As the title asks, am I the only one who realized that the Pokemon games are becoming yearly releases, which almost every gamer complains about? We always complain about series with sequels every year, and then here is Pokemon, making a main release every March/October (They seem to have switched from March to October). And that excludes the spin-offs.

Now, I'm not criticizing this. I mean, I love the Pokemon franchise. Granted, I'm not a fan of really any of their games after B2/W2, and I don't have a 3DS anyways, but the franchise as a whole is one I love. I'm just pointing out how ironic it is that we complain about yearly releases, and yet Pokemon is probably the biggest culprit of this, and we don't notice it. Any other series you could think of that release at least 1 game a year and are still as liked as Pokemon? Liked as in by basically every gamer, so obviously CoD doesn't count.

EDIT: Here's a timeline.

  • Pokemon Diamond/Pearl: 2007
  • Pokemon Platinum: 2009
  • Pokemon Heart Gold/Soul Silver: 2010
  • Pokemon Black/White: 2011
  • Pokemon Black 2/White 2: 2012
  • Pokemon X/Y: 2013
11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

Pokemon franchise is exactly like CoD (and began to propose the same structure over and over again way early than CoD). Deal with it, pokemon fans.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

*Began

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Ty.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

This reminds me of that one South Park episode for some reason.

This one

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That was my first South Park episode. <3

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Nice. Mine was the one where they become wrestlers.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

IT'S NOT GAY

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's also the same game rehashed over and over. It's exclusive to the Gameboy and DS. The originals wasn't balanced well in terms of power and types; this is something that has never been corrected. New generations are increasingly unimaginative. They're really time consuming too. Plus you're suppose to catch them all, which requires multiple games to get every Pokemon or friends willing to help. I'm pretty critical of Pokemon, which is very unfavorable amongst everyone.

It got kids and was charming. It was on the go, had the anime, trading cards, and tons of merchandise. I don't think of them as good games.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

They corrected the balance of typing with the introduction of Steel and Dark (Because the only thing Psychic was weak against was Bug, and if I remember correctly, there was literally no bug type move that did damage. Like how back in gen 1, the only Dragon Move was Dragon Rage). I thikn the newer generations are MORE imaginative, because let's be honest, a Bee and a Butterfly aren't that creative. Although I do agree that they are pretty damn ugly, the newer Pokemon. And the trading aspect of Pokemon has always been it's trademark. It basically brought the Link Cable onto the market.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Leech Life, Pin Missile, String Shot and Twineedle were Bug type moves in Gen 1. To extend on your Dragon Rage comment, it was the only Dragon type move in Gen 1 and never showed that Dragons are weak against Dragons due to the fact it does a fixed 40 damage every time.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know Dragon Rage was a fixed 40 damage, which is why I mentioned it. Also, I forgot that Twineedle was a Gen 1 move

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"New generations are increasingly unimaginative."

Did you even look at G1's Pokémon? Seriously.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

eh its sort of a yearly franchise but platinum, blk2/wht2, and hearth ans souls were just slightly changed versions of other games so not as much needed to be done on them. platinum and bl2/wht were almost just dlc

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'd like to point out that B2/W2 are basically completely different games. And besides, shouldn't the fact that those games were "slightly changed" and "almost just dlc" just prove the point of Pokemon being the biggest money suckers ever?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Haven't played B2/W2. How are they different games?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Completely new story. It is a direct sequel to B/W. New map, almost. Other than that, not much/

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Different leaders, different world layout, different Pokemon to find. (While B/W were basically exclusively Gen 5 Pokemon in the main game, B2/W2 mixes generations of wild Pokemon and enemy Pokemon from the start)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh, you meant different from B/W. I thought you meant B2 was vastly different from W2.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

they were kind of different but honestly i found it too similar to finish especially with unova being the worst region up to that point

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Oh, and my favorite Generation is Gen 2. So amazing. (2>4>5>1>3 in my opinion. Since I don't care about Gen 6 at all, I will refrain form adding it to the last and just put it off to the side)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pokémon's slowly been changing, and it seems to be changing faster than, to use your example, CoD. For a start, it's being directed to adults more than CoD is. ;) Anyway, this generation swapped things up quite a bit. I view HG/SS as a side project as a remake, though I haven't played them much, so I could be wrong, whereas the next one was B/W, which is a two year gap. There were actually two years between B/W and B2/W2 (go by Japanese release dates, not the wildly varying international dates) and it's not unbelievable to think that X/Y had a mostly separate team, given the 3DSness of it. I'll admit, yeah, I was surprised it was announced so quickly, but I'm not seeing a worrying trend myself. The big issue with yearly releases is franchise burn, something CoD in particular suffers as it's one of many modern FPSes. Pokémon is pretty much unique, as far as I know, so while franchise burn can and probably has happened for some people, it's still taking its time for many, many others.

Japanese release schedule:

Diamond/Pearl: September 28, 2006
Platinum: September 13, 2008
Heart Gold/Soul Silver: September 12, 2009
Black/White: September 18, 2010
Black 2/White 2: June 23, 2012
X/Y: October 12, 2013

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I know the Japanese Schedule was different. I'm going by the NA/EU one. The JP releases are slowing getting closer to the NA/ROW releases, but it used to be a 1-2 year gap between JP and ROW/NA releases

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

JP schedule is more accurate in terms of development time though. With your dates, it makes it look like B2/W2 were in development for, at most, a year. That's untrue. They were just less delayed internationally than the originals and X/Y had a global release. If it was normal, it would probably be 2014 at least when we saw it, throwing your yearly release statement off. Hence, go for the first release, not when other people got it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"Liked as in by basically every gamer, so obviously CoD doesn't count."
I wouldn't be surprised if CoD is more liked by people globally than Pokemon. "Bro's" are less likely to be vocal about their devotion on online message boards than more nerdy-type Pokemon lovers.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Pokemon died on me on Gold and Silver...

they are way too many Pokemon now...they're like Digimon.
most of them are of non-quality.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Wow, I never realized.
Yay for assets!
Assets!

Assets!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Its only like that because people burn through it like butter

And its more of a single player handheld game

I for one want Y, but i also want previous gens so i can bring older pokemon back as well.

I.E Rayquaza :3

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your a little late, I remember back in 2nd grade thinking pokemon was a rip off, because all they did was change city names and colors for each new release ( this is still the case)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by Bassnium.