Pokemon franchise is exactly like CoD (and began to propose the same structure over and over again way early than CoD). Deal with it, pokemon fans.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's also the same game rehashed over and over. It's exclusive to the Gameboy and DS. The originals wasn't balanced well in terms of power and types; this is something that has never been corrected. New generations are increasingly unimaginative. They're really time consuming too. Plus you're suppose to catch them all, which requires multiple games to get every Pokemon or friends willing to help. I'm pretty critical of Pokemon, which is very unfavorable amongst everyone.
It got kids and was charming. It was on the go, had the anime, trading cards, and tons of merchandise. I don't think of them as good games.
Comment has been collapsed.
They corrected the balance of typing with the introduction of Steel and Dark (Because the only thing Psychic was weak against was Bug, and if I remember correctly, there was literally no bug type move that did damage. Like how back in gen 1, the only Dragon Move was Dragon Rage). I thikn the newer generations are MORE imaginative, because let's be honest, a Bee and a Butterfly aren't that creative. Although I do agree that they are pretty damn ugly, the newer Pokemon. And the trading aspect of Pokemon has always been it's trademark. It basically brought the Link Cable onto the market.
Comment has been collapsed.
Leech Life, Pin Missile, String Shot and Twineedle were Bug type moves in Gen 1. To extend on your Dragon Rage comment, it was the only Dragon type move in Gen 1 and never showed that Dragons are weak against Dragons due to the fact it does a fixed 40 damage every time.
Comment has been collapsed.
"New generations are increasingly unimaginative."
Did you even look at G1's Pokémon? Seriously.
Comment has been collapsed.
eh its sort of a yearly franchise but platinum, blk2/wht2, and hearth ans souls were just slightly changed versions of other games so not as much needed to be done on them. platinum and bl2/wht were almost just dlc
Comment has been collapsed.
Haven't played B2/W2. How are they different games?
Comment has been collapsed.
they were kind of different but honestly i found it too similar to finish especially with unova being the worst region up to that point
Comment has been collapsed.
Pokémon's slowly been changing, and it seems to be changing faster than, to use your example, CoD. For a start, it's being directed to adults more than CoD is. ;) Anyway, this generation swapped things up quite a bit. I view HG/SS as a side project as a remake, though I haven't played them much, so I could be wrong, whereas the next one was B/W, which is a two year gap. There were actually two years between B/W and B2/W2 (go by Japanese release dates, not the wildly varying international dates) and it's not unbelievable to think that X/Y had a mostly separate team, given the 3DSness of it. I'll admit, yeah, I was surprised it was announced so quickly, but I'm not seeing a worrying trend myself. The big issue with yearly releases is franchise burn, something CoD in particular suffers as it's one of many modern FPSes. Pokémon is pretty much unique, as far as I know, so while franchise burn can and probably has happened for some people, it's still taking its time for many, many others.
Japanese release schedule:
Diamond/Pearl: September 28, 2006
Platinum: September 13, 2008
Heart Gold/Soul Silver: September 12, 2009
Black/White: September 18, 2010
Black 2/White 2: June 23, 2012
X/Y: October 12, 2013
Comment has been collapsed.
JP schedule is more accurate in terms of development time though. With your dates, it makes it look like B2/W2 were in development for, at most, a year. That's untrue. They were just less delayed internationally than the originals and X/Y had a global release. If it was normal, it would probably be 2014 at least when we saw it, throwing your yearly release statement off. Hence, go for the first release, not when other people got it.
Comment has been collapsed.
"Liked as in by basically every gamer, so obviously CoD doesn't count."
I wouldn't be surprised if CoD is more liked by people globally than Pokemon. "Bro's" are less likely to be vocal about their devotion on online message boards than more nerdy-type Pokemon lovers.
Comment has been collapsed.
Wow, I never realized.
Yay for assets!
Assets!
Assets!
Comment has been collapsed.
167 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
725 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by leecee
1,951 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by diehard
148 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by jiggakills
13 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by yush88
9 Comments - Last post 4 hours ago by yush88
5 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by yush88
376 Comments - Last post 24 seconds ago by aez76
208 Comments - Last post 27 seconds ago by Ryndynhox
220 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by aez76
40 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by lav29
2,089 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by GlutenTag
466 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Vampus
28,464 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by Dominicanoed
As the title asks, am I the only one who realized that the Pokemon games are becoming yearly releases, which almost every gamer complains about? We always complain about series with sequels every year, and then here is Pokemon, making a main release every March/October (They seem to have switched from March to October). And that excludes the spin-offs.
Now, I'm not criticizing this. I mean, I love the Pokemon franchise. Granted, I'm not a fan of really any of their games after B2/W2, and I don't have a 3DS anyways, but the franchise as a whole is one I love. I'm just pointing out how ironic it is that we complain about yearly releases, and yet Pokemon is probably the biggest culprit of this, and we don't notice it. Any other series you could think of that release at least 1 game a year and are still as liked as Pokemon? Liked as in by basically every gamer, so obviously CoD doesn't count.
EDIT: Here's a timeline.
Comment has been collapsed.