if it promises to make them just 1$ more compared to now they are gonna try it. that's just the way it works.
and my wallet will say fuck you. that's just the way it works.
Comment has been collapsed.
If it tailors my rewards into drugs, I'm all for it.
Comment has been collapsed.
How about you dream about HL3?
That would do, honest.
Comment has been collapsed.
I think they already made a meta.
Not games as a service, but selling others' games, as a service. And worked out so well, they got lazy and comfy with it.
I'm not a fan of games as a service mode. I love a deep game, I love to work to get to somewhere, but this new notion is just MMO in a different coat. Grinding, repetition, new and new milestones, controlled progression, usually monetized through boosts ( I would love to see the WoW-like purchasable expansions, with upfront price and content), and I love games. I love new games with pixel graphics and roguelike elements, a FPS with a great story, a roleplaying game with worlds to save and explore, or a minimalist puzzle to relax with. I'm not happy about publishrers wanting to make games so huge =not being able to fill it with varied content, it's repetitive and/or requires grind) that I would need to live in it to kind of complete it. And I'm not even daring to say "them" because even one would take too much of my time :D
Comment has been collapsed.
I see.
In fact, did human beings abandon the body and become a player who enjoys the game and virtual reality with brains alone?
It is possible to create an EEG controller optimized for brain wave data storage and rewrite human firmware.
Of course it's a joke.
(。-Θ-。)ooO(Command & Conquer Red Alert 2?)
Comment has been collapsed.
I hate any internet or PC thing "as a service."
We got a very exciting email recently, stating that one piece of software we own was so old it was losing the software-as-a-service part (which we never used), and we would have to upgrade to continue having access to that part of it. Needless to say, we're glad it will finally just be regular software.
Comment has been collapsed.
Normally I'm against games as a service but after seeing the possibilities of Google Stadia it's something that could change my mind. Not having to worry about having a good PC or constantly upgrading your PC, just having a decent monitor, and you can play any and all games at high resolution. That is kinda cool. Depending on the pricing, if they charged a fair flat rate and you could play as many games as you want, that could be appealing.
Or maybe Steam and other platforms could partner with Stadia, you buy the games on Steam and use Stadia's service to play them. Future of gaming could be exciting, or it could be a disaster.
Comment has been collapsed.
Pretty sure they don't dream, that's their goal.
I think they introduced loot-boxes to paid PC games (in TF2 loot-boxes came few months before F2P model and I think it was first time on PC). They put microtransactions in Portal 2. They even went with the whole paid-mods workshop (and technically, all the hats, CSGO skins of Dota2 costumes are paid mods...), I read they now introduce official gambling to Dota2.
All of that won't work if the games are not services.
Comment has been collapsed.
they don't dream, that's their goal
this might be an answer, it's from article's comments, a popular one:
When it goes from
"We make a game for you to have fun."
to
"How can we empty your wallet?"
i personally see Valve as a comfy, kinda lazy company. often i get old-Microsoft vibes, from it. like, they're huge. plenty of money. so why "give you a more modern browser (IE) / a sleek modern client/platform (Steam) when, well, you really look like you don't need it?".
fact is, both didn't studied what was to be studied: the users. and they already had/have a lot, lot of data, so they're "comfy, lazy".
that's, mostly, why i think Valve is just "dreaming". they won't do any study/software/hardware for "physiological responses". the day Valve wants more money, like you've said, they -pretty surely- will have it. i usually don't care much about "privacy problems", still, reading the article i thought about more tangible realistic things, like marketing, gambling. a wallet. that sorta things :P
Comment has been collapsed.
I disagre that they didn't studied the users. They have like 10 million + users every month to study - TF2, Dota2, CSGO.
They have the stats how many people are investing into lootboxes, how many people invest into market, how many people don't invest at all, if 100 hours spend playing turns into $10 spend on keys or not.
Of course, the result of their studies might not be what we want to hear (for example, good MP-only game brings more money from lootboxes than greatest single-player game due to lack of lootboxes).
still, reading the article i thought about more tangible realistic things, like marketing, gambling. a wallet. that sorta things
I might misunderstand you, but Valve did just released official Dota 2 Gambling app - I especially love "age 3+).
Comment has been collapsed.
Comment has been collapsed.
25 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
10 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Hassat
724 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by ZPE
11 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wok
2,044 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by Wok
68 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by wigglenose
53 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by fauren
16 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by josgba2002
31 Comments - Last post 15 minutes ago by FrysandeKold
6,754 Comments - Last post 22 minutes ago by pizzahut
3 Comments - Last post 23 minutes ago by chairmankao
2 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by Lubiii
2,685 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by reyhan
213 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by omar777
full article at Ars Technica:
Valve Software dreams of analyzing your brainwaves to tailor in-game rewards
Valve Software's Mike Ambinder, at this year's Game Developers Conference:
plus this bit here (bold is mine):
and then:
Comment has been collapsed.