All to devs. If charity was WWF, or something like it then it would be all to them.
Comment has been collapsed.
I put the Humble Tip to 0%, then split the rest almost even.
Comment has been collapsed.
That is very true, but in my experience (from my rl friends), many people dont change the sliders at all which leaves HB getting a rather large tip (and more than I think their service is worth).
Its just down to my personal preference. I offset a little of the tip my friends leave by giving none myself.
Comment has been collapsed.
Depends who the dev is and whether or not I've already tried (and liked) some of the games. Usually charity/devs get ~90% between them with the most going to charity, then the 10% humble tip.
Comment has been collapsed.
depending on developer either all to them or all to HB
Comment has been collapsed.
most of times it goes all to charity. sometimes like in the last weekly i give all to developer because i really like what they do
Comment has been collapsed.
Giving non to charity is really a pointless thing to do. The website is meant to be for charity and the game developers published their games there for charity donations.
Comment has been collapsed.
I haven't had the feeling yet that a single game in any bundle as of today was put in that bundle to generate money for charity. They all put it there to get money in their own pockets for sure. The whole charity "theme" just helps to increase sales/the avg price.
Comment has been collapsed.
I disagree unless you actually have proof of what you say.
Comment has been collapsed.
The charity is a marketing trick. The default split (which many, many people use) is 65% to devs, 20% to charity and 15% to Humble.
If it was a charity drive it would either be 100% to charity or the default split would be very different. As it is now, it's a retailer selling games for developer profit; with a charitable donation on the side.
Comment has been collapsed.
They are not running charity drives. They are a (partly)charity driven company. Huge difference.
And $32 million dollars to charity is still quite nice.(out of 84 million dollars in total revenue)
No other "retailer" have a defualt split like that.
Comment has been collapsed.
Exactly. While their philanthropy is nice, people need to stop referring to Humble Inc as a charity. They are just as much in it to make money for themselves and their dev partners as they are to collect donations for charity.
Comment has been collapsed.
103 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by ViToos
144 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Icepick87
20 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by cowbell
2,894 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by MeguminShiro
1,681 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by omegathirteen
1,272 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by Vincenzo77
211 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by MeguminShiro
455 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by Carenard
109 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by CaspianRoach
844 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by nigelt74
10,762 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by llM4x1m0ll
1,086 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Arwiee
92 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Cassol
92 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Gxgear
I always give all to developers because i'm buying games and i want the makers of all these games happy .
I really hate when people says "its for charity", when in my opinion its for the games.
Comment has been collapsed.