Re-roll button for the WINNER of re-rolled GA, let WINNER can decline and re-roll without ticket.

Yes, that would be a nice addition.
I would prefer a button to "See key" rather than actually see it in case you need to ask for a re-roll and later that keys doesn't work.

BTW, in Spain that saying it's also used.

Lots of private groups around here.

Main reason why we can't have regionalized CV, for example.

Maybe a field asking the user why they want the giveaway re-rolled (with a minimum length) could help prevent misclicks. Plus it could be logged so if a user regularly refuses gifts support could look at the given reasons and see if there's any shady behavior going on.

That's a nice idea :) but yes, they would have to count the number of rerolls then.
Unfortunately this also means this solution won't work for other situations than 'lots of rerolls of same game'. Still it's better than nothing!

I'm fairly sure re-rolls aren't granted without a reason. In the scenario described above they would have to rinse and repeat so often (on average 5 times per game, assuming only one person is the intended recipient) that it'd be clear very soon that something is wrong.

Really? I wasn't aware that they would be allowed to do that, I assumed they'd quickly act on common sense if they found out. Plus, they're usually strict with what grants re-rolls and what doesn't.
EDIT: I see that there is an option named 'Winner rejected gift' so apparently you're right. I still think they'd make an exception if people were clearly abusing it, though.

(note - I used this post and the comment it's responding to as a springboard, not specifically focusing on those it becomes more of a comprehensive look at this issue, considering the times it comes up, the go-to response/reaction, and inaction that follows)

Seriously. That abuse issue always comes up as an end-all rebuttal when auto-rerolls gets mentioned and it's such a toothless critique.

I mean, if it's all about stopping abuse, we could also have GA creators email support copies of receipts to prove they own a copy to giveaway? Hey that just eliminated 95% of all fake giveaways... but it's dumb as hell because it's so much a massive bottleneck and waste of manpower for such little benefit. It's the same damn thing as clinging to manual checks everywhere instead of automating the reroll system when mutual winner/gifter consent exists. It's just crazy to me how difficult a time people have trying to see this.

Consider....

First, abuse already exists in many ways. The possibility of abuse isn't a reason not to do something highly beneficial in every other regard. Otherwise, this whole site shouldn't even exist.

Second, there are alternate checks that could be put in place. The existence of any flaw isn't a reason not to do something other, it's just a question of whether to implement a check for every 3rd reroll, etc. Or flag them and have support check out those groups later on. They'll actually have time to look into stuff like that now that they don't have a million other tickets to finish first.

Third, is that possibility for abuse any more severe or damaging than the current abuse? I mean you can already just have a group of 6-8 friends who all buy the humble monthly form a group where they trade off giveaways and never matters who wins, and (even if it did) they can still delete and then try again, so no one has to even involve support. It's such an arbitrary place to take a stand about holding back abuse instead of looking towards more efficient means to catch existing examples.

Forth, support doesn't even necessarily notice the groups doing that already with manual re-rolls in place. It's not easy getting clear proof that the group is pulling a scam and with requests are so backed up in the first place it's unlikely those situations even get the level of attention sufficient to generally notice and catch those anyway.

Five, the opportunity cost (ie, the huge amounts of time and energy chewed up) on manual rerolls also means that eliminating them frees up that same time and energy for better uses. Like in the above example, they might actually have a better shot at catching people gaming the system, and even if not, there are so many other areas of the site held up or worsened by the backlogs that could use the extra attention. And that's.. outside of the fact that the support volunteers here would probably enjoy and deserve the added free time from it too.

The benefits are massive compared to the direct cost of implementation and (more importantly) considering the HUGE opportunity costs we incur without it. It's such an obviously superior system to what we currently have in place that it is absolutely mind boggling how blind people can get because of some natural affinity for the status quo.

In my experience, with group and WL GAs it's much less the case that you have to re-roll. Actually, I don't remember a single time I had to re-roll for group or WL GAs.

I had it happen twice. But in both cases the winner won or bought the same game after entering for the GA. It's definitly less in groups though.

How would it be a waste of points? If you enter for a certain game multiple times and win it from one of them, how will it be different if you manually leave the other GAs or if it's done automatically? You can't win the same game multiple times anyway (or at least you're not allowed to), so having the system automatically remove you from GAs from the same game seems like a good idea.

Shhh, you were not supposed to notice it, i don't have money for giveaways atm ;-;

Even better. Makes a lot more sense, really.

Not sure how per giveaway slot would make sense (maybe I'm misunderstanding), so yes, I meant per giveaway.