Games you love with low Metacritic scores

I don't usually care about metacritics, so I don't even know which of my games have low score.

Risen 2...(69) btw what is "low" in your opinion ?

I found big rigs over the road racing to be fun and it had a low meta score

maelstrom~

I really want to try Ride to Hell: Retribution.

Duke Nukem Forever

i didnt love it but i liked it and thought it needed some polish

I loved Analogue: A Hate Story, and that had a score of 62 (though the user score is a much more respectable 82).

Sniper Elite: Nazi Zombie Army is pretty fun in co-op... That's the only one I can think of.

Shank has a relatively low Metacritic score, but I thoroughly enjoyed it.
8.5/10

Rogue Warrior. Aside from the lame credits music it's a solid game. Not a ground breaker by any means, but I've played far worse.

I liked the new Star Trek game. I mean it was pretty generic and it had a few bugs, but I thought it was campy and fun, especially in co-op. For those who didn't click the link, it got a 44.

Depends what one considers to be "low", but it was Analogue: A Hate Story that finally convinced me to never, ever trust professional critics. Metacritic gave the game 62/100 based on five professional reviews: two positive, two mixed, and one negative. On the other hand, 55 Metacritic users ranked the game much, much higher (as would I if I were ever inclined to rate it). Analogue holds a Metacritic user score of 8.8/10 based on 55 ratings, and of the 25 posted user reviews, 24 are positive, and one is mixed.

In other words, critics are idiots and don't deserve their paycheques.

most recently for me was xcom the bereau, its like a 66 or something and i like it alot

UnEpic. metascore: 68/100
But I like it a lots

Shank!

Marvel Heroes has a score of 58 and I have enjoyed it fairly well(currently 3rd in most hours logged for me on steam and could easily get into second place with time). I suspect much of the low score is due to the micro-transaction and drop systems at launch when most reviews get published.

That depends pretty heavily on what you consider "low". Are you grading this on a kind of "50 is mediocre and not noteworthy" scale, or the weird "75 is average, 80 is good" scale that people seem to buy into?

Postal 2, has a score of 50 due to its content, but damn is it fun.

Serious Sam HD: The First Encounter. For some reason it has a 68. I think it's low.

The other game lower which i don't get is Sonic 4 EP II. It has a 54. The game is not that terrible.

Chaos Legion is one off the top of my head, its almost like the reviewers didn't get past level 3 which would not surprise me since it was one of the harder games on PS2.

Shinobi for PS2 from what I recall, another one of the hardest games on PS2(Think IGN admitted to breaking controllers during the review).

The Last Remnant sure it was different but it was addicting because of its difference.

Post Apocalyptic Mayhem has a score of 44, it is still fun to me.

Nail'd 69/100 i found that game awesome.

"Blades of Time" - just set the annyoing protagonist's voice output to japanese.
+kawaii
-overly long monologues