Men of SG: have you ever mistreated women?
Bait or not, I'm getting tired of seeing this shit literally everywhere. It couldn't get anymore counterproductive, but I guess most people making these posts just want to virtue signal so they don't even care how it effects the actual issue. If you want to alienate men from women's problem, this is the way to go. But then again, this might be what you're actually trying to achieve here, because then you could finally put your arms in the air and say "See? Men hate women, I told you so!"
After all, you people couldn't go a day without virtue signaling here and there - why on Earth would you want to have peace between the sexes?
Comment has been collapsed.
chang all the words women with men thin you will have a good post
Comment has been collapsed.
The jury's out on whether va3victis meant this seriously or ironically, but it's safe to assume the original author, Nicole Silverberg, was serious, and that's too bad, because although all or most of these "tips" are technically correct (and one would in fact hope that most people follow, understand, and/or subscribe to most of them intrinsically, on the basis of respecting people in general), the way of putting them here is really cringeworthy, especially the particular way she expresses them. And it's this kind of zealous way of expressing otherwise normal things that gives feminism a bad rap and alienates people (mostly men) from it. It's just... agh. Jeez. You can feel the author, in the tone this list is dripping with, very actively targeting you, the reader, and implicating you in the guilt of the things she is railing against here. That doesn't help anybody. There are men who do need to see things like this, though. But who knows if they would actually take these "ideas" constructively; with how confrontational the tone, again, of this list is, it's unlikely. What this accomplishes more than anything is for the author to let off some steam and for some like-minded readers to echo her self-righteous satisfaction with cries of, "Preach, girl!"
Hopefully, this doesn't contribute to a negative perception of feminism for people. Because this isn't a good or complete representation of it. I like to form an opinion of a thing based on the best of it, expressed by the more intelligent and eloquent people advocating it, rather than based on the worst, expressed by the loud and ignorant.
(Edit: Upon going back and looking at the first page, it looks like va3victis was indeed trolling, etc.)
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
So, pretty much you just want us men to live far, far away from women, on a spereate country and they live in theirs where we live without them and they without us so that we dont even take any risks to treat them as special little snowflakes. Gotta hate threads like this.
Comment has been collapsed.
(If a woman says no to a date, don’t ask her again.) If this was the case for men that ask women out and also women that ask men out. A lot of us would not be married.There is no, not interested which settles that but, there is no for other reasons. Like ask me later, ending a relationship or, it could even just be bad timing. Maybe consider why first.
Comment has been collapsed.
I respect every person regardless of gender as long as they deserve it or earn it.
Gender has nothing to do with being an asshole, everyone is capable of acting like one.
Comment has been collapsed.
Nope fuck you (though it's probably a troll so much it's egregious). I've been abused by a woman when I was young, and then after by my mother, and as a man I could never even consider talking or complaining not because of other men but other women. So why should men be apologising for things that either they didn't do or don't matter (so everything that is not actual physical violence, rape or sexual assault)?
Feminism is clearly a movement against equality, in fact it's a mysoginistic movement at the extreme opposite of original feminism: they don't want women to be considered as equal human, but as de-facto victims, deresponsibilised from anything, who therefor should have special treatment...nope I'm sorry but I'm an egalitarisy so I'm going to consider you equal with no more pity or sympathy than I do for men.
Comment has been collapsed.
I generally don't have friends who tend to be "kind of a creep" at work, not that I'm aware of at least (if I was aware, chances are this person wouldn't be my friend).
This should apply no matter what gender the person does or doesn't have.
"something"...?
...most women I know are fully capable of doing that themselves but yeah, if I notice that someone is trying to say something but keeps getting pushed down I do tend to try to acknowledge them...chances are they have something interesting to add. This has nothing to do with gender though, people who tend to talk over others do it to everyone.
If your room requires reading, you better have poetic wallpapers or you're doing something wrong.
Because the professional term is "antisocial personality disorder".
Basically, don't trust people who are actually trying to get you to trust them..if they have to try, then something is fishy about their intentions.
Don't touch people you don't know.
What does this mean? Everyone deserves to be treated with at least some basic respect..by default, that's not something you can owe someone. What you can owe someone who you haven't treated with respect would be maybe an apology.
I wouldn't send one even if she did ask for it...what's wrong with you people?
What? Why not? Women aren't allowed to change their minds?
I have a hard time imagining being in a situation where sex is imminent but where the enthusiasm about it would somehow be in doubt.
I don't find really drunk women attractive but the opposite happens...I tend to not give my "consent" in those situations.
If you're doing something expecting a reward of some kind, it'd better be your job or some kind of agreement or you're likely trying to manipulate people into liking you.
Fuck no. Seriously, no fucking way. I don't allow anyone else to touch my creative projects.
...unless they're funny. (the trick is knowing when a joke actually is funny..to others, not just to yourself..and wont be taken as something offensive).
This list was not written by a man because all men, who are still alive, know very well to not expect anything less than all women to be homicidal mani...people with antisocial personality disorders. (also, see previous points).
Of course not?
For the same job, assuming they all have the required qualifications..of course. Don't pay anyone more or less because of their gender alone though (unless gender is somehow actually critical to the task but then why are you hiring someone of the wrong gender to begin with?).
Wait, what? What's the point of telling anyone they fucked up if they then just up and go away? The whole point of telling someone they fucked up is to let them know they're doing it wrong so they can avoid doing it and/or start over and do it right? But yeah, don't ever take critique personally because more often than not it has nothing to do with you as a person.
This needs a context for it to make sense, at least to me.
This is the same thing as the not taking shit personally point above.
..again, context. Not sure what kind of people the person who wrote this is used to talking to.
or men's...
...use it to protect people who can't protect themselves. Don't assume a woman needs or wants your protection just because she's a woman, that would be sexist af.
I don't know people who are thinking like that, most people I see doing this are women doing it to other women who aren't agreeing with them about some issue or other.
..which obviously goes for everyone, don't make your pain my problem unless you're invited to (edit: or if it's somehow my fault but this should be obvious).
....or that it only applies to men, women, neither, both, other or whatever the fuck you identify as.
Comment has been collapsed.
What the heck did I just read? It looks like some sort of preaching for a religion. Anyway, some phrases are just too funny :).
Comment has been collapsed.
"Common sense" is worthless: it's just whatever people in your time and place commonly view as acceptable. But that obviously can't be trusted (see: all of history). The whole point of being responsible for your actions is that you have the ability (and the obligation) to think about whether commonly accepted practices are justified. Just winging it and relying on so-called "common sense" isn't good enough, and using "common sense" instead of seeking explicit, principled reasons for your positions is an open invitation to let your biases affect your judgments and actions at every level.
Comment has been collapsed.
393 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by TheGreenBox
2,984 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by MeguminShiro
17,150 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by schmetti
531 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by DVDVD
21 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by TheBussines
66 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by schmetti
227 Comments - Last post 17 hours ago by spodamayn
10,897 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Gamy7
131 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by DudeNukem
161 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by f300
74 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by f300
17 Comments - Last post 35 minutes ago by Skwerm
312 Comments - Last post 40 minutes ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
30,546 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by afa1425
Comment has been collapsed.