Ok.. There was another topic and we got a deal for a Torchlight II each of for a $15.

As for now there are some suggestions to buy 4-packs.
Standart price for a Torchlight II is $19.99, but buying 4-pack it is $59.99.
Standart price in Russia for this game is about $14.50. 4-pack is about $43.50.

Thus each 3 people who wants to purchase Torchlight II for $15 would get a copy. And one more copy would go as a giveaway here at SteamGifts.com.

So we are looking for a persons who want a Torchlight II for a $15. Please leave a message here.
P.S. Payments via Paypal.

1 decade ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

You again?

He was already outed by Yatterman as a person trying to make a profit out of buying Russian 4packs. More about that on his previous thread

I'll quote Yatter for the lazy dudes:

"So who's going to be buying the 4-pack in each situation? Because if you are buying it, you are charging US prices, not Russian prices.

Torchlight 2 for example would be $11 per person, not $15 per person.

Worms would be $5.75 per person.

Tower Wars would be $3.75 per person.

Shoot Many Robots would be $6.25 per person.

Sounds like you are just trying to steal peoples money who aren't paying attention to the fact that you are Russian.
"

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for the information. I'm sure this post will help out a lot of the Steamgifts newbies here. People like the OP should be ashamed of themselves for trying to profit off of 4-Packs and people who are unaware.

+1

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I actually think Yatterman got the wrong end of the stick there, though it's still a sham.

The idea is instead of 4 people buying a 4-pack, 3 people buy it and the price is split 3 ways, which is why it's still $15 and not $11.

The 4th copy of the game is then put as a giveaway here, by him, so he can earn contributor value for nothing basically.

Still seems dodgy, but not quite what Yatter said. From what he said, it looks as if he thought he was charging 4 people $15 each for the 4-pack and actually profiting in straight up cash, which I don't think is the case.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

What do you mean wrong end of the stick? Only the OP disagreed with what I had to say. He was basically making the 4th copy free for himself in his original thread.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Indeed, but your post looks as if you thought he was having 4 people buy the pack? And therefore he was taking profit purely in terms of money?

Rather than he was taking the copy and using it for contributor value profit instead, or maybe I just misread your post?

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No, I had it worded that he was having 3 people buy it in addition to him. You still need an initial buyer for the 4-pack in the first place and the person who buys it gets the game on their own account permanently and not a tradeable copy. In this new thread, he is now going to be putting the game on his own account unless someone else buys it which then again ruins the whole purpose of this.

TL;DR: In the end, he is either A) Making money B) Getting a free game for himself. Buying a 4 pack doesn't give you your own copy of the game to trade.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes, but reading this it looks as if he has 2 people buy it, as well as him, no?

Posted before you edited, yeah as Lunk said, it appears he has changed his method slightly. Agreed that either way he is profiting in some form though.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Still doesn't sound like it to me. It sounds like he's looking for 3 other people.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's what he's saying now, but is not what he was saying in his previous thread that the Yatterman quote was from. The quote was accurate, but the context has changed a bit with the new thread.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That'd make sense then, either way, still dodgy haha.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cheap move, should be suspended for that behavior.

1 decade ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 1 decade ago by inloved.