Can dis hapen?
Your expectations are right:
Custom rule is not well constructed Unexpected token "punctuation" of value "(" around position 165
Comment has been collapsed.
Wait, let me try to deconstruct the rules:
- They didn't win more than 25% region-restricted in total.
- They meet at least one of these:
- They wishlisted the game the day before with less than 250 wishlisted games in total, regardles of any ratios.
- They won maximum 5 times as much as they sent (both in CV and numbers) with their sent games sportin a minimum of 45% public CV ratio and a minimum of 75% region-free CV ratio.
- They are level 3+, but the combination of their region-restricted and group sent CV is maximum 80% of their total CV, including maximum 70% private and 35% region-restricted giveaways. Also, they must have won maximum 2.5 times more than they sent.
- Each and every one of their sent games, without exception, has been fully public (with no whitelist, invite-only, or group giveaways ever).
- Additionally, regardless of the list above, they also cannot touch region-restricted things too much, since only 5% of their sent and 10% of their won ones can be anything but ROW, regardless of the looser rules in the second and third bullet, contradicting the initial first restriction of 25% region-restricted wins.
- And finally, they must have won only three times as much as they sent, contradicting the third bullet.
I think you are missing a few parenthesis. If you are making such a complex rule, try to separate them into rows, construct each one individually, then add the logical operators between the larger blocks.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Each and every one of their sent games, without exception, has been fully public (with no whitelist, invite-only, or group giveaways ever)." is an entirely different path from the rest :)
I forgot a min sent CV there though, on that path.
path1:
no trade ban, activated stuff, etc
"They didn't win more than 25% region-restricted in total."
and one of:
- "They wishlisted the game <latest> the day before with less than 250 wishlisted games in total, regardles of any ratios."
- "They won maximum 5 times as much as they sent (both in CV and numbers) with their sent games sportin a minimum of 45% public CV ratio and a minimum of 75% region-free CV ratio."
- "They are level 3+, but the combination of their region-restricted and group sent CV is maximum 80% of their total CV, including maximum 70% private and 35% region-restricted giveaways. Also, they must have won maximum 2.5 times more than they sent."
path2, pub gifter:
"only 5% of their sent and 10% of their won ones can be anything but ROW"
"Each and every one of their sent games, without exception, has been fully public"
"they must have won only three times as much as they sent"
<min CV added>
Comment has been collapsed.
Then it should be more like this:
(
trade_ban == false
AND
pass_activated_rule == true
AND
last_multiple_win <= date_modify(date('now'), '-2 years')
AND
real_won_region_restricted/real_won_cv <= 0.25
AND
(
(wishlist_date <= date('2017/03/20')
AND num_wishlisted_games <= 250)
OR
(ratio_number_giveaways >= 0.2
AND ratio_real >= 0.2
AND real_sent_public/real_sent_cv >= 0.45
AND real_sent_region_restricted/real_sent_cv <= 0.25)
OR
(level >= 3
AND (real_sent_group+real_sent_region_restricted)/real_sent_cv <= 0.8
AND real_sent_private/real_sent_cv <= 0.7
AND real_sent_region_restricted/real_sent_cv <= 0.35
AND ratio_real > 0.4)
)
)
OR
(
real_sent_public/real_sent_cv == 1
AND
real_sent_region_restricted/real_sent_cv <= 0.05
AND
real_won_region_restricted/real_won_cv <= 0.1
AND
ratio_real > 0.3
AND
real_sent_cv >= 300
)If you construct the rules like a code, then all you need is to remove the linebreaks and white spaces after it looks good and paste it. Less chance to mess it up somewhere.
Comment has been collapsed.
But do you find anything wrong with mine, or are you just on a crusade for extra braces?
Comment has been collapsed.
Yours is missing parentheses. The best way to explain is that currently they have to comply to both path1+path2 together, but not exactly: the "all games have to be fully public" rule is not grouped together with what is coming after it, it is grouped with that long list: if someone complies to one element of that long list, then the real_sent_public/real_sent_cv == 1 rule is disregarded.
Comment has been collapsed.
"They didn't win more than 25% region-restricted in total."
...
"10% of their won ones can be anything but ROW""
Why do you care if they won region-restricted games? It's possible that a user won only region-restricted games, but gave 3 times as many ROW keys. This user would fail the rule, but probably win a spot on many whitelists xD
"including maximum 70% private"
I doubt you'll find many (if any) users that meet this requirement. Forum GAs are my favorite type, but I'm still far short of this requirement, with only 53%.
"Each and every one of their sent games, without exception, has been fully public"
This too is a very tough criterion, especially for users that are actively creating GAs and didn't just send a few games.
I did pass btw, but I'm not sure why. Too lazy too load my numbers into the rule though ;-)
Comment has been collapsed.
I am also searching for this upgrade for this budget :) #Hope
Comment has been collapsed.
You won't get it for $2.
At best, it was in a high tier Humble bundle for $15.
Comment has been collapsed.
($15-BTA)/$15tiergamecount is less than $2, I'd wager.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's not necessarily how it works, especially not once the bundle is over and that price is no longer available.
Comment has been collapsed.
Lol... sadly, I am not sure you can calculate like that...
BTA is just dependent of how many people buy $15 tier.
If people interested in Clickteam Fusion don't buy BTA but only $15 tier (especially for developer upgrade), BTA will be close to $15 of course.
I don't think you will find sellers of your wanted item for $2 tbh.
I think people just bought either $1 tier or $15 tier.
If you find several sellers, choose the cheapest one. But I am not sure you will find many of them.
Just buying back the full bundle would be a good opportunity.
Comment has been collapsed.
Kinda substitutes asking for a trade, and that's what steamtrades.com is for.
What omicron already said, upgrade version never went cheap. only base and platform exporters.
Comment has been collapsed.
For 2$ not a chance , for 20$ yeah, that's how much i sold mine for
Comment has been collapsed.
For info, it was on tremorgames for 2999Coins it's like 3-4$ but it's out of stock :/
Comment has been collapsed.
I failed to obtain this when it was bundled a thousand gazillion years ago, but now I realise it would help a close friend realise their lifelong dream. Warning, the above might not be 102% true. Be careful not to swallow small parts. Batteries not included. old GA not included.
This was my first SG Tools giveaway and my first giveaway over here, so expect my crazy rules to malfunction and my blacklist to club everything
GA not part of this thread
GA2 not part of this thread
Before the best trading post in all the lands – the glorious Barter.VG – started dying a horribly painful death, the good people on it already had basically no copies left (I managed to just miss a few of the last ones). I don't really dare to venture into the undiscovered lands of SteamTrades. What do?
tl:dr;
want http://store.steampowered.com/app/267810/
have $2 budget
no GA here, go away.
Comment has been collapsed.