Not entering, but quite a lot of strategy games in there. Nice train, Fnord!
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm surprised that they did not use more railway artillery. In particular during WW1, on the western front, they had time to adapt the infrastructure to carry it, and it would allow them to hit the opposing side really hard. But then again, if the technology is not quite there yet, it might have been too much of a gamble.
Comment has been collapsed.
10 Comments - Last post 4 minutes ago by Lugum
49 Comments - Last post 24 minutes ago by Chris76de
76 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sensualshakti
34 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by JMM72
4 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by despiesi96
1,962 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by MeguminShiro
15 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by dingbat
464 Comments - Last post 59 seconds ago by th4
37 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by HustlaOG
261 Comments - Last post 8 minutes ago by HustlaOG
799 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by canis39
66 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Deyalleft
176 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Gberry
2,576 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by provi
Or just a train full of strategy?
>>
In trying to find a picture of an armoured train, I found a site which I think might just be a Russian propaganda site, going by both the tone, and its very.. erm.. selective use of facts (what was said on it was not untrue, just very selective). According to it we might see more armoured trains from Russian in the future!
Comment has been collapsed.