It has a repetitive sh*t gameplay with weak story and with outrageous price, why are you doing this people?:S just because it's popular, or what?

11 years ago*

Comment has been collapsed.

The game doesn't have to be good to be a hit.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i think saying cod is bad is almost as popular as cod.

they're good games. the MP has all the basic elements of a good-ish modern fps. I can't say I've poured a huge amount of time into it, but there are a lot of elements to like.

Your guns shoot where you aim,
the spray patterns are consistent and easy to memorize,
there is a constant stream of players so you never have to wait to play,
the maps are balanced enough,
the leveling gives incentive to keep playing,
the games are optimized to the point that they run smoothly,
and there is more skill involved than you think. It's just as easy to camp on csgo or battlefield or halo as it is on cod, and the bullshit "quickscoping" is console-exclusive.

And hating on the single player is just going full retard. The campaigns are written by accomplished screenwriters. The ending of BO1 blew your mind just as much as it did mine.

HOP OFF THE BANDWAGON OP AND STOP MAKING THIS THREAD

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

As someone that dislikes Call of Duty and modern shooters in general, Black Ops 1 did have an amazing campaign, that is true.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Generally the bandwagoners are the ones saying CoD is bad, what me and a lot of other people complain about is the lack of innovation in the series. Annual releases with nothing added to the game but a couple of maps that are often rehashes of old maps in a new environment and slightly different level design as well as a new gun circulation does not justify a full priced release.

They're not 'bad' per se, the playerbase is fucking horrible (because it's pre-pubescent) and the game is the exact bloody same every fucking year, and they're making ridiculous money on it which inspires other companies to do the same (ie. J-.. Ubisoft with the Assassin's Creed series) which kills the video games industry.

CoD is nothing but shitty business practice on an established consumer base, and because the consumer base is thirteen years old on median and blinded by fanboyism it's acceptable. It fucking shouldn't be.

Anyway, just go ahead and spend your annual $60+DLC on yet another remake of the exact same game, just don't get annoyed when people call you a mindless drone for doing so.
I'm aware that posting this rant may make me look like a PC gaming mustard race elitist cunt, but I'm going to take this risk and your negative view of me. I don't usually join into threads like this but when someone so poorly defends the series and calls everyone who says they dislike it a bandwagoner I have to.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

+1, and you deleted me for impersonating Roman :l.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You were being generally annoying for the most part and added me for no reason at all. I'm not going to derail this into an argument.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

K.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Annual releases with nothing added to the game but a couple of maps that are often rehashes of old maps in a new environment and slightly different level design as well as a new gun circulation does not justify a full priced release.

All of the maps are new game-to-game, not just a couple. I'm not sure what you're talking about with old maps in a new environment... The only example I can think of is Nuketown/2025 but that was a fan favorite map and it was heavily revamped. A new gun circulation is pretty significant, as well. You're also forgetting that almost every game is built on a new engine and that the treyarch games are very different from the infinity ward games. You start off pretending that each new cod game is an expansion, and more akin to dlc, and this is not the case. Keep in mind that each game comes with a 20+ hour campaign that simply can't be hated on.

They're not 'bad' per se, the playerbase is fucking horrible (because it's pre-pubescent) and the game is the exact bloody same every fucking year, and they're making ridiculous money on it which inspires other companies to do the same (ie. J-.. Ubisoft with the Assassin's Creed series) which kills the video games industry.

The xbox playerbase could be characterized as immature, but I don't think this is the case with the PC versions of the games. Also, you don't really have a valid point with ubisoft.. they have been rolling downhill for quite a while

CoD is nothing but shitty business practice on an established consumer base, and because the consumer base is thirteen years old on median and blinded by fanboyism it's acceptable. It fucking shouldn't be.

If I'm not mistaken, each game has outsold the last, so logic dictates that CoD has a growing fanbase, not an established clique of fanboys. Also, I'm not sure how a group (that you say is the same group) can be perpetually 13. If this group was 13 when the first modern warfare came out, they're 19-20 by now

Anyway, just go ahead and spend your annual $60+DLC on yet another remake of the exact same game, just don't get annoyed when people call you a mindless drone for doing so.

Who pays $60 for digital games ever? do you even steam? And if $60 a year (roughly the cost of two dinners) makes me a mindless drone for CoD you should get a load of what I spend on computer parts and auto parts yearly (most of which are rehashes of previous versions of the same parts).

I'm aware that posting this rant may make me look like a PC gaming mustard race elitist cunt, but I'm going to take this risk and your negative view of me.

.....are we not talking about the PC version?

I don't usually join into threads like this but when someone so poorly defends the series and calls everyone who says they dislike it a bandwagoner I have to.

right back at you

TL;DR we disagree but that's ok

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Look at BO2's maps and tell me how many of them are inspirational and/or well designed. A lot of them are based on simple covers on two ends of the map and plain blocks to stand behind while running to the other side of the map, or even worse, all of this in a clusterfuck in the middle of the map. They're not made with a new engine each; in fact, they've been using the same engine for years. The gun circulation doesn't fucking justify a full priced release. It's a good thing to do with each release, but actual improvement and innovation is required to be able to charge AAA prices for a bunch of fucking guns to shoot with.
People who bought CoD4 have mainly either moved on to better games (CoD4 was still decent, though, and at the time the playerbase was decently mature). The CoD playerbase is pretty much the same age by average on all platforms, don't try to blame XB360 for all of the issues CoD has.
They outsell eachother every year because more and more parents are recklessly buying their barely speech-capable children CoD games, hivemind/mainstream works in a snowball effect.
Only talking 'the PC version' is like only talking about the strings on a shoe.
It's ok to disagree with me, but be prepared to look like a moron if you're not going to elaborate and support your arguments, I love arguing.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I'm pretty sure I'm not the one looking like a moron here. Your posts are full of opinions, speculations, and anecdotes, and I'm pretty much only making statements that are objectively true. The link you provided only illustrates my point and directly contradicts the one you were making. There are 6 engines for 8 games, and your link even provides the changes made between each.

Your analogy is pretty far off when you say only talking PC is like only talking strings on a shoe. It's more like having 4 pizzas with different toppings and only talking about the one that you ate.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

New version != new engine. It's been the same modified engine since CoD4.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

...yes. a new version is a new engine. cryengine 3 is worlds apart from cryengine 1. At this point we're really splitting hairs.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

That's like saying every source game has its own engine.
It's just a modified version of the IW engine, and every modification makes a new version. The Cryengine is a completely new engine made from scratch every time, unlike the IW engine.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I still enjoy the cod single player, but its overpriced... i only buy cod series when i find them in very very cheap price, for example last week i did brought the cod bo2 for 8,60€ physical version xD
i never would pay more than 25€ for a cod game

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cuz Fishez!!!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because they like it, why? I don´t know, everyone have different tastes...

But I also think it´s a bit overpriced

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Buying Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare on Steam in my opinion is fine. It's community offers a great deal of mods which can be fun at time. Also, CoD:4 isn't a bad game to begin with. I wouldn't disrespect anyone who buys Call Of Duty: World at War either, for it offers dedicated servers which also leads to community based modifications etc. Speaking of which, CoD, CoD2 and CoD3 aren't bad games either. If anyone buys a CoD game after my list, it's either because they're expecting things to change, their friends have the game, they're kids or they just enjoy the shallow, purely bad gameplay and enjoy watching their money disappear.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Actually bo2 is my first COD , so i'm enjoying the multyplayer , but in my opinion Bf3>COD all the way i'm going to get the bf4

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well I quit a little after MW3 came out (playing since CoD2 off and on). I agree its repetitive but sometimes its fun to go back and play it a bit. I was thinking about getting Ghost just to play around a bit.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Cod fish is pretty good to eat

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because cod has more mass appeal than salmon, even though salmon is generally the better choice. Also, fish does not have gameplay. Each individual fish might have its own story, I suppose, but how do you know it's weak? Just because they have tiny brains and don't do much doesn't mean they can't have a good story.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

cause they like it... too bad for them but its not my problem :)

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because brainwaching machines force you to buy COD for bigger price. Still COD is OP everything is the same and will be the same

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Another cod thread another bunch of haters who dont have money to take both bf and cod{really this must be your problem. the reason that only kids play is not stable..just look league of legends statistics i dare you i double dare you}.So why people play cod the reason is simple for concoles is split screen and that you can easy create teams of 6 friends and play 6vs6{strangers} so you can say you can have some fun and battlefield you can too but not at all modes and low capacity servers is horrible such as only 8 players servers. i love only the 32 players servers so i cannot find 16 friends to play so when i want to play with my friends i play cod.Also guys plz stop hatting leave the players who want to play cod play their game and cod guys leave the players who want to play bf play bf.... what your problem what others playing

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i agree completely

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Difference between lol and cod is that lol doesn't charge its playerbase 60 bucks every year for the same game. But the playerbase is definitely equally bad.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

haha like cod makes you to spend 60 bucks to play the game.IF activision came with policemen and FBI and told you buy cod or you go to jail then i agree with you banana completly if not then delete your comment

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Re-read the comment, realize how stupid you are, delete your comment and spare yourself the embarrasement.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

nothing to be embarraded for.You must be embarassed who compare a f2p game with cod

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Funny you would bring that up when you were the one to mention lol in the first place.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i bring league of legends statistics up not the game.Statistics talks about playing time and other things no how much players spend and etc etc

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You are still comparing a f2p game to CoD.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

i am comparing the statistics not the games also i read all your posts and see what hater you are. all the fps you describe you make them better than cod and also you have play 30 minutes cod mw2 and sp 0 minutes how you can desribe a game withought playing it

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Clearly steam is the only way to play CoD and there's no way I could possibly own console versions of the games. I also don't need 2000 hours in a game to be able to notice how simple the mechanics are.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you dont need 2000 hours but you need to have play all the single player and at least some hours of mp you have play only 30 minutes of mp and not at all single player so you cannot critisize a game withought know nothing about it.In this situation you are the kid trapped in a grown up body not cod players.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

To tell the truth i abandoded the two last games of cods first because i read for university and secondly because i hated the smg gameplay style they were so op that i couldnt play but i never hated cod for these.Also i play bf,cod and moh whatever the critis or people said and the reason is simple if the game is crap is because commnutity make it crap when they start the hate and hacks etc etc.One year before i start the develop of a game with ready scripts with cryengine 3 with 10 others friends trust me was very hard to fix it without money.We reached in a state which we wanted 1000 euro just for the enviroment so we abandoded the project{this go replay for your 60 bucks thing}.so dont complain for the same crap every year

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Also plenty of users here are people who used hacks and got banned.I got banned at bo2 because i used trainers{no aimbots etc i hate them really}but i didnt stop to play the series not even mw2 so i am tired see people say the cod is the same crap.If it is the same crap why you buy games powered from unreal engine 3 games all has the same graphics the same enviroments only the story and the weapons change

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because it's fun

Anyway Battlefield doesn't have an outrageous price? Plus giving overpowered weapons and then getting banned after buying two map packs ($30) and a primum account ($60). Battlefield is complete garbage.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

why not?

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

idk man, I like tuna myself

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Me too :) I always open 4 of these when I don't want to make lunch/dinner and eat :P

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Tuna in tomato sauce is the food of the gods.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Why are action movies still popular? Couldn't we have just stopped at Die Hard decades ago?

CoD is popular for the same reason that Transformers is a popular movie series. You can turn your brain off and enjoy some explosions for a while.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It actually has really good and responsive controls, fast paced action and not waiting 15 minutes waiting for players.

Modern Warfare series was pretty good interactive action movie. I didn't like Black Ops campaigns.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

because it's the best game in the whole multiverse.
/thread

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because their friends bought it.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"It has a repetitive sh*t gameplay" - Sounds like Counter Strike..
P.S I dont play any of those games

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

:roflol: Counter-Strike is probably the most modded game ever, tons off different types of games in a game.
But for Counter-Strike you actually need skill. That's probably what you lacked.

Not a single game has keept me buzy as long as Counter-Strike did. Thousands of maps, many mods GG, RPG, Surf, ... and almost every server is unique. I prefer CSS.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

CS GO is great aswell, lots of mods there too.
Especially enjoying jailbreak.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I like CS GO less. I did try it for a while (not mods, only 'normal' / 'classic' mode and gotten into top 20 xD (already out a while now cuz haven't played it anymore for months). But I don't like the 'gungame'-like mode they made. Gungame how it was (mainly the maps) was so much better on CSS. (By now they probably have GG servers with those maps by now?) Might check it out again in the future.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

So does every other fps which doesn't have mod tools.
Oh wait Arma 3 and cs go has great mod support.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Well, different people, different choices, that's all there man, if you don't like COD that doesn't man someone else doesn't like it too :)

But well, i agree with you, the price is just too damn high :s but well, there are people who likes spending money on games, that they will actually never play :D

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Because cod is a great type of fish; yum yum!

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It might be a good game for kids, people new to shooters, people who have a lot of trouble to move their mouse onto a target, people with spasms, ...
For me as an adult it sucks hard. In Counter-Strike I needed skill to own.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

You want the truth guys you are all retards why to fight for a video game REALLY WHY.NOBODY MAKES YOU TO BUY THEM so all stfu and just play what you want and dont make threads like i hate cod i hate bf i hate {put whatever game you want} and start get a personal life ffs play what you love and leave what you dont love to be forgotten

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I hate COD.
Everybody should hate COD.
They don't give a damn about gamers nor do they care about others their entertainment.
They only care about selling as many copies as possible for as much as possible.
It's one of the most expensive games and also the most profitable. They're scamming the people by how much they ask for it, they could easily sell it for normal prices and probably wouldn't make less profit doing that. But it's a part of their marketing strategy. People seeing something beeing sold at a high price: "oh that must be very good" and they buy it. As a marketeer I'm disgusted by that. Using such a strategy for juwelry and stuff like that is OK, but for games that are supposed to be entertainment and sold to kids... No ethics. Garbage.

They're the iPhone of games but even crappier.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

I don't know where the hell you live, but where I live, we go for the LEAST expensive thing. More expensive things just turn me off of a product.

Also the DEV'S care about the gamers, (at least Treyarch), it's just the publisher that doesn't give a damn.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

People only go for the least expensive thing when they're all really the same.
What you've said now for example completely conflicts with my iPhone example. If what u said is true, why do so many people buy iPhone? Because I remember the time before iPhones people would already think of 200 € as a very expensive mobile phone.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

but i dont find the reason why so much hate when nobody makes us buy it dont buy it then you cannot say to someone dont buy it because you hate it and because you believe everybody must hate it

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

It's partially ethics and people feel like they're getting ripped off.
It's like the LA Noire thing I've mentioned somewhere on this forum. It was sold for 3,75 dollars (= € 2,8) in the US and for € 10 in Europe. I didn't buy it. Similar games to COD sell for less, COD doesn't (or almost doesn't) lower prices over time and most importantly they can absolutely sell it for cheaper / lower price and make the same amount of profit. But that last thing would be temporary, as the pricing is a huge part of their marketing strategy. If they sell at normal prices their fanbase would shrink quite a lot faster.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

also thing this they do their job this means they create a product which they have put effort and spend money{employees and other stuffs} so if you dont buy it this year dont buy it the next one the series will be cancelled.Am i right until now if yes keep read.Publisher have this game king of the hill at his yearly summerise of this incomes so no big incomes unability to pay employees means bankrupsy this means more unemployers.So everybody must hate cod is not correct the correct term is go dont buy it or wait to drop down his price this means plenty of people dont buy it and buy it in a correct price.Also there are various sites you can buy cod for 45 euros

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

you know that the real price of activision is not 60 bucks all over the internet said is 50 bucks just try to search why 10 more euros

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

If they sold COD cheaper even from release they'd still make plenty of money. COD tends to be already profitable after just one week of sales. The problems you mention are a worry for many games but not for COD. It's a cashcow, if u know what that means (BCG-matrix).

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

"but for games that are supposed to be entertainment and sold to kids"

jolly good marketeer you are when they are NOT designed for kids since they have a rating of 18+

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Who cares about rating? Probably 80-90% of all kids (that play games) have played games rated above their age.
I'm quite sure that 30% or more of all COD players are <18.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Your comment is kind of ironic.

11 years ago
Permalink

Comment has been collapsed.

Closed 11 years ago by viktor0110.