No. Maybe if you used the magical search bar, you'd see this is the fourth time this minute someone opened this thread and that the opinion of the majority of users and the staff is that, until someone actually comes up with a system that isn't entirely stupid, 300P is good. The problems you raise are not as big an issue as people keep thinking they are. If you're not happy with the level of discussion in this thread, maybe you should have closed it before the flames got too hot for you. I'm closing it now.
Comment has been collapsed.
218 Comments - Last post 53 seconds ago by pampuch721
17,045 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by DrR0Ck
404 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by DeliberateTaco
61 Comments - Last post 48 minutes ago by jiggakills
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by AgainstAllOdds84
267 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Darival
11 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by pb1
466 Comments - Last post 7 seconds ago by Aldcoran
13 Comments - Last post 8 seconds ago by Kougar7
9 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by MadmanTheMad
72 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Mostack
125 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by pizzahut
1,690 Comments - Last post 29 minutes ago by jiggakills
86 Comments - Last post 38 minutes ago by jacoz26
There, I said it. I know a lot of you don't agree.
I think people have too many points, and are entering giveaways of games which they are not even interested in. Thus, this results in a lot of redundant entries everywhere, reducing the winning chance of those few who only enter games that they really want to play.
This is especially true ever since contributor value was introduced, increasing the number of giveaways on the site as well as point regeneration.
I don't know, I just think people want to win for the sake of winning now. Not forgetting those who even regift/trade their wins.
Honestly 180-200P is just about enough if you ask me.
Edit: Haha, so much for a civil discussion eh? Yall have a good day too.
Comment has been collapsed.