I just bought an RX 470 to replace my HD 7850 on my main PC. The old card will join another HD 7850 in CrossFire in the HTPC. I'd like to benchmark both machines before and after the upgrades. Any recommendations? I prefer free tools or ones that come with games. I tried running the built in benchmarking tools of Metro 2033 and Crysis 1, but both crash for some reason or another. I'm using Windows 10 64 bit, so this might have something to do with it. I tried 3DMark Basic Edition, but the included free test (Time Spy) seems way too challenging to my HD 7850 to be of any value (compared to actual games). Any other suggestions welcome!

Thanks!

Update: Thanks for all the suggestions. Here are the test results with my main PC (Windows 10 64 bit, Intel i7 4770K, 16 GB RAM, 1920x1080 screen resolution)

Test HD 7850 RX 470
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphic Test 1, FPS 22.2 56
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphic Test 2, FPS 20.6 49
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphic Score 4919 12018
3DMark Time Spy - Graphic Test 1, FPS 8.7 25.2
3DMark Time Spy - Graphic Test 2, FPS 7 20.5
3DMark Time Spy - Graphic Score 1273 3700
Unigine Heaven 4, FPS (avg) 32 74.5
Unigine Heaven 4, FPS (min) 22 28
Unigine Heaven 4 Score 807 1876
FINAL FANTASY XIV, FPS 38.7 81.5
FINAL FANTASY XIV Score 4995 10750
  • Unigine Heaven 4 tested with Ultra quality, 2xAA, Moderate Tessellation.
  • FINAL FANTASY XIV tested with Heavensward Benchmark, set to High (Desktop) and full screen.
View attached image.
7 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

i use 3dmark personally. i think the version you download from futuremark is free, the version on steam is a different version (I think advanced edition)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The demo on steam is the same as the basic version. (Not a real demo.)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ahh okay, that's what it is =)

i own advanced edition from applying the steamkey that came with a motherboard purchase several years back. also bought 11 & advantage, but the better one still is the original.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I forgot to mention that I tried it, but the included free test (Time Spy) seems way too challenging to my HD 7850 to be of any value (compared to actual games).

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh damn, the full / advanced editions cloud gate or ice storm would be the ideal tests.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You should try the Fire Strike test.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

oh i do, i've ran all of them.. but not firestrike on the 7850 card.

edit: oh but yeah, the firestrike on the newer 470 just to see how it performs i agree ^^

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

mmh just thought about it, you could probably use the 3dmark 11 demo instead if you wanted. it's not as demanding as the time spy test.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfortunately 3DMark 11 Basic doesn't support testing with 1920x1080 resolution, only 1280x720, which makes it not very useful in my case. I guess back in 2011 FHD screens weren't that common...

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

tbh what resolution it's set at just to get a base score for comparing the diff shouldn't matter imo. it's not like you're actually playing anything to care about how it even looks while testing. just make sure the same settings on each test is all that really matters.

otherwise an in-game benchmark is your best bet.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

One of the most popular is 3DMark
Others I use sometimes are Furmark, OCCT, MSI Kombuster.

You might also interested in MSI Afterburner as it can overclock your card, adjust voltage, fan speed, monitor FPS, VRAM, clock speed, etc.

7 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

MSI Kombuster isn't really a benchmark, it's more of a burn test to check OC settings are stable.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I use sites (where you can input what card you have and what game you want to run) to compare cards.
A lot depends on the CPU and RAM too.

http://gpuboss.com/compare-gpus
there might be an equivilent one of this http://www.notebookcheck.net/Computer-Games-on-Laptop-Graphics-Cards.13849.0.html for pcs
as you can see you can enter specs and it benchmarks for you

I also have a FPS counter in games and I tweak settings at first, but quality is subject to how you play (for example I prefer running on high but I don't like things like motion blur).

7 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This isn't exactly like benchmarking my own setup, but still sounds interesting. Can you share links to those sites? Edit: Got it. Thanks!

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

unigine heaven is a good one too.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

3d mark and unigine heaven, game benchmarks (like gta V or Shadow of Mordor)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not worth benchmarking sadly :(

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

it's okay for just comparing systems like they want to do here, but i agree for comparing to the rest of the world like 3dmark wants you to do. just screenshot the scores and save screenshots instead of even bothering to submit the scores.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

No I mean my GPU is not worth benchmarking. I know most recent games run bad on it, I don't need a benchmark to see that.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ahh, i gotcha. thought you meant with their rig they won't score very high in comparison to row scores. those scores are insane no matter how new you system is just from extreme overclocks (liquid nitrogen for example).

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yeah I know that people overclock their hardware extremely just to get a high score in benchmarks.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

super pi

try occt to burn all pc

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

that's cpu burn-in not gpu benchmarking ;)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I really like FFXIV Benchmarks. :) There has been 3 so far, you can get the latest one from the official website. It's surprisingly convenient for benchmarking as it shows the real-time graph of both your current performance as well as your Best / Previous / Specific score file.
Forgot to mention it's also very pretty, of course, has nice music and 5.1 sound.

7 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Really nice benchmark with excellent configuration. The only thing I couldn't find is info about minimum framerate. Do you know if it's captured anywhere?

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Glad you liked it. :) The ending summary only shows the average framerate, but it saves the entire framerate flow data for a particular test in one of the .dat files stored in the "data" folder (used to build the comparison graph). Sadly, I don't know of any custom result browsers able to display those graphs outside of the benchmark itself.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Maybe try FurMark?

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think this test is more about stress testing (stability) than performance.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, this test uses the GPU 100 percent. As the rest of your system is the same, you do not need an overall benchmark with numbers as those are to compare the power of your system (incl. CPU and RAM) with those of others.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

7 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Like others have said, 3dmark is really good. I use the steam demo version regularly, it should give you access to Firestrike which is the benchmark made for dedicated GPUs

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The built-in benchmark of Arkham City to see how it runs when sabotaged by UE3, then the Resident Evil 6 benchmark tool (separate and free on Steam as well) to see how it runs on a semi-decently optimised game. If I had it, I probably used the latest Hitman as well. Or Doom 4(I have it thanks to a generous person, just haven't started it yet to see if they have a benchmark in the game or not).
I really don't like 3Dmark because it is an open secret that all video card manufacturers cheat on it by releasing drivers that run it better than a standard 3D application. This is also why cards are tested with real games and synthetics are there just for the pretty score.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Unfortunately I don't own any of these games, but I did run some of the other suggested benchmarks, so should have a good gauge of the overall improvement.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Good to know it's free, but a bit too late. I already tested and and replaced the video card. I think I have enough data now (see chart in the OP).

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

ahh, results look great ^^

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Valley is my choice for benchmark.
https://unigine.com/products/benchmarks/valley/

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

furmark is great

http://www.geeks3d.com/20160826/furmark-1-18-0-gpu-burner-opengl-benchmark/
(the download is the big yellow box )

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If anyone is interested, the OP is now updated with a chart about my main PC GPU upgrade... ;-)

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Out of curiosity, what model is your RX 470? (As a point of reference, your benchmark scores almost reach the numbers for my R9 290 [Sapphire Tri-X], which I find interesting).

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's the 4 GB Sapphire Nitro. Based on these benchmarks performance should be similar, no?

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sure thing. Just wanted to know the model, thanks.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

The trick is that the RX 470 reaches the levels of the 290 with less than half the power requirement and at a lower launching price.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I think that's typical when comparing a latest generation mid-market GPU with an older generation flagship.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Not when it is the last generation. Despite the numbering, the only difference between the R9 200 and 300 series was a slightly higher base clock; they were rebranded 200 cards in any other regards. The 400 series made quite a large jump.
Same with NVidia, the 1000 series almost doubled the performance of the 900 series. Granted, there they had it easier, as the old architecture was in production for waaaaaay too long.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Going from 28nm to 14/16nm certainly helped, but I was a bit underwhelmed by the current crop from AMD, to be honest. Interested in seeing what they can pull off with Vega but I'm keeping my expectations in check.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Last time I benchmark anything it was with Tomb Raider (2013) and Bioshock Infinite. Both have internal benchmarks.

7 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.