Real life just got real (Short Train inside)

that is it indeed if the legends are to be believed about 'real life'

I've seen it. It haz awesome graphics!!

Don't take this personally, but I'll pick apart your build there for a second:

• 16 GB of RAM are cheap, but useless in a normal gaming PC. Until 16GB will be of use (unless there's also video-editing, virtual machines or similar going on, or you're hosting an own server) - even if cheap, until more than 8GB of RAM will be of use in a normal gaming machine, the CPU will likely be too slow to handle future gaming applications - and even if not: save the money, buy later if needed. Odds are that the CPU will be slower before 16GB RAM are needed, and DDR4 is just around the corner, so taking the 16GB DDR3 to the newer system won't be an option. Potential waste of money
• 4690K and the motherboard are potenially good choices, but: They're designed for overclocking, and the Hyper212 Evo is just not sufficient enough to cool components well under overclocking. Either go for a H97 motherboard and a 4590 CPU, or maybe stuff a xeon in there for a little more potential in speed, or choose overclocking and go for a better cooler instead. Also, not every user will automatically want to overclock the CPU - the OT should contemplate about that
• the power supply is just atrocious. Lackluster quality components and capacitors coming with a cheap fan - no, thank you. A better alternative for little money would be this one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151136
  Medium priced but of much better quality and with 550W able to handle every single GPU you throw at it. Never, ever save money on the power supply, for a cheap one can fry your components and savings of originally 30 - 50 bucks will become damages beyond $100
• The GTX960 isn't a potentially bad GPU, altough I'd prefer the MSI oder ASUS variants on that, but that's personal. EVGA is just fine. What's bothering about the 960 is the 2GB of Vram, which even under "just" 1080p resolution will become problematic for some AAA-titles in the future. Problem is though, that the gap between the wonderful GTX970 and the 960 in performance and price is a little harsh. The R9 290 of radeon fills that gap, at around $250 for much better performance and more vram than the GTX960. Although the OT (looking at you) wanted an intel/nvidia-build, the R9 290 would be the best card in terms or bang for buck in this rig / price range

The SSD and case are wonderful choices though.

Edit:
Also note that Intel will soon release the newer skylake-CPUs with DDR4 RAM and a little more performance/watt and higher ipc than haswell/broadwell, while AMD has new graphics cards in the pipe for release soon, which might change the pricing structure of nvidia's cards under the right conditions. One should ofc not wait too long, a pc has to be bought when it's got to be bought, but under the right conditions, one can also save money here and get more bang for buck