By the way, if you're not from US so you think you shouldn't care, think twice. Most countries in the world use US as a role model for legislation and regulations. Especially regarding the internet, since they invented it.
In Brazil they tried to end net neutrality once, it didn't work. But now since US did it (even tho its still subjected to appeals and whatever Congress can do about it) they already said they want to try it again.
So if you're not whiling to spread the word to help our fellow internet users from US out of empathy, do it because it will most likely affect you in the future.
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, fuck. I really hope Brazilians stand up against it.
Comment has been collapsed.
after hearing as much sides as possible i came to the conclusion that i dont know whos screwing who anymore but the usa will definitelly get so in the long run, in one way or another. all burgers are in the position to do is to choose between being buttraped by seemingly repressive, control-hungry governors or by shekel-hungry companies. best to choose well.
https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/436807/net-neutrality-government-control
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/uid/Ujrb3cep/ (cringy as much as a reddit post but worth a read)
Comment has been collapsed.
Just when I thought the Alabama win was a glimpse of hope for America... Sucks for you guys, I hope other countries aren't affected by this.
Comment has been collapsed.
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2017/12/19/comcast-cox-frontier-net-neutrality/
In all cases, these are increases for essentially the same services, with Bode noting that American will be stuck paying ‘significantly more money for the same service in the new year’. In many cases, the changes are padded into existing bills, with most consumers failing to see the changes.
Comment has been collapsed.
Armstrong Zoom, a northeastern US ISP with about a million subscribers, has sent its customers warnings that they have been accused of copyright infringement, and that subsequent accusations would lead to having their network connections slowed to the point of uselessness, which could impair their ability to control their internet-connected thermostats. In the regions in which Armstrong Zoom operates, a malfunctioning thermostat in winter could result in frozen pipes, floods, and death of pets and even people. Note that the punishments Armstrong Zoom is threatening have no due process, and the customers are considered guilty without even the chance to prove themselves innocent.
https://boingboing.net/2017/12/27/winter-is-coming.html
Throttling as a punishment, evidence not required. If only there was some form of regulation against throttling internet speeds...
Comment has been collapsed.
Under the CRA, if a joint resolution of disapproval bill has enough support it can bypass committee review and be fast-tracked to a floor vote. If the bill is passed and signed into law, it would vacate the FCC's vote last month and prohibit the agency from ever trying to repeal the rules in the future. Lawmakers have 60 legislative days after the FCC submits its regulations to Congress to pass the CRA. [...] With Republicans in control of both the House and Senate, the bill faces long odds to win the simple majorities it needs to reach the president’s desk. But Democrats and activists see a clear upside in forcing GOP lawmakers to take an official stance during an election year on the consumer protections, which polls have shown to be popular among voters.
Comment has been collapsed.
You think NN was to protect telecoms? It was to protect the consumers and the website owners from traffic misdirection, favored fast lanes, and bandwith throttling....
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
25 Comments - Last post 19 minutes ago by UnrealBattousai
5 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by Golwar
81 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by popocho
8,437 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by VicViperV
41 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by pawelt
1,367 Comments - Last post 20 hours ago by thatotherone6
102 Comments - Last post 20 hours ago by BlazeHaze
53 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by StrangeAsAngels
76 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by PatchmaN
13 Comments - Last post 13 minutes ago by GangsterJochen
270 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by davidpfarrell
347 Comments - Last post 44 minutes ago by Strategius4
642 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by IronKnightAquila
123 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DrAlexander
Update (Dec. 14 2017): https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/14/technology/net-neutrality-repeal-vote.html
https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/14/16776154/fcc-net-neutrality-vote-results-rules-repealed
What to do? Urge Congress to use a “resolution of disapproval” to overturn the FCC’s decision to dismantle the Net Neutrality rules.
Comment has been collapsed.