No. Maybe if you used the magical search bar, you'd see this is the fourth time this minute someone opened this thread and that the opinion of the majority of users and the staff is that, until someone actually comes up with a system that isn't entirely stupid, 300P is good. The problems you raise are not as big an issue as people keep thinking they are. If you're not happy with the level of discussion in this thread, maybe you should have closed it before the flames got too hot for you. I'm closing it now.
Comment has been collapsed.
35 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by AnthonyYo
31 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Gamy7
60 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by icaio
234 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by vlbastos
36 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by mayito
795 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by rongey420
8 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Velandur
26,941 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Quon
93 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by xurc
2 Comments - Last post 17 minutes ago by antidaz
2,547 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by juansebastian28
7 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Delisper
116 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeliberateTaco
402 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Markox21
There, I said it. I know a lot of you don't agree.
I think people have too many points, and are entering giveaways of games which they are not even interested in. Thus, this results in a lot of redundant entries everywhere, reducing the winning chance of those few who only enter games that they really want to play.
This is especially true ever since contributor value was introduced, increasing the number of giveaways on the site as well as point regeneration.
I don't know, I just think people want to win for the sake of winning now. Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins.
Honestly 180-200P is just about enough if you ask me.
Edit: Haha, so much for a civil discussion eh? Yall have a good day too.
Comment has been collapsed.