gtx1050ti is almost beating rx470, and 480 is not so efficient also.(
Comment has been collapsed.
idk if you know but 15-20 fps of 60-110 fps is fuking a lots
performance per watt
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 8.4
Radeon RX 480 8.9
so rx 480 is less power hungry than the 1050ti, so i seriously don't understand your point
Bitcoin mining
Radeon RX 470
494.55 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
326.38 mHash/s
Face detection
Radeon RX 470
111.59 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
94.59 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation
Radeon RX 470
1,862.86 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
1,136.83 frames/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
Radeon RX 470
3,359.1
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
3,352.2
Fire Strike Factor
Radeon RX 470
65.08
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
51.6
Sky Diver Factor
Radeon RX 470
367.8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
335.39
Battlefield 4
Radeon RX 470
77
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
66
Crysis 3
Radeon RX 470
48.9
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
35.8
and now 480 vs 1050ti
Bitcoin mining
Radeon RX 480
608.32 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
326.38 mHash/s
Face detection
Radeon RX 480
120.17 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
94.59 mPixels/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
Radeon RX 480
3,356.26
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
3,352.2
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0)
Radeon RX 480
3,717.86
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
3,704.39
Fire Strike Factor
Radeon RX 480
75.65
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
51.6
Sky Diver Factor
Radeon RX 480
413.57
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
335.39
Battlefield 4
Radeon RX 480
82
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
66
Bioshock Infinite
Radeon RX 480
110
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
75.9
Comment has been collapsed.
All of the new Ryzen CPUs from AMD are very power efficient if that's what you're looking for. the R7 1700 is only 65W.
Comment has been collapsed.
You'll be able to scrimp by on the CPU by going AMD, especially if Ryzen is impressive in real world benchmarks and testing, but sorry, you're stuck with Nvidia for sure if you want a competent GPU that is also very power efficient.
I doubt Vega will be much more efficient than their current lineups, if anything it might be more power hungry relative to performance. You'll likely have to wait another AMD generation for efficiency, if that.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sadly APU have big TDP and not good efficient. Even R7250 will be alot better.
Comment has been collapsed.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-hierarchy,4312.html
On THE CPU Ryzen is not up but it seems like it will be better than any made from Intel till date so
Comment has been collapsed.
a ryzen with the RX470 or RX480 would do it, prob late this year the RX500 series will be launched.
Comment has been collapsed.
Ryzen is imminent and new AMD graphics cards are being previewed... today. Wait and see :)
Comment has been collapsed.
1 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by lostsoul67
71 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by lostsoul67
76 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Reidor
765 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by grimfandango8888
43 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Qnemes
12 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by orono
17 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by SeaGoblin
123 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Naviis
160 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by lordmonty3
34 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by devonrv
46 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Shanti
2,171 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by Flygonite
78 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeliberateTaco
45 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Yamaraus
All we know what Intel and nVidia chips give us more fps per watt (if overwievers are not cheating:-), and some times alot more then their red competitors. But is it so bad how it looks like?
It's topic only about AMD chips, so Intel and nVidia fans please passing by. Thank you.
So main question is - what AMD CPU and GPU from nowdays and a little bit old (2-3years) can be used in power efficient gaming PC to save some costs and allow to play modern games at least @ high/medium settings on Full HD (1920x1080) and less monitors?
I think it must be 4-core CPU and some not high-end videocard, so basically budget home PC for 12 hours working and 5-6 hours playing.
Lowest idle power consumption is important also.
Comment has been collapsed.