275 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by RainTheGame
556 Comments - Last post 3 minutes ago by Leon30670
1 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Zarddin
1,235 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by RobbyRatpoison
3 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by ShannonA81
7 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by caesar239
17,077 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by InSpec
30,361 Comments - Last post 43 seconds ago by gzzhhg
68 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Ignition365
45 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Dunther
6,890 Comments - Last post 27 minutes ago by Oppenh4imer
4,123 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by KPopPoyehavshiy
7 Comments - Last post 39 minutes ago by wEbAddEr
129 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by erom96
I think it would be a more accurate representation over time to have the "Y" axis be CV itself perhaps with additional notation to show the levels at the same time, rather than the discrete levels themselves. Because the levels are closer to an exponential scale, there is very little change shown as the user levels, even for rather significant additions to the contributor value. This of course would be a small change on the whole, and admittedly, few people would benefit, but I think it would be a nice improvement, if there is the time and ability to do so.
Comment has been collapsed.