Should "bump" posts be replies to the OP or to some random comment in the thread?
Maybe reserve the first comment for bumps, then anyone who would like to simply bump could reply to the last bump, so everybody gets only one notification
Comment has been collapsed.
66 Comments - Last post 42 minutes ago by Axelflox
27 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by OneManArmyStar
380 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by VahidSlayerOfAll
8,466 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Warriot
15,384 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by PoeticKatana
110 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by pb1
1,160 Comments - Last post 12 hours ago by bniky95
81 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by Loops
94 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by PonBaron
243 Comments - Last post 54 minutes ago by Lugum
39 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by NoctuaVentus
192 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Kyrrelin
9 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by kudomonster
8,954 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by CurryKingWurst
Like most, I appreciate it when people bump my threads. It helps others notice the thread, and as a result there are more people commenting (other than the bumps) and more people entering
giveaways. With that said, seeing many generic "bump" posts in the message notification list is less pleasant. A simple (and probably unoriginal) solution is to bump-reply one of the comments instead of the OP. Is this a good idea?Comment has been collapsed.