Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
13 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by wigglenose
3,553 Comments - Last post 18 minutes ago by Gamy7
54 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by darkstar1999
11 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by DeltaBladeX
12 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by trex33361
306 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Kyshinn
480 Comments - Last post 9 hours ago by Tsukurai
56 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by wigglenose
1 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by ZungBang
140 Comments - Last post 37 minutes ago by Gawrazan
11 Comments - Last post 47 minutes ago by Yamaraus
19 Comments - Last post 55 minutes ago by Tucs
40 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by CptWest
112 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by therealwyy
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.