Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
364 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Pika8
13 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by MountTai
21 Comments - Last post 33 minutes ago by skycycle
327 Comments - Last post 41 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
306 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by Atombomb2097
39 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by Peiperissimus
1,954 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Wok
2 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Masafor
30 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Zero224
0 Comments - Created 17 minutes ago by FlameB1
66 Comments - Last post 45 minutes ago by DemonsRift
55 Comments - Last post 57 minutes ago by bestname
227 Comments - Last post 58 minutes ago by UnbakedBacon
6,723 Comments - Last post 59 minutes ago by Sebastien
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.