Indeed, and from what it seems, it doesn't really matter.
Comment has been collapsed.
You get points like shit as it is, it would be a disaster to increase the rate even more.
Comment has been collapsed.
5,763 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Carenard
8 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Microfish
3 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by Tourfaint
4 Comments - Last post 6 hours ago by Nogift4u
18,705 Comments - Last post 7 hours ago by Ifoundadeadrat
1,910 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by DeafCrocodile
39 Comments - Last post 8 hours ago by Foxhack
41 Comments - Last post 36 minutes ago by FleecyBear
260 Comments - Last post 49 minutes ago by FateOfOne
62 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by Lizewski
254 Comments - Last post 1 hour ago by uvatar
5 Comments - Last post 2 hours ago by shirepirate
2,208 Comments - Last post 3 hours ago by nocnocylc
833 Comments - Last post 5 hours ago by vot4ol
I'm wondering if one's point accumulation could be dynamically based on points spent vs # of times won. If someone has one then they accumulate 5% of the points entered but if I've been entering for 2 months and haven't won anything then my point accumulation rate would raise maybe to 20% or so? This would help level off winners and keep people interested. As someone spends more points then their accumulation rate slowly rises back up. It keeps people from hoarding points and helps everyone win something at some point.
Comment has been collapsed.