https://gogobundle.com/latest/bundles/bundlelimited-25

$0.99 per bundle (if you buy x1)
$0.75 per bundle (if you buy x2)
$0.60 per bundle (if you buy x5)
$0.50 per bundle (if you buy x10)
$0.40 per bundle (if you buy x20)
$0.30 per bundle (if you buy x50)

Game Ratings Cards Bundled Retail Price
Gravity puzzles - - 0 ?
JUMP STOP - - ? ?
Johnny Graves—The Unchosen One - - 4 $4.99
TangramsVR - - 1 $3.99
johnsgame - - 4 $1.99
Space Chaos - - 2 $0.99
Pixel War - 🂡 1 $0.99
NeonGalaxy Wars - 🂡 1 $0.99
Business clicker - - 0 ?

Retail:

  • $13.94

CV:

  • 2.0910

Chart created with Lex's SG Chart Maker

6 years ago

Comment has been collapsed.

Group buy

View Results
not this time
yeah why not

None of Pixel War, NeonGalaxy Wars drops cards.
According to the bundle page, the price for Business clicker is: $0.99
According to the bundle page, the price for Gravity puzzles is: $0.99
Your Jump Stop row needs manual fixing.
After that, your Retail / CV must be recalculated.

6 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

And your attitude needs to be adjusted :D

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

thats why i dont even read his/her comments :)

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm starting to agree with Mully here. This bundle thread mafia BS is fucking ridiculous :D

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sundance had too many alcopops last night and woke up in let's pick fights with everyone mode. Jeez.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

and thats why you are on my blacklist
disinformation and crappy threads

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So you think that charts should remain incomplete and provide wrong information?

I don't care about who makes a thread as long as everything in the thread is correct. But siwy, as he mentioned below, doesn't even care to fix his charts, and that's the only real thing that bothers me.

6 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's not about the content it's about the way you interact with other people which is frankly unacceptable.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Providing all the information that one needs in order to fix his chart is unacceptable?

But in your opinion it is acceptable to always do a quick and dirty chart / thread and not even care about fixing it?
It is acceptable to provide wrong information in the chart by not even linking to the right items? not even writing tier prices or calculating CV? (this happened in his past threads)

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Do what you want. I'm done with this matter.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Other than her unfortunate use of "you must" (edit: which appears to have been a mistake of phrasing which was rather rapidly corrected), all she did was provide a list of errors. Had someone provided that to me, I'd have been grateful. Which is to say, whether her intent was positive or not, the negative interpretation wasn't an inherent one.

As Shakti noted, "Providing all the information that one needs in order to fix his chart is unacceptable?"- she did something beneficial, for which she shouldn't have been criticized, regardless of what her intent may have been. Past that, a more constructive response would have been to been to politely note how rude her phrasing was coming across to you.

The fact is, your interpretation is plausible, based off my tags for Shakti indicating her being a bit overzealous on the topic at times. But as far this particular interaction goes, Shakti hasn't thus far provided any clear negativity by which to warrant your own responses. Regardless of the details of whatever outside politics and drama you're referencing, Shakti does put a lot of work in for us. If part of that involves us having to help her moderate her devotion to the topic, then that feels like something we can reasonably offer her in return for her efforts.

Besides, we can't afford to be hostile to one another this time of year, y'know? I mean, tis' the season!
..the season to unite together to defend our precious baked desserts from gluttonous home invaders! :|

View attached image.
6 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As I said my objection wasn't based on the suggestions she provided but rather on the way she did provide them and has been providing them in the past.

You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Would that line not go both ways, however?
Regardless, next time you may want to point out precisely what elements are troubling, so that Shakti can know what she can change if she feels a compulsion to do such. It's also worth noting that for all that her enthusiasm and tone can at times come across as rudely emphatic when she's providing information to others, the flip side of that is that I haven't seen her respond with anything but positivity and agreeability to constructive input directed at her own deal thread information. In other words, it really does just seem to be a thorough display of enthusiasm (combined, perhaps, with the kind of phrasing mistakes that we all make at times), rather than anything intended to be rude. As such, we should be able to work on the matter civilly and respectfully, rather than running off yet another bundle thread caretaker with unnecessary stress.

Also, a bit of a curiosity to consider- while each of your comments was directed toward Shakti directly, each of hers was primarily focused on the thread formatting itself. She truly does just give the indication of being that devoted to her sense of propriety, rather than ever intending any negativity herself. Given my own tendency to fixate on things, I can't help but appreciate just how misunderstood her perspectives may in fact be.

Finally, consider this: If she didn't provide the information, someone else likely would have criticized the OP for misleading info, and perhaps more rudely. Meanwhile, the OP provided just enough information that she couldn't warrant a thread remake, without drawing criticism from that. While her phrasing may have needed additional consideration (which she appears to have given it rather quickly after posting, making her initial arrangement little different from a typo), her approach was nevertheless one of the least dramatic ways of getting the information out, regardless of how it turned out. Put another way, if she got criticism from this approach, she'd have likely gotten worse criticism from any other approach- with the possible exception being if she'd said nothing at all (but given that by this point she no doubt feels responsibility for such topics, it'd be unreasonable for us to ask her to switch off her focus on it so casually).

Perhaps my impressions are mistaken, but perhaps that in itself indicates there is reason enough for us to withhold calling her out in the future unless she has actually done something at that moment which warrants the calling out. Right now, all such responses do is muddle up things for no good cause.


edit:
On a side-note:
Cromulent means something which is likely (grammatically) illegitimate, but presents itself in a way that seems as though it could be legitimate. It's used primarily for extensions of grammar which don't have commonplace usage, as a way of indicating that regardless of what common grammar rules suggest is appropriate phrasing for the matter, the deviation of phrasing makes a logical sense (based on broader grammar considerations). As such, using 'mooses', 'sheeps', or 'animes' as the plural of 'moose', 'sheep', or 'anime' (all of which normally serve as their own plural form) would be an example of cromulent word usage.

6 years ago*
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I guess my criticism could have been phrased more constructively but there will be no next time because the next time I'll simply not point it out.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Other than her unfortunate use of "must", all she did was provide a list of errors.

It's rather obviously implied that the prices must be recalculated to be correct so I wouldn't exactly deem it an unfortunate use. I'd say it's perfectly cromulent use of the word in these circumstances :P

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 years ago.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 2 months ago.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

249x168px gif is wrong, it should be at least 480x260.
you also forgot to put a flavor text in it [WRITE-HERE-WITHOUT-SPACES](URL)
text smilies aren't allowed, use emoji instead 😢

that's all! :O

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I like how you provided corrections 10 minutes after post time, and yet 1 day and a controversy later the chart still isn't fixed :s

Apparently there are 2 sides to these bundle threads. One is to be helpful and informative. The other one is to be the proud owner of as many bundle threads as possible. I don't mind the latter, but only if it doesn't harm the former. Which is obviously not the case here, with a rushed and never corrected table.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Deleted

This comment was deleted 5 years ago.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Missed out on this group buy so I'll host another
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/groupbuys/discussions/0/1620599015879391097/

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cheers for the charts siwy. Another no go bundle i'm afraid.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Thank you for posting, Siwy. :-)

I was missing 3 games that I can now play at my own leisure. ^^

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

All the "?" are unreleased games yet ?
Can we activate them before released ?

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Yes. Usually yes (didn't buy this bundle, but worked with other bundled unreleased games as well).

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You can activate anything that contains apps/depots you don't already own, and you can play anything that is released in your region or where your package granting it has a release state override set :>

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Will the chart be updated later with the info for the missing bits? - not a problem if not, I can look it up :) - but if it is just a matter of waiting :) then I shall

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Going to pass on this one.

THANK YOU for the chart and the time and effort you put into it, though, Siwy.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

go go bundle really wants me to +1 with trash...

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

TangrasmVR doesn't give CV.

6 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Sign in through Steam to add a comment.