges anyhow?

b) Easily photo-shopped etc. And again, "flat" doesn't mean that Earth doesn't have north and south sides, similar to e.g. a vinyl.

c) "Single-direction course" on a "round Earth", as in "straight line" to prove it is round? Lol? A needle on a gramophone ends up pretty much where it started on each circumcision, but that doesn't mean a vinyl would be a ball.

As for the issue of "perspective", assuming that objects seem smaller in distance than they are, one can easily argue that the alleged "curve" exists only because the viewer has that middle point of the horizon-line closer than the points on the edges of that line. Or mathematically put, when viewer is in point A and looks at a line where there are points B and D on the seen edges and point C in the middle between points B and D, then the distance between A and C is closer than distance between A and B or A and D, as can be easily shown by measurement of those distances.

To clearify, I do not see myself a proponent of "Earth is flat", but my point still stands in regard to that what many seem to be presenting is nothing but parroting "hear-say" while they themselves apparently wouldn't be able to e.g. measure and calculate how much surface a symmetrical ball in front of them has, which arguably is a mathematical operation not really anywhere near e.g. quantum physics.

The article on that link at least seems to have some effort put into it, but again, e.g. just because you can see a curve during Lunar eclipse doesn't mean Earth is not a vinyl to begin with. Also,
2) there are even tsunamis on the Sea, behind which one can probably hardly see anything.
3) That light bends around mass seems to have been proven in physics, and due to that are some stars arguably not view-able from some points on the vinyl, or simply have some object in between (as in that it can take only one step to see what is behind the corner of a building one didn't see before).
4) If one tilts that mentioned basketball court, shadows will be different on it as well, wouldn't they?
5) That argument assumes there is no e.g. smog obscuring view from a peasant's point of view. Not exactly realistic, is it?
6) Again, needle on a vinyl is not falling off edge neither. And a big mass vinyl in space doesn't necessarily mean one could notice being on the edge of the sides, would it?
7) Just because you are all cool doesn't mean I am. Or in regard to mentioned planets, even if one assumes that all planets are quite the same in shape, those other planets may be vinyls too.
8) Again, one can present vinyl tilt and movement that explains time-zones as well.
9) That is an interesting one - if one assumes laws of gravity to be proven. But there are also things such as e.g. the barycenter, which e.g. between Moon and Earth is not really at the center of Earth to begin with.
10) Even without photoshopping, e.g. looking at part of a vinyl doesn't make that vinyl a ball.

I imagine the guy going "Oh god, this is actually working. Lets see how much I can squeeze out of them, maybe a new car or even a house renovation."

Where is he going to find the scientists that know how to launch and keep a satellite in the air above a flat Earth? I mean, all the existing satellites were launched by lying lairs who say the world is a sphere, I am sure he doesn't want the help of those lairs.

Are there actual scientists (with the proper education in this field of science) that believe the earth is flat?

Hehe, not why i posted that but thank you for the whitelist, and for the good wishes.

thx for filling the void saved for future use