Make the puzzle, invite the solvers to a group made for that purpose, and create a SotMC giveaway for that group later. Problem solved.
Comment has been collapsed.
Right, so I would need to have some sort of system where I now have to check each entry manually, then make a new group, invite everyone to the new group, make a giveaway for the group...not to mention that to actually check that, i'd probably have to add each person who wants to enter on steam, so that they can add me....All in all, fuck that effort.
Now don't get me wrong, The problems that this will prevent are definitely good, but I'm not sure if I want people to know what game i'm giving away in a private giveaway or a puzzle...It's half the fun. Making it so that it only goes on your profile once it finishes, would be better IMHO.
Comment has been collapsed.
Yes please do, very useful also for group owners who invite people
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 to that. Doesn't spoil puzzle giveaways but you can see if someone abuses the system.
Comment has been collapsed.
If feasible this would be my favourite solution as well. This way puzzle giveaways could still be a surprise.
If this is not possible showing them from the beginning would still be better than the current situation.
Comment has been collapsed.
-1
Not divulging the game in a puzzle giveaway ahead of time is called being a douche.
Comment has been collapsed.
While I have a completely different opinion about this, I can somewhat understand your stance on the matter but calling me and a lot of other puzzle makers douches over this is quite a douche move in itself.
If you don't enjoy puzzle-solving on its own and want to absolutely avoid solving puzzles for giveaways you don't want to enter than just stay away from puzzles with unknown prizes - problem solved.
And if you disagree on this and want to discuss changes to the current system, fine. No problem with that and if cg sees it the same way and makes all giveaways visible, so be it. But seriously, is it really necessary to insult people who put much effort and money into making their puzzles because of this shit?
Comment has been collapsed.
Running private giveaways /you entered/, or running group giveaways, should always show on the creator's profile.
Comment has been collapsed.
Two months ago I sent a list of about 100 profiles with not activated won games on their accounts. I can't see if they marked them as received or not but I guess at least half of them is guilty.
Comment has been collapsed.
Sounds like the pros outweigh the cons. I support this.
Comment has been collapsed.
143 Comments - Last post 6 minutes ago by Warriot
12 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by Myklex
23 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by Leon30670
983 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by IAMERROR404
269 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Koalala
1,294 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by sensualshakti
956 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by glodar
16 Comments - Last post 2 minutes ago by Tucs
89 Comments - Last post 7 minutes ago by ahar010
10,943 Comments - Last post 14 minutes ago by Bum8ara5h
25 Comments - Last post 30 minutes ago by HustlaOG
1,265 Comments - Last post 31 minutes ago by Lugum
1,336 Comments - Last post 46 minutes ago by Octorocket
17,848 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by Riszu
Quick question, should we have private and group giveaways viewable on profiles, simply without the links to open them? Right now it seems the site offers a way for abusers to hide a little too easily, and a number of giveaway creators have questions about their winners since they're allowed to see so few details.
Regarding begging, we'll be able to act on users fairly quick with the new user reporting system, so I don't think we'll need to worry about people messaging those with private giveaways.
And for puzzles, you'll be able to confirm a user does in fact have a private giveaway setup, and you'll know the game, so you don't need to worry about solving the puzzle to find a game already in your library.
Thoughts?
Comment has been collapsed.