how do we know if the people enter through leaked links..???
Comment has been collapsed.
Basically you check the entries; if you only gave the GA link to Friends A, B, C, D & E but yet you see A, C, D, M, P, Z entered, something is fishy!
Comment has been collapsed.
I've seen you deleted a really good recent giveaway. That's sad. ;_;
Well, what kind of giveaway was it? Sgtools? Puzzle?
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, I couldn't remember it. Hmmm, so how did it get leaked? o.O Anyone could just check the post and click on it.
Comment has been collapsed.
That's common in every giveaway. xD Anyway, I hope he'll find a way to avoid leaking.
Comment has been collapsed.
To quote my note to support:
"Apparently, a friend told me and sent me a link to an area where somebody had gone onto a malicious site, and leaked my Invite-Only Gib. What then transpired was several entries of bots that were all unique.
They've done this to me once before long ago on a DS3 gib I made. I feel like i'm being targeted almost. In any case, since these "bots" aren't exactly easy to spot (which means they all have unique profiles and games on those accounts) means I cannot continue this.
I didn't receive this message until a little bit ago of me canceling this. I checked to verify the information on the website myself as well."
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a really shifty thing to have had done to you
Comment has been collapsed.
That is a shame. I was very excited to see that giveaway. I think the only way around it is with SGTools but that would then defeat the purpose maybe of an open giveaway like that.
Comment has been collapsed.
Cyber Security field. We often go to hacking sites (under VPNs of course) and attend conferences. A hacking website (mostly amateurs) was talking about SG. One such conference happening in October 6-7th in two days is called Grr-Con which is essentially a hacker's conference.
Tickets start at $250 in Grand Rapids, MI and they're already sold out except for a few special ones.
The site was a discussion for white-hat hackers, but there are always black-hat hackers who do their own thing and try to do some more malicious hacking.
I'm going to point out: All hacking websites are malicious because they deal with the concept of hacking into another person's information. Doesn't matter if white-hat or black-hat. That deals more with Ethical hacking though which is a long telling.
Comment has been collapsed.
that is sooooo annnoying - I was really looking forward to the drawing of that giveaway :( - slim chance of winning that game was better than no chance - but I fully appreciate why you deleted it in the end (sad for you - shiny wishes sent your way :)
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm sorry this happened to you. I entered the giveaway initially from your thread and saw the entries recently increase to public giveaway levels. It's sad that you had to cancel the GA, but better than giving it to a bot. Good luck with future giveaways.
Comment has been collapsed.
A lot of what I'm seeing lately from puzzlemakers is making a whitelist gib, emptying their WL and only adding the people who solved the puzzle. I guess is an alternative, as I'm not sure you have any way to stop leakage.
Comment has been collapsed.
And even then, you can't be sure that someone didn't give someone else the answers. I had an idea last month to make about 100 variables of a puzzle, so that each person would have to solve a different variable, to make sure no answers are being shared, but that would take a lot of time and work. I still intend to do something like that soon, though.
Comment has been collapsed.
It's really exhausting. And a lack of respect to leak the answers/link. I already don't get why people feel the need to blacklist puzzlemakers if they don't like/ can't solve the puzzle :(
Your current idea with the people having it wishlisted before a certain point in time is good too.
Comment has been collapsed.
agreed about the lack of respect - but the wishlist thing is only good for some I suppose - we rarely wishlist everything we want anymore - lack of time means we tend to only see some games when they come up for giveaways - then we click on them and decide if we want to enter - the wishlist thing means I cannot enter :( sad face here - but I appreciate why some choose to do it this way (not something I would get bent out of shape over at all)
I get more annoyed that many of the winners of my giveaways seem to rule breakers with multiple unactivated wins and even regifted items !!!! - but they are still free to enter all giveaways....
Comment has been collapsed.
Use your whitelist and personally invite people. It's what I do nowadays.
Comment has been collapsed.
The most effective and easiest way would probably be to not make any giveaways at all. But I'm doubting that it is in your interest or in the interest of those people who like your giveaways. You could try appealing to the honour feeling of the people (it will not work). Other than that your only chance is to limit the entry conditions: Creating a group for the giveaways or using the whitelist feature.
It is sadly the most effective solution for a problem that should not exist. Other than that you still have the possibility to develop a super advanced A.I. which is capable of finding the leakers and deleting their hard drive.
Comment has been collapsed.
Both no options when you want to have people on forums to have a chance.
Unless you want it only to access able a small group of people, but then again you could have done that form start on. that you didnt means you wanted for everyone to have a chance to find / enter it.
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm with dingbat above :) - but i do not have a cute gif to offer in exchange for the chance later on if you do decide to re-do the giveaway in another form - groveling is not beneath me, but I figured just concentrating shiny wishes to you really hard might work :) - giggle
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a really good script, I'll start using it. Thanks. :)
Comment has been collapsed.
Well, there's no real solution for it. Whitelist and group giveaways atleast limit the possibilities of unfair behavior.
Comment has been collapsed.
1) You can ask people to make screenshot of solved puzzle , BUT it can be tiresome.
2) In the middle of puzzle make instruction to solver for him 100% post a special text in your previous GA, but it can clutter your messages inbox. checked it - this option is a bad concept
3) Whitelist and Group management also can be tiresome so level 3+ is easiest but it can contradict with your rules of how you want to do events
Comment has been collapsed.
Slap some joint compound on there. Caulk is good too. In an emergency use duct tape until you have a more permanent solution.
I hope this helps.
Comment has been collapsed.
Anyway to Stop Gib Leakage?
Sorry, someone HAD to suggest it.
Now, I'm perfectly aware that there're people who are completely avert to it, but that's really the only good answer that's not "stop making gibs".
Comment has been collapsed.
+1 for sgtools
I don't get it though, why are some people opposed to it? From my perspective (as a relatively new community member) it's an amazing tool, and does what the site should already do automatically...
What's the story behind the aversion some people seem to have against it?
Comment has been collapsed.
Why are some people opposed to it?
https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/b736C/tool-sgtools-new-section-deals/search?page=24#0e1mCuX
And that's what prompted cg to post this: https://www.steamgifts.com/discussion/Vn6ZQ/guidelines-update-referrals-gleam
Comment has been collapsed.
That's a shame, I was kinda looking forward to that Dishonored 2 giveaway...
Like others, I would suggest protecting the GA with sgtools. This way you can make sure the winner went through proper channels.
Maybe it can also help to add a cv requirement, at least level 1 or 2 (I can't recall whether your original GA had one or not)
Comment has been collapsed.
Wouldn't they just instead of leaking the "gib link" leak the "sgtools link"? Unless the sgtools link actually blocks the bots out somehow, it still doesn't really protect you.
Personally I think a level 3 level requirement (either with or without sgtools) would probably be the best way to filter out the bots. Level 3 can be earner -relatively- easy if you have given away a few proper games. Bots usually don't give enough to get to level 3 though.
And to be honest. Kerros usually does such amazing gibs, having to be level 3 to enter isn't that much to ask :3
Comment has been collapsed.
I'm guessing usually the gib link would be behind a puzzle. If the sgtools link would now be behind the puzzle, it wouldn't matter, the people can still leak it so the ones that get leaked to don't have to finish the puzzle themselves.
But yes, I agree. Using an SGTOOLS with a "no rules broken" "no multiple wins" etc. will probably filter out most of those shitty bots. Even if they were to somehow get past it once or twice, surely they will get banned sometime for doing something wrong D:
Or I hope so anyways :3
Bad guys usually get what they deserve!
Or so I would like to believe anyways :3
Comment has been collapsed.
Yep, SGTools implements a strike system, users who enter giveaways bypassing the filters are suspended from all SGTools giveaways, with the duration increasing with each infraction (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, then permanent).
There're currently 14 users who are banned from SGTools, according to the last report (August 27th).
Comment has been collapsed.
SGtools come to mind to know if you have users who bypassed the filters.
Comment has been collapsed.
58 Comments - Last post 54 seconds ago by vlbastos
437 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by CRAZY463708
64 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Sneezin
45 Comments - Last post 11 minutes ago by Ezeekyule
391 Comments - Last post 28 minutes ago by thenevernow
1,727 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by MeguminShiro
17,128 Comments - Last post 43 minutes ago by BHTrellis188
10,813 Comments - Last post 1 minute ago by Swordoffury
598 Comments - Last post 5 minutes ago by Prosac
76 Comments - Last post 10 minutes ago by Trashes
1,793 Comments - Last post 16 minutes ago by DrSubscribe
637 Comments - Last post 25 minutes ago by Ygritte07
75 Comments - Last post 26 minutes ago by ThePonz
603 Comments - Last post 32 minutes ago by LaVolpe99
Topic ^
Would like to know
Comment has been collapsed.